What is this fashion about vote 5 for one line post?
-
I though the votes for post were to give importance to the post so when you see the page you can see clearly if the post has a merit or not. I see that it is out of control and even the most of the stupid post has a 5 score and looks red :) with 5 or 6 votes. This is a classic example of greedy people, because it affects the “MVP” score now everyone is voting for everyone…. Can’t you see it that you will have to wait another year to see if you will be a MVP? :) And in all this time you are screwing the posts? I really don’t have time to read every post made, so usually I go for the red ones and closer to them…. If that was the original idea then it doesn’t work anymore. :(
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
CastorTiu wrote:
Can’t you see it that you will have to wait another year to see if you will be a MVP? And in all this time you are screwing the posts?
I don't think posts in the lounge count.
Upcoming Scottish Developers events: * Glasgow: Tell us what you want to see in 2007 My: Website | Blog | Photos
-
I though the votes for post were to give importance to the post so when you see the page you can see clearly if the post has a merit or not. I see that it is out of control and even the most of the stupid post has a 5 score and looks red :) with 5 or 6 votes. This is a classic example of greedy people, because it affects the “MVP” score now everyone is voting for everyone…. Can’t you see it that you will have to wait another year to see if you will be a MVP? :) And in all this time you are screwing the posts? I really don’t have time to read every post made, so usually I go for the red ones and closer to them…. If that was the original idea then it doesn’t work anymore. :(
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
Didn't you know, any post with "MVP" in the subject is automatically voted a 5 by the CP code. (why do you think Michael Dunn put "(MVP)" in his thread subject below?) ;P
"For fifty bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow." - George Costanza
CP article: SmartPager - a Flickr-style pager control with go-to-page popup layer.
-
I though the votes for post were to give importance to the post so when you see the page you can see clearly if the post has a merit or not. I see that it is out of control and even the most of the stupid post has a 5 score and looks red :) with 5 or 6 votes. This is a classic example of greedy people, because it affects the “MVP” score now everyone is voting for everyone…. Can’t you see it that you will have to wait another year to see if you will be a MVP? :) And in all this time you are screwing the posts? I really don’t have time to read every post made, so usually I go for the red ones and closer to them…. If that was the original idea then it doesn’t work anymore. :(
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
CastorTiu wrote:
I though the votes for post were to give importance to the post
Or humor, or a good comeback, or whatever.
CastorTiu wrote:
I see that it is out of control
Different stroke for different folks.
CastorTiu wrote:
And in all this time you are screwing the posts?
I think that's pretty much stopped now.
CastorTiu wrote:
If that was the original idea then it doesn’t work anymore.
I don't think it was ever the original idea.
CastorTiu wrote:
don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
Hell, if you don't question it, they'll never explain it! Ironic, isn't it. If you followed your own advice, you wouldn't have posted your question, as you obviously don't know the reason for the 5 votes. ;P Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
CastorTiu wrote:
Can’t you see it that you will have to wait another year to see if you will be a MVP? And in all this time you are screwing the posts?
I don't think posts in the lounge count.
Upcoming Scottish Developers events: * Glasgow: Tell us what you want to see in 2007 My: Website | Blog | Photos
So there. I gave you a five for a one-line post.
Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Velopers, Develprs, Developers!
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify!|Fold With Us! -
CastorTiu wrote:
Can’t you see it that you will have to wait another year to see if you will be a MVP? And in all this time you are screwing the posts?
I don't think posts in the lounge count.
Upcoming Scottish Developers events: * Glasgow: Tell us what you want to see in 2007 My: Website | Blog | Photos
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
I don't think posts in the lounge count.
what he said. :-D
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
So there. I gave you a five for a one-line post.
Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Velopers, Develprs, Developers!
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify!|Fold With Us!peterchen wrote:
So there. I gave you a five for a one-line post.
Well said, Sir!
Upcoming Scottish Developers events: * Glasgow: Tell us what you want to see in 2007 My: Website | Blog | Photos
-
CastorTiu wrote:
I though the votes for post were to give importance to the post
Or humor, or a good comeback, or whatever.
CastorTiu wrote:
I see that it is out of control
Different stroke for different folks.
CastorTiu wrote:
And in all this time you are screwing the posts?
I think that's pretty much stopped now.
CastorTiu wrote:
If that was the original idea then it doesn’t work anymore.
I don't think it was ever the original idea.
CastorTiu wrote:
don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
Hell, if you don't question it, they'll never explain it! Ironic, isn't it. If you followed your own advice, you wouldn't have posted your question, as you obviously don't know the reason for the 5 votes. ;P Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh SmithAs you probably noticed English is not my native language :) although I tried to learn words everyday. When I meant “question” I didn’t mean question = ask else question = complain I can see that this is not the properly word to be used and I’ll work on a new one :).
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
-
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
I don't think posts in the lounge count.
what he said. :-D
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:
what he said.
Really? Excellent! :-D
Upcoming Scottish Developers events: * Glasgow: Tell us what you want to see in 2007 My: Website | Blog | Photos
-
As you probably noticed English is not my native language :) although I tried to learn words everyday. When I meant “question” I didn’t mean question = ask else question = complain I can see that this is not the properly word to be used and I’ll work on a new one :).
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
-
I though the votes for post were to give importance to the post so when you see the page you can see clearly if the post has a merit or not. I see that it is out of control and even the most of the stupid post has a 5 score and looks red :) with 5 or 6 votes. This is a classic example of greedy people, because it affects the “MVP” score now everyone is voting for everyone…. Can’t you see it that you will have to wait another year to see if you will be a MVP? :) And in all this time you are screwing the posts? I really don’t have time to read every post made, so usually I go for the red ones and closer to them…. If that was the original idea then it doesn’t work anymore. :(
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
CastorTiu wrote:
I though the votes for post were to give importance to the post so when you see the page you can see clearly if the post has a merit or not.
But sometimes I am just in a good mood and like almost everything! :) I had a very good week last week. :)
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
Ironically I think actually you are correct in your use of the word "question" as I saw it quoted.
OMG I got owned... what susceptible you girls are. One must be carefull what to put here :)
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
-
I though the votes for post were to give importance to the post so when you see the page you can see clearly if the post has a merit or not. I see that it is out of control and even the most of the stupid post has a 5 score and looks red :) with 5 or 6 votes. This is a classic example of greedy people, because it affects the “MVP” score now everyone is voting for everyone…. Can’t you see it that you will have to wait another year to see if you will be a MVP? :) And in all this time you are screwing the posts? I really don’t have time to read every post made, so usually I go for the red ones and closer to them…. If that was the original idea then it doesn’t work anymore. :(
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
Context is important. Short colloquialisms can carry a lot of meaning, but obscure the meaning for outsiders.
---- I just want you to be happy; That's my only little wish...
-
OMG I got owned... what susceptible you girls are. One must be carefull what to put here :)
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
-
Context is important. Short colloquialisms can carry a lot of meaning, but obscure the meaning for outsiders.
---- I just want you to be happy; That's my only little wish...
says very much. Contrary to the sayers belief, it says more about the sayer than the information contained in that specific sequence of 14 words. When anyone utters those 14 words, I usually reply with only 2 words. Kyle knows which two and in what order they come. X|
-- Painstakingly Drawn Before a Live Audience
-
OMG I got owned... what susceptible you girls are. One must be carefull what to put here :)
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
CastorTiu wrote:
OMG I got owned... what susceptible you girls are.
Not sure what it means, but :laugh:
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliot Me blog, You read
-
says very much. Contrary to the sayers belief, it says more about the sayer than the information contained in that specific sequence of 14 words. When anyone utters those 14 words, I usually reply with only 2 words. Kyle knows which two and in what order they come. X|
-- Painstakingly Drawn Before a Live Audience
Kay must be very famous in one degree or another because I saw many people mention him through the forums over time :)
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
-
Kay must be very famous in one degree or another because I saw many people mention him through the forums over time :)
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
Infamous is probably the correct word... ;)
-- Please rise for the Futurama theme song
-
I though the votes for post were to give importance to the post so when you see the page you can see clearly if the post has a merit or not. I see that it is out of control and even the most of the stupid post has a 5 score and looks red :) with 5 or 6 votes. This is a classic example of greedy people, because it affects the “MVP” score now everyone is voting for everyone…. Can’t you see it that you will have to wait another year to see if you will be a MVP? :) And in all this time you are screwing the posts? I really don’t have time to read every post made, so usually I go for the red ones and closer to them…. If that was the original idea then it doesn’t work anymore. :(
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
Voting isn't wrist-friendly.