Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Question about one's Status

Question about one's Status

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
28 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    Programm3r
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi all, OK, so today I have become a one year member of the Code Project, but my status still says, Bronze. And I mean at the bottom of the page it states the following: "..and if a user has posted a message then each year of membership adds 1 level.." I have posted a message before (447). Can anyone inform me why?? Many thanx Regards,


    The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

    J A 1 S realJSOPR 7 Replies Last reply
    0
    • P Programm3r

      Hi all, OK, so today I have become a one year member of the Code Project, but my status still says, Bronze. And I mean at the bottom of the page it states the following: "..and if a user has posted a message then each year of membership adds 1 level.." I have posted a message before (447). Can anyone inform me why?? Many thanx Regards,


      The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jon Sagara
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      IIRC, status updates occur as part of a periodic (weekly?) job, so yours should update soon.

      Jon Sagara Laziness is nothing more than the habit of resting before you get tired. -- Unknown Blog | Site | Articles

      P C 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P Programm3r

        Hi all, OK, so today I have become a one year member of the Code Project, but my status still says, Bronze. And I mean at the bottom of the page it states the following: "..and if a user has posted a message then each year of membership adds 1 level.." I have posted a message before (447). Can anyone inform me why?? Many thanx Regards,


        The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

        1 Offline
        1 Offline
        123 0
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Programm3r wrote:

        The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's.....

        That's us!

        P T 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • P Programm3r

          Hi all, OK, so today I have become a one year member of the Code Project, but my status still says, Bronze. And I mean at the bottom of the page it states the following: "..and if a user has posted a message then each year of membership adds 1 level.." I have posted a message before (447). Can anyone inform me why?? Many thanx Regards,


          The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Anish M
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Do what you do for the love of it, Enjoy!... the rest will happen in its own

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jon Sagara

            IIRC, status updates occur as part of a periodic (weekly?) job, so yours should update soon.

            Jon Sagara Laziness is nothing more than the habit of resting before you get tired. -- Unknown Blog | Site | Articles

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Programm3r
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Thank you very much, was not aware of that.


            The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Anish M

              Do what you do for the love of it, Enjoy!... the rest will happen in its own

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Programm3r
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              ok ... :wtf::omg:

              The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 1 123 0

                Programm3r wrote:

                The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's.....

                That's us!

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Programm3r
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                :cool: :->

                The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

                1 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Programm3r

                  :cool: :->

                  The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

                  1 Offline
                  1 Offline
                  123 0
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  In case you're interested, here's what I meant. When my son and I were developing our Plain English compiler we needed - as you might expect - to generate some actual machine code at various points. Being minimalists, however, and determined to use as little of the monstrous Intel instruction set as possible, we decided not to use (or include) an inline assembler. Fortunately, my son had developed the ability to convert logical descriptions of machine operations into the appropriate bits - using nothing but two relatively small charts from the Intel documentation. I'd say something like, "Okay, grab the third parameter on the stack and stick it in the ECX register," and, after a few seconds with his charts, he would rattle off the appropriate bit pattern in hex. It amazes me to this day.

                  P N L 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • 1 123 0

                    In case you're interested, here's what I meant. When my son and I were developing our Plain English compiler we needed - as you might expect - to generate some actual machine code at various points. Being minimalists, however, and determined to use as little of the monstrous Intel instruction set as possible, we decided not to use (or include) an inline assembler. Fortunately, my son had developed the ability to convert logical descriptions of machine operations into the appropriate bits - using nothing but two relatively small charts from the Intel documentation. I'd say something like, "Okay, grab the third parameter on the stack and stick it in the ECX register," and, after a few seconds with his charts, he would rattle off the appropriate bit pattern in hex. It amazes me to this day.

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    Programm3r
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    :~ WOW ... Ok, sounds a bit difficult, I presume that your son didn't finish it in one day .. :)

                    The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

                    1 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Programm3r

                      Hi all, OK, so today I have become a one year member of the Code Project, but my status still says, Bronze. And I mean at the bottom of the page it states the following: "..and if a user has posted a message then each year of membership adds 1 level.." I have posted a message before (447). Can anyone inform me why?? Many thanx Regards,


                      The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Smith
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Wishes.

                      :beer:

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Programm3r

                        :~ WOW ... Ok, sounds a bit difficult, I presume that your son didn't finish it in one day .. :)

                        The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

                        1 Offline
                        1 Offline
                        123 0
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Programm3r wrote:

                        Ok, sounds a bit difficult, I presume that your son didn't finish it in one day ..

                        We worked in tandem the whole project - two keyboards, two mice, and four monitors hooked to a single computer. I used one monitor; for some reason that I didn't question, he seemed to think three was the right number for him. Either I would type and he would mouse, or vice-versa (depending on who knew where we were going that day). The thing went through 67 major revisions before release and took about four years to design and six months to code. Here's a sample of one of the compiler routines that has some of his in-the-head-assembly results in it. It's the routine that generates the machine code for a pointer dereference: To transmogrify a fragment (dereference): Attach $8B95 and the fragment's variable's offset to the fragment's code. \ mov edx,[ebp+the fragment's variable's offset] Attach $8B12 to the fragment's code. \ mov edx,[edx] Attach $8995 and the fragment's variable's offset to the fragment's code. \ mov [ebp+the fragment's variable's offset],edx Hexadecimal literals are preceded with a dollar sign ($). The semi-standard Intel assembler instructions (after the backslashes) are comments only. The rest of the stuff is Plain English (this version of the compiler was written using the previous version). The verb - transmogrify - we thought especially appropriate considering that the target was Intel machine code. Here's[^] the definition.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • 1 123 0

                          Programm3r wrote:

                          Ok, sounds a bit difficult, I presume that your son didn't finish it in one day ..

                          We worked in tandem the whole project - two keyboards, two mice, and four monitors hooked to a single computer. I used one monitor; for some reason that I didn't question, he seemed to think three was the right number for him. Either I would type and he would mouse, or vice-versa (depending on who knew where we were going that day). The thing went through 67 major revisions before release and took about four years to design and six months to code. Here's a sample of one of the compiler routines that has some of his in-the-head-assembly results in it. It's the routine that generates the machine code for a pointer dereference: To transmogrify a fragment (dereference): Attach $8B95 and the fragment's variable's offset to the fragment's code. \ mov edx,[ebp+the fragment's variable's offset] Attach $8B12 to the fragment's code. \ mov edx,[edx] Attach $8995 and the fragment's variable's offset to the fragment's code. \ mov [ebp+the fragment's variable's offset],edx Hexadecimal literals are preceded with a dollar sign ($). The semi-standard Intel assembler instructions (after the backslashes) are comments only. The rest of the stuff is Plain English (this version of the compiler was written using the previous version). The verb - transmogrify - we thought especially appropriate considering that the target was Intel machine code. Here's[^] the definition.

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Smith
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Our compiler was built using "pure" assembly?

                          :beer:

                          1 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Smith

                            Our compiler was built using "pure" assembly?

                            :beer:

                            1 Offline
                            1 Offline
                            123 0
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Meat Loaf wrote:

                            Our compiler was built using "pure" assembly?

                            Not sure what you mean there.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P Programm3r

                              Hi all, OK, so today I have become a one year member of the Code Project, but my status still says, Bronze. And I mean at the bottom of the page it states the following: "..and if a user has posted a message then each year of membership adds 1 level.." I have posted a message before (447). Can anyone inform me why?? Many thanx Regards,


                              The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

                              realJSOPR Online
                              realJSOPR Online
                              realJSOP
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Maybe Chris has finally fixed it. I'm one of the users that thinks it should be HARDER to get bumped up a level, and that tenure should not be a consideration. -- modified at 8:51 Thursday 1st March, 2007 The really funny part of the current vote tally for this post is that the idiots that vote "1"s probably have to look up the meaning of "tenure".

                              "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                              -----
                              "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • 1 123 0

                                Programm3r wrote:

                                The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's.....

                                That's us!

                                T Offline
                                T Offline
                                ThatsAlok
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                The Grand Negus wrote:

                                hat's us!

                                how come!

                                "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow

                                cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV Support CRY- Child Relief and You

                                1 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P Programm3r

                                  Hi all, OK, so today I have become a one year member of the Code Project, but my status still says, Bronze. And I mean at the bottom of the page it states the following: "..and if a user has posted a message then each year of membership adds 1 level.." I have posted a message before (447). Can anyone inform me why?? Many thanx Regards,


                                  The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r

                                  P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  prasad_som
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Programm3r wrote:

                                  I have become a one year member of the Code Project,

                                  still 21 days are there to complete it. :)

                                  Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P prasad_som

                                    Programm3r wrote:

                                    I have become a one year member of the Code Project,

                                    still 21 days are there to complete it. :)

                                    Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Programm3r
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    What is 21 days between programmers ?? :confused: :-D


                                    The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r
                                    My Blog: ^_^

                                    D realJSOPR 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Jon Sagara

                                      IIRC, status updates occur as part of a periodic (weekly?) job, so yours should update soon.

                                      Jon Sagara Laziness is nothing more than the habit of resting before you get tired. -- Unknown Blog | Site | Articles

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      cyberpunk_np
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Desparately waiting for an update [I know I've posted >15 messages, yet am only a lurker???:doh:

                                      ========================================================================================= "UNIX is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P Programm3r

                                        What is 21 days between programmers ?? :confused: :-D


                                        The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :) Programm3r
                                        My Blog: ^_^

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        DavidNohejl
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Programm3r wrote:

                                        What is 21

                                        Half of 42, of course!


                                        "Throughout human history, we have been dependent on machines to survive. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony. " - Morpheus

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • 1 123 0

                                          In case you're interested, here's what I meant. When my son and I were developing our Plain English compiler we needed - as you might expect - to generate some actual machine code at various points. Being minimalists, however, and determined to use as little of the monstrous Intel instruction set as possible, we decided not to use (or include) an inline assembler. Fortunately, my son had developed the ability to convert logical descriptions of machine operations into the appropriate bits - using nothing but two relatively small charts from the Intel documentation. I'd say something like, "Okay, grab the third parameter on the stack and stick it in the ECX register," and, after a few seconds with his charts, he would rattle off the appropriate bit pattern in hex. It amazes me to this day.

                                          N Offline
                                          N Offline
                                          Nish Nishant
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          The Grand Negus wrote:

                                          When my son and I were developing our Plain English compiler

                                          Isn't your son a baby? Or do you have an older son?

                                          Regards, Nish


                                          Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                                          Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications. (*Sample chapter available online*)

                                          1 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups