1's and 5's
-
Basing the MVPs on votes is an error, in my opinion. There a lot of correct answers to complicated questions in the forums that get no 5 as reward, whereas some programmers get excited when you tell them how to change their cursor shape or how to hide a window, and vote you 5 to the 7 answers it took you to made it clear for them. Of course, you have to start with something for picking out the "bests of the best" ... But there are plenty of people here who deserves a distinction and who will not get it because they were away from the boards three months in the year or that they simply answer only tough questions (since the obvious get a pretty fast answer usually). So what I wanted to say is, I would not put much weight in the distinctions, but would only say that I find the whole community awesome. You are all MVPs for me.
Rage wrote:
There a lot of correct answers to complicated questions in the forums that get no 5 as reward, whereas some programmers get excited when you tell them how to change their cursor shape or how to hide a window, and vote you 5 to the 7 answers it took you to made it clear for them.
5 from me,too.
Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]
-
Rage wrote:
So what I wanted to say is, I would not put much weight in the distinctions, but would only say that I find the whole community awesome. You are all MVPs for me.
Sounds good enough for a 5 from me.
the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before. -
V. is love. V. is truth. V. is happiness. Happy?
the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before. -
As a matter of intrest ... We all know that the initial mvp list included the % of 5's the people got. Who do you think got the most 1's? Chris could you do a count + % and lets see who can guess the closest? :-D;P:-D
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness. ~Sheik Abd-al-Kadir
I can't always be wrong ... or can I?CaveFox wrote:
Who do you think got the most 1's?
So, you think we should have an LVP award too? :laugh: Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
CaveFox wrote:
Who do you think got the most 1's?
So, you think we should have an LVP award too? :laugh: Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
As a matter of intrest ... We all know that the initial mvp list included the % of 5's the people got. Who do you think got the most 1's? Chris could you do a count + % and lets see who can guess the closest? :-D;P:-D
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness. ~Sheik Abd-al-Kadir
I can't always be wrong ... or can I? -
CaveFox wrote:
Who do you think got the most 1's?
So, you think we should have an LVP award too? :laugh: Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh SmithYup :-D
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness. ~Sheik Abd-al-Kadir
I can't always be wrong ... or can I? -
It's Ajax, not AJAX... :P
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
Don't get me started. Our overall brand name at work is "Versamark". Five years ago when we first started using it, they couldn't decide whether it was "VersaMark" or "Versamark". I had to pick one, and chose "VersaMark". Last year, someone over in marketing noticed that we were using VersaMark in a couple of places and threw a conniption fit over it. I spent a week changing every occurrence of VersaMark to Versamark. This included strings in the user interface, filenames, registry key names, source files, SourceSafe project names, help files and their sources, and so on.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
-- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.
-
Don't get me started. Our overall brand name at work is "Versamark". Five years ago when we first started using it, they couldn't decide whether it was "VersaMark" or "Versamark". I had to pick one, and chose "VersaMark". Last year, someone over in marketing noticed that we were using VersaMark in a couple of places and threw a conniption fit over it. I spent a week changing every occurrence of VersaMark to Versamark. This included strings in the user interface, filenames, registry key names, source files, SourceSafe project names, help files and their sources, and so on.
Software Zen:
delete this;VersaMark seems better to me. :)
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
CaveFox wrote:
Who do you think got the most 1's?
So, you think we should have an LVP award too? :laugh: Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh SmithThat would seem reasonable.:) Imagine how worrying it would be if you were in both lists though...
the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before. -
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
-- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.
dan neely wrote:
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
That's easy for you to say.
the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before. -
hehe, yet another advertiser who has no clue. Same with people who write ".Net" instead of ".NET" The original Ajax doc uses that format.[^]
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
I thought it was .net
-
I thought it was .net
.net is a TLD, .NET is a framework from Microsoft. :)
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
It's Ajax, not AJAX... :P
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
Jeez, Paul. Get a life. Stop being so nitpicky about capitalization. Ajax, AJAX, .net, .Net, .NET, .nEt...;P
Once you wanted revolution
Now you're the institution
How's it feel to be the man?