2 + 2 = 5 ( Silly puzzle of the Day) [SOLUTION ADDED]
-
In a "Real" world, there are a lot of people, who takes 2 with 2 and make it a 5 Well the silly question is, Can a "mathematician in you" also do this ? TAKE two 2's and any number of mathematical operations AND make it EQUAL TO 5 Another question to ponder , Imagine you are standing in front of a mirror, facing it. Raise your left hand. Raise your right hand. Look at your reflection. When you raise your left hand your reflection raises what appears to be his right hand. But when you tilt your head up, your reflection does too, and does not appear to tilt his/her head down. Why is it that the mirror appears to reverse left and right, but not up and down? * there is no genius in google-dept Solution here[^]
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project trackingWhere o where ? Nish, i hope you haven't given up on silly puzzles :) -- modified at 19:06 Friday 26th January, 2007
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
I really wish that only well-worded puzzles were posted. If this is from a book, please post the full, complete, exact text of the puzzle. Plus attribution would help.
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
If this is from a book, please post the full, complete, exact text of the puzzle. Plus attribution would help.
Perhaps the International Puzzle and Gaming Committee should ratify the puzzle, too? :rolleyes:
:josh: My WPF Blog[^]
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act, but a habit. - Aristotle -
Quartz... wrote:
Imagine you are standing in front of a mirror, facing it. Raise your left hand. Raise your right hand.
This sounds like the first chapter to "The Introverts Guide to the Hokey Pokey[^]." :-D
:josh: My WPF Blog[^]
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act, but a habit. - AristotleJosh Smith wrote:
This sounds like the first chapter to "The Introverts Guide to the Hokey Pokey[^]."
Does it ! i have never read that, :laugh::laugh::laugh:
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
Two questions 1. The context is the first question or the second question ? 2. You mean the puzzle is not clear ? Can you help make it clear because thes are not from any book or text, i read that long back and thought to share
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project trackingQuartz... wrote:
1. The context is the first question or the second question ?
Oh, yeah, sorry, the second first... the puzzle. I don't find the first second very interesting.
Quartz... wrote:
2. You mean the puzzle is not clear ? Can you help make it clear because thes are not from any book or text, i read that long back and thought to share
Ah, so you may have left out bits you thought non-essential? Not to get down on you in particular, but any who post puzzles on the Web in general. Plus, many times a puzzle is posted because the poster didn't find the answer, and if that's because he didn't understand the puzzle, then quite likely the resultant post will be garbled and unsolvable. As has been seen on here before. At any rate, of the solutions I've seen posted here so far only
ceil(sqrt(22))
seems to qualify as a "proper" answer. The answers5+5+1
and2+2+2/2
don't qualify, because they break the implied limitation. If you then say "I never implied that", then the puzzle is no longer interesting, because many many solutions are then possible and a puzzle should have one or very few solutions. How about, "I am one with two plus two, that makes five"? Or, "two plus two and a banana makes five"? When I read a puzzle like that (poorly-worded) on the Web I can only assume that the poster left out such details in the interest of brevity, or not realizing the scope of the error, or because he's smoked too much weed. -- modified at 19:51 Friday 26th January, 2007 -
Quartz... wrote:
1. The context is the first question or the second question ?
Oh, yeah, sorry, the second first... the puzzle. I don't find the first second very interesting.
Quartz... wrote:
2. You mean the puzzle is not clear ? Can you help make it clear because thes are not from any book or text, i read that long back and thought to share
Ah, so you may have left out bits you thought non-essential? Not to get down on you in particular, but any who post puzzles on the Web in general. Plus, many times a puzzle is posted because the poster didn't find the answer, and if that's because he didn't understand the puzzle, then quite likely the resultant post will be garbled and unsolvable. As has been seen on here before. At any rate, of the solutions I've seen posted here so far only
ceil(sqrt(22))
seems to qualify as a "proper" answer. The answers5+5+1
and2+2+2/2
don't qualify, because they break the implied limitation. If you then say "I never implied that", then the puzzle is no longer interesting, because many many solutions are then possible and a puzzle should have one or very few solutions. How about, "I am one with two plus two, that makes five"? Or, "two plus two and a banana makes five"? When I read a puzzle like that (poorly-worded) on the Web I can only assume that the poster left out such details in the interest of brevity, or not realizing the scope of the error, or because he's smoked too much weed. -- modified at 19:51 Friday 26th January, 2007i don't think a lot of people here agrees to that, because the question is very simple , just one line and there is no scope of misunderstanding it. i added a bit of confusion to make it difficult to understand on the first place and there is only one MATHEMATICAL ACCURATE solution to it. and i do have the solution to it
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
When I read a puzzle like that (poorly-worded) on the Web I can only assume that the poster left out such details in the interest of brevity, or not realizing the scope of the error, or because he's smoked too much weed.
Very interesting interpretation though
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
i don't think a lot of people here agrees to that, because the question is very simple , just one line and there is no scope of misunderstanding it. i added a bit of confusion to make it difficult to understand on the first place and there is only one MATHEMATICAL ACCURATE solution to it. and i do have the solution to it
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
When I read a puzzle like that (poorly-worded) on the Web I can only assume that the poster left out such details in the interest of brevity, or not realizing the scope of the error, or because he's smoked too much weed.
Very interesting interpretation though
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project trackingQuartz... wrote:
question is very simple
There are no simple questions, only simple questioners. Well, maybe I've seen too many bad puzzles posted, I'll go read it again.
-
i don't think a lot of people here agrees to that, because the question is very simple , just one line and there is no scope of misunderstanding it. i added a bit of confusion to make it difficult to understand on the first place and there is only one MATHEMATICAL ACCURATE solution to it. and i do have the solution to it
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
When I read a puzzle like that (poorly-worded) on the Web I can only assume that the poster left out such details in the interest of brevity, or not realizing the scope of the error, or because he's smoked too much weed.
Very interesting interpretation though
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project trackingOK, I reread it again. If indeed
Quartz... wrote:
the question is very simple , just one line and there is no scope of misunderstanding it
and the only question there is
Can a "mathematician in you" also do this ?
then, my answer is, "Yes". But that doesn't satisfyQuartz... wrote:
there is only one MATHEMATICAL ACCURATE solution to it
So, perhaps the answer you seek is, "No". At any rate, ask the question without
Quartz... wrote:
added a bit of confusion to make it difficult to understand on the first place
because otherwise I must assume you've smoked too much weed.
-
In a "Real" world, there are a lot of people, who takes 2 with 2 and make it a 5 Well the silly question is, Can a "mathematician in you" also do this ? TAKE two 2's and any number of mathematical operations AND make it EQUAL TO 5 Another question to ponder , Imagine you are standing in front of a mirror, facing it. Raise your left hand. Raise your right hand. Look at your reflection. When you raise your left hand your reflection raises what appears to be his right hand. But when you tilt your head up, your reflection does too, and does not appear to tilt his/her head down. Why is it that the mirror appears to reverse left and right, but not up and down? * there is no genius in google-dept Solution here[^]
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
In a "Real" world, there are a lot of people, who takes 2 with 2 and make it a 5 Well the silly question is, Can a "mathematician in you" also do this ? TAKE two 2's and any number of mathematical operations AND make it EQUAL TO 5 Another question to ponder , Imagine you are standing in front of a mirror, facing it. Raise your left hand. Raise your right hand. Look at your reflection. When you raise your left hand your reflection raises what appears to be his right hand. But when you tilt your head up, your reflection does too, and does not appear to tilt his/her head down. Why is it that the mirror appears to reverse left and right, but not up and down? * there is no genius in google-dept Solution here[^]
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project trackingIst one sqrt( (.2) ^ (-2) ) [^] i can hear your "huh!" 2nd one as some of you have already guessed the mirror just reflect and our eye see the image horizontally . The reason why it appears to reverse left/right is because of the symmetry of our body. nice weekend
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
Out of curiosity, where are all these puzzles coming from? Have you bought a book?
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
Quartz... wrote:
In a "Real" world, there are a lot of people, who takes 2 with 2 and make it a 5
Use extreamly large values of 2! Joe Q
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
Quartz... wrote:
Why is it that the mirror appears to reverse left and right, but not up and down?
The mirror doesn't rotate anything. It reflects the image back without any rotation about any axis. A human observer looking at you from the mirrors location would have to rotate about his vertical axis, thus reversing his left and right from your perspective
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
Quartz... wrote:
But when you tilt your head up, your reflection does too, and does not appear to tilt his/her head down. Why is it that the mirror appears to reverse left and right, but not up and down?
looking into a flat mirror reverses the Z axis, mentally: what points at the mirror in real life points out in the reflection. so we assume the reflection is of a person facing us, which would put his right arm on our left side, because that's true for real people facing us... but, it's not a person facing us, and it doesn't actually swap left and right. and it doesn't appear to swap up and down because we don't assume people facing us are upside down. but we do assume people facing us have their left on our right. we're just fooled by our assumptions.
Quartz... wrote:
2 with 2 and make it a 5
no time for such foolishness. it's 5:30! time to go home!
image processing toolkits | batch image processing | blogging
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
Can't remember the exact solution but I'm pretty sure it involves multiplying by infinity, adding something or other (because infinity + x is infinity) then cancelling out the infinities resulting in the imbalanced equation. I think anyway :scratches head:
I have no idea what I just said. But my intentions were sincere.
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
i haven't checked that but seems to be a good solution if it is accurate Solution here[^]
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
I really wish that only well-worded puzzles were posted. If this is from a book, please post the full, complete, exact text of the puzzle. Plus attribution would help.
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking -
In a "Real" world, there are a lot of people, who takes 2 with 2 and make it a 5 Well the silly question is, Can a "mathematician in you" also do this ? TAKE two 2's and any number of mathematical operations AND make it EQUAL TO 5 Another question to ponder , Imagine you are standing in front of a mirror, facing it. Raise your left hand. Raise your right hand. Look at your reflection. When you raise your left hand your reflection raises what appears to be his right hand. But when you tilt your head up, your reflection does too, and does not appear to tilt his/her head down. Why is it that the mirror appears to reverse left and right, but not up and down? * there is no genius in google-dept Solution here[^]
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project trackingQuartz... wrote:
TAKE two 2's and any number of mathematical operations AND make it EQUAL TO 5
:zzz: log4^(1/5)(2+2) = 5 :cool: or, I think you could define group with only {2}, and call zero element "5". Then 2-2 = 5 :D
"Throughout human history, we have been dependent on machines to survive. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony. " - Morpheus
-
Ist one sqrt( (.2) ^ (-2) ) [^] i can hear your "huh!" 2nd one as some of you have already guessed the mirror just reflect and our eye see the image horizontally . The reason why it appears to reverse left/right is because of the symmetry of our body. nice weekend
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project trackingQuartz... wrote:
The reason why it appears to reverse left/right is because of the symmetry of our body.
Symmetry has nothing to do with it. Perspective has everything to do with it.
-
Ist one sqrt( (.2) ^ (-2) ) [^] i can hear your "huh!" 2nd one as some of you have already guessed the mirror just reflect and our eye see the image horizontally . The reason why it appears to reverse left/right is because of the symmetry of our body. nice weekend
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project trackingUm, where's the +? Besides what's so strange about that one? .2 = 1/5 (1/5)^(-2) = 5^2 sqrt(25)=5 The one I was on about is where there's a proof that 1=2.
I have no idea what I just said. But my intentions were sincere.
-
In a "Real" world, there are a lot of people, who takes 2 with 2 and make it a 5 Well the silly question is, Can a "mathematician in you" also do this ? TAKE two 2's and any number of mathematical operations AND make it EQUAL TO 5 Another question to ponder , Imagine you are standing in front of a mirror, facing it. Raise your left hand. Raise your right hand. Look at your reflection. When you raise your left hand your reflection raises what appears to be his right hand. But when you tilt your head up, your reflection does too, and does not appear to tilt his/her head down. Why is it that the mirror appears to reverse left and right, but not up and down? * there is no genius in google-dept Solution here[^]
Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.
JumpyForum:CP Message board | Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree | | Globalization in 20 minutes
Web based project tracking