Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Long life battery

Long life battery

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
designquestion
17 Posts 12 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Hamed Musavi
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I was wondering about batteries and at the same time about the universe. The universe is moving a long long time, without any stop. Where does the energy come from? Can't we design a system like that using gravity to create a battery with a long long life? I mean creating a moving system using gravity and converting movement to electricity.

    //This is not a signature while (I'm_alive) { cout<<"I Love Programming"; }

    C E R 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • H Hamed Musavi

      I was wondering about batteries and at the same time about the universe. The universe is moving a long long time, without any stop. Where does the energy come from? Can't we design a system like that using gravity to create a battery with a long long life? I mean creating a moving system using gravity and converting movement to electricity.

      //This is not a signature while (I'm_alive) { cout<<"I Love Programming"; }

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Christian Graus
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      The universe is moving as a result of initial impetus, as far as I understand it.

      Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

      H 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Christian Graus

        The universe is moving as a result of initial impetus, as far as I understand it.

        Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

        H Offline
        H Offline
        Hamed Musavi
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Whatever is the reason of the gravity, it exists for so long. Human being already converted the energy caught from sun to power, while sun is not always there! Why don't try gravity?

        //This is not a signature while (I'm_alive) { cout<<"I Love Programming"; }

        S O V 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • H Hamed Musavi

          Whatever is the reason of the gravity, it exists for so long. Human being already converted the energy caught from sun to power, while sun is not always there! Why don't try gravity?

          //This is not a signature while (I'm_alive) { cout<<"I Love Programming"; }

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Simon P Stevens
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          There is already a widely used system that harness the power of gravity to generate electricity. Misleadingly, it's called Hydro power. Water stored in a dam, is forced through openings in the dam, due to the weight (hence gravity) of all the water above. The rushing water then spins turbines to generate electricity. You can't generate energy, only transfer already existing stored energy. So to get energy from gravity, you need to find high up objects, and drop them, causing them to release their energy. The obvious problem is that you have to somehow get the objects high up in the first place, which requires energy. Simon

          A C B 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • H Hamed Musavi

            Whatever is the reason of the gravity, it exists for so long. Human being already converted the energy caught from sun to power, while sun is not always there! Why don't try gravity?

            //This is not a signature while (I'm_alive) { cout<<"I Love Programming"; }

            O Offline
            O Offline
            originSH
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            There are some places that use gravity for power but alot of the time it's indirect. Geothermal power comes from gravity, without up and down there arn't any convection currents, also tidal power comes from the gravity of the moon.

            F 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Simon P Stevens

              There is already a widely used system that harness the power of gravity to generate electricity. Misleadingly, it's called Hydro power. Water stored in a dam, is forced through openings in the dam, due to the weight (hence gravity) of all the water above. The rushing water then spins turbines to generate electricity. You can't generate energy, only transfer already existing stored energy. So to get energy from gravity, you need to find high up objects, and drop them, causing them to release their energy. The obvious problem is that you have to somehow get the objects high up in the first place, which requires energy. Simon

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Aryo Handono
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Simon Stevens wrote:

              You can't generate energy, only transfer already existing stored energy.

              Agree, basic law of energy.. People also have energy in their body, when people died the energy turn out become .... (guess)

              "Courage choose who will follow, Fate choose who will lead" - Lord Gunner, Septerra Core "Press any key to continue, where's the ANY key ?" - Homer Simpsons Drinking gives me amazing powers of insight. I can solve all the worlds problems when drunk, but can never remember the solutions in the morning. - Michael P Butler to Paul Watson on 12/08/03

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Simon P Stevens

                There is already a widely used system that harness the power of gravity to generate electricity. Misleadingly, it's called Hydro power. Water stored in a dam, is forced through openings in the dam, due to the weight (hence gravity) of all the water above. The rushing water then spins turbines to generate electricity. You can't generate energy, only transfer already existing stored energy. So to get energy from gravity, you need to find high up objects, and drop them, causing them to release their energy. The obvious problem is that you have to somehow get the objects high up in the first place, which requires energy. Simon

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Christian Graus
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                You beat me to it.

                Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O originSH

                  There are some places that use gravity for power but alot of the time it's indirect. Geothermal power comes from gravity, without up and down there arn't any convection currents, also tidal power comes from the gravity of the moon.

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  Frank Kerrigan
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Pity we're going to lose the moon. Its slipping away 1cm every year.


                  Blog Have I http:\\www.frankkerrigan.com

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Simon P Stevens

                    There is already a widely used system that harness the power of gravity to generate electricity. Misleadingly, it's called Hydro power. Water stored in a dam, is forced through openings in the dam, due to the weight (hence gravity) of all the water above. The rushing water then spins turbines to generate electricity. You can't generate energy, only transfer already existing stored energy. So to get energy from gravity, you need to find high up objects, and drop them, causing them to release their energy. The obvious problem is that you have to somehow get the objects high up in the first place, which requires energy. Simon

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    benjymous
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    So to answer the original poster, we need AA batteries that hook up to the water supply... Sounds good to me! :laugh:

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H Hamed Musavi

                      Whatever is the reason of the gravity, it exists for so long. Human being already converted the energy caught from sun to power, while sun is not always there! Why don't try gravity?

                      //This is not a signature while (I'm_alive) { cout<<"I Love Programming"; }

                      V Offline
                      V Offline
                      V 0
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Maybe, but they knew the Sun way before they knew Gravity :-).

                      V. I found a living worth working for, but haven't found work worth living for.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H Hamed Musavi

                        I was wondering about batteries and at the same time about the universe. The universe is moving a long long time, without any stop. Where does the energy come from? Can't we design a system like that using gravity to create a battery with a long long life? I mean creating a moving system using gravity and converting movement to electricity.

                        //This is not a signature while (I'm_alive) { cout<<"I Love Programming"; }

                        E Offline
                        E Offline
                        El Corazon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Hamed Mosavi wrote:

                        Where does the energy come from?

                        That is a question that has been pondering cosmologists for ages. The most common accepted theory is a huge black-hole that blew up, the motion of the universe is still following that initial explosion that was ... well ... big. So "if" this is true, you would like a black hole in your pocket? I'll pass. Some forms of energy are a little too powerful. Lightning for instance is a small fraction of the energy potential of a black-hole, yet nothing we have is capable (yet) of harnessing this energy. Another magnitude upwards, but still a small fraction of the energy potential of a black-hole, would be the sun. I also would not like to carry a fusion reactor in my pocket. There is a lot of energy around us every day, the question is how to harness it. For instance, a watch[^] powered by human movement, is not for the couch potato. Obviously, if you choose not to make energy, a kinetic watch can't avail itself of your potential energy and turn it into real energy. which is where the problem is. Hydro-electric needs water, and you need to lift it high, creating potential energy against gravity. Wind needs more than a breeze to turn a turbine, Solar needs the sun. No energy is "free" and "perpetual". To get energy, you need to take energy from another system, borrowing energy or transferring energy if you prefer. No one ever "creates" energy, they release its potential energy into useable forms of energy. borrowing energy from the universe, though theoretically possible, would be difficult because the energy has to be reduced from the original energy structure.... you could transfer energy by slowing down the galaxy minutely transferring the kinetic innertial energy into electricity, but how are you going to slow down the galaxy in order to transfer that energy? -- modified at 11:02 Tuesday 16th January, 2007

                        _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                        D V 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • E El Corazon

                          Hamed Mosavi wrote:

                          Where does the energy come from?

                          That is a question that has been pondering cosmologists for ages. The most common accepted theory is a huge black-hole that blew up, the motion of the universe is still following that initial explosion that was ... well ... big. So "if" this is true, you would like a black hole in your pocket? I'll pass. Some forms of energy are a little too powerful. Lightning for instance is a small fraction of the energy potential of a black-hole, yet nothing we have is capable (yet) of harnessing this energy. Another magnitude upwards, but still a small fraction of the energy potential of a black-hole, would be the sun. I also would not like to carry a fusion reactor in my pocket. There is a lot of energy around us every day, the question is how to harness it. For instance, a watch[^] powered by human movement, is not for the couch potato. Obviously, if you choose not to make energy, a kinetic watch can't avail itself of your potential energy and turn it into real energy. which is where the problem is. Hydro-electric needs water, and you need to lift it high, creating potential energy against gravity. Wind needs more than a breeze to turn a turbine, Solar needs the sun. No energy is "free" and "perpetual". To get energy, you need to take energy from another system, borrowing energy or transferring energy if you prefer. No one ever "creates" energy, they release its potential energy into useable forms of energy. borrowing energy from the universe, though theoretically possible, would be difficult because the energy has to be reduced from the original energy structure.... you could transfer energy by slowing down the galaxy minutely transferring the kinetic innertial energy into electricity, but how are you going to slow down the galaxy in order to transfer that energy? -- modified at 11:02 Tuesday 16th January, 2007

                          _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Dan Neely
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

                          borrowing energy from the universe, though theoretically possible, would be difficult because the energy has to be reduced from the original energy structure.... you could transfer energy by slowing down the galaxy minutely transferring the kinetic innertial energy into electricity, but how are you going to slow down the galaxy in order to transfer that energy?

                          Instead of trying to tap kinetic energy you could go after the vacuum energy. I know there's at least one research team trying to make a device to do this using quantum oscillators the casimir(??) effect.

                          -- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.

                          E 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • E El Corazon

                            Hamed Mosavi wrote:

                            Where does the energy come from?

                            That is a question that has been pondering cosmologists for ages. The most common accepted theory is a huge black-hole that blew up, the motion of the universe is still following that initial explosion that was ... well ... big. So "if" this is true, you would like a black hole in your pocket? I'll pass. Some forms of energy are a little too powerful. Lightning for instance is a small fraction of the energy potential of a black-hole, yet nothing we have is capable (yet) of harnessing this energy. Another magnitude upwards, but still a small fraction of the energy potential of a black-hole, would be the sun. I also would not like to carry a fusion reactor in my pocket. There is a lot of energy around us every day, the question is how to harness it. For instance, a watch[^] powered by human movement, is not for the couch potato. Obviously, if you choose not to make energy, a kinetic watch can't avail itself of your potential energy and turn it into real energy. which is where the problem is. Hydro-electric needs water, and you need to lift it high, creating potential energy against gravity. Wind needs more than a breeze to turn a turbine, Solar needs the sun. No energy is "free" and "perpetual". To get energy, you need to take energy from another system, borrowing energy or transferring energy if you prefer. No one ever "creates" energy, they release its potential energy into useable forms of energy. borrowing energy from the universe, though theoretically possible, would be difficult because the energy has to be reduced from the original energy structure.... you could transfer energy by slowing down the galaxy minutely transferring the kinetic innertial energy into electricity, but how are you going to slow down the galaxy in order to transfer that energy? -- modified at 11:02 Tuesday 16th January, 2007

                            _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                            V Offline
                            V Offline
                            Vikram A Punathambekar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

                            The most common accepted theory is a huge black-hole that blew up

                            Wouldn't that be a white hole? :~

                            Cheers, Vikram.


                            "Life isn't fair, and the world is full of unscrupulous characters. There are things worth fighting for, killing for and dying for, but it's a really small list. Chalk it up to experience, let it go, and move on to the next positive experience in your life." - Christopher Duncan.

                            E 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dan Neely

                              Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

                              borrowing energy from the universe, though theoretically possible, would be difficult because the energy has to be reduced from the original energy structure.... you could transfer energy by slowing down the galaxy minutely transferring the kinetic innertial energy into electricity, but how are you going to slow down the galaxy in order to transfer that energy?

                              Instead of trying to tap kinetic energy you could go after the vacuum energy. I know there's at least one research team trying to make a device to do this using quantum oscillators the casimir(??) effect.

                              -- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.

                              E Offline
                              E Offline
                              El Corazon
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              dan neely wrote:

                              Instead of trying to tap kinetic energy you could go after the vacuum energy. I know there's at least one research team trying to make a device to do this using quantum oscillators the casimir(??) effect.

                              very true. Zero Point Energy of the universe is potentially very powerful. Though as I read it the casimir effect requires very finely aligned plates, the energy extracted is being experiented from many fronts. But the most excitement comes from nono-tech since Casimir Effect easily generates energy in small amounts involving small distances, its the perfect energy supply for nanotech.. The magnitude issue is still unknown, we can extract vaccuum or zero-point energy on the minute scale, but can we extract it on the grand scale? we hope to, but that is unknown. I believe NASA is working on a Zero-point engine. Similar to the ionic drive which can barely flutter a piece of paper, running 24 hours a day even minute energy builds a nice potential. Ionic drive only functions in the presence of light/heat from the sun, so has a limited range within the solar system based on distance from the Sun. Zero-point energy could be, theoretically, used for interstellar travel because it exists everywhere.

                              _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                                Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

                                The most common accepted theory is a huge black-hole that blew up

                                Wouldn't that be a white hole? :~

                                Cheers, Vikram.


                                "Life isn't fair, and the world is full of unscrupulous characters. There are things worth fighting for, killing for and dying for, but it's a really small list. Chalk it up to experience, let it go, and move on to the next positive experience in your life." - Christopher Duncan.

                                E Offline
                                E Offline
                                El Corazon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:

                                Wouldn't that be a white hole?

                                not exactly... that would be constantly spewing matter. Think of the event horizon as a bubble's edge and bursting the bubble. :) But then no one was there to watch, so all we can do is theorize based on the end result. :)

                                _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Hamed Musavi

                                  I was wondering about batteries and at the same time about the universe. The universe is moving a long long time, without any stop. Where does the energy come from? Can't we design a system like that using gravity to create a battery with a long long life? I mean creating a moving system using gravity and converting movement to electricity.

                                  //This is not a signature while (I'm_alive) { cout<<"I Love Programming"; }

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Rocky Moore
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Hamed Mosavi wrote:

                                  The universe is moving a long long time, without any stop.

                                  Well, if the universe is still out there :) We only see what the speed of light shows us, so anything beyond now is unknown..

                                  Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: SQL Server Express Warnings & Tips Latest Tech Blog Post: Ready for Internet TV?

                                  H 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Rocky Moore

                                    Hamed Mosavi wrote:

                                    The universe is moving a long long time, without any stop.

                                    Well, if the universe is still out there :) We only see what the speed of light shows us, so anything beyond now is unknown..

                                    Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: SQL Server Express Warnings & Tips Latest Tech Blog Post: Ready for Internet TV?

                                    H Offline
                                    H Offline
                                    Hamed Musavi
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Rocky Moore wrote:

                                    We only see what the speed of light shows us, so anything beyond now is unknown..

                                    I have never thought about it. Very interesting indeed.

                                    //This is not a signature while (I'm_alive) { cout<<"I Love Programming"; }

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups