Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Stop whining

Stop whining

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
60 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Red Stateler

    Shog9 wrote:

    I understand the yearning for a Fearless Leader to put your hopes in

    I for one don't want a "leader". I want a government that implements my ideals.

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Shog9 0
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Red Stateler wrote:

    I want a government that implements my ideals.

    You want a servant. So look for people who are good at following orders. ...and pray they take orders from the people who elected them instead of the people who funded their ad campaigns...

    ----

    It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.

    --Raymond Chen on MSDN

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Red Stateler

      Shog9 wrote:

      I understand the yearning for a Fearless Leader to put your hopes in

      I for one don't want a "leader". I want a government that implements my ideals.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      What about other people's ideals? Don't they count, whatever they are.

      R I 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • S Shog9 0

        Look. I understand the yearning for a Fearless Leader to put your hopes in... but can we just accept that it's not gonna be someone emerging from this system? Face it - you don't get to where Bush is, or Clinton was, or Rudy/Clinton/Obama want to be without trading something for it, and unless you're just rolling in money going in, that "something" is gonna be yourself. They're all whores. Fancy, expensive whores, and hey, maybe the one you're backing really does have that heart of gold... but, they're still whores, and that's all you can expect of 'em. So enough acting shocked at the hypocrisy, the lies, the ludicrous gimmicks. It's all an act, a cheesy improv designed by us - because we know they're whores, but still want to see 'em pretending to be honest, upstanding citizens, a prancing mockery of a fiction whose origins we barely even recall. Stop chiding the whores for acting like whores. Start chiding yourselves for buying them. (and no, this isn't directed specifically at you, Mike - i just didn't feel like starting a new thread)

        ----

        It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.

        --Raymond Chen on MSDN

        L Offline
        L Offline
        led mike
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        Shog9 wrote:

        Start chiding yourselves for buying them.

        Of course "I" don't and I posted as much last week[^]

        Shog9 wrote:

        Stop chiding the whores for acting like whores.

        Yeah, I could care less what any of those washington pukes do or say... but the people here in the Soapbox, that's another fish to fry. :-D

        Last modified: 3hrs 38mins after originally posted --

        led mike

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          What about other people's ideals? Don't they count, whatever they are.

          I Offline
          I Offline
          Ilion
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

          What about other people's ideals? Don't they count, whatever they are.

          Considering the context, I suppose I don't really care about this particular "misunderstanding."

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L led mike

            What is all this whining about a double standard? The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority... then you want to whine about a double standard. Please could just one republican in the Soapbox please step forward and explain the logic in this seemingly inescapable contradiction? And no, this does not mean that someone like Ilion should post another list of Democratic leaders and their misadventures as if there is no list of Republican leaders misadventures.

            led mike

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stan Shannon
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            led mike wrote:

            The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority...

            That very comment is an example of the double standard.

            Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about

            I L 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • S Stan Shannon

              led mike wrote:

              The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority...

              That very comment is an example of the double standard.

              Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about

              I Offline
              I Offline
              Ilion
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              That very comment is an example of the double standard.

              AND misrepresentation.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                led mike wrote:

                The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority...

                That very comment is an example of the double standard.

                Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about

                L Offline
                L Offline
                led mike
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                That very comment is an example of the double standard.

                Are you serious? Another whine is your response? Did I ask for an example? Did I even question the existence of the double standard? Not a single one of you has even attempted to address the question. You have proven, once again, that beyond regurgitating your own brainwashed superiority rhetoric, you have no capability for real discussion.

                led mike

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L led mike

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  That very comment is an example of the double standard.

                  Are you serious? Another whine is your response? Did I ask for an example? Did I even question the existence of the double standard? Not a single one of you has even attempted to address the question. You have proven, once again, that beyond regurgitating your own brainwashed superiority rhetoric, you have no capability for real discussion.

                  led mike

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Red Stateler
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  led mike wrote:

                  Not a single one of you has even attempted to address the question.

                  I'm still trying to understand your question. You asked "What's with all the whining about a double standard", then went on to say that Republicans have a double standard for promoting "family values". I told you they don't since a violation of that standard generally results in removal (rather than promotions that Democrats get). You failed to respond to that comment because it brings down your argument. Now you're accusing people of having no capability for a real discussion. Wow.

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Red Stateler

                    Shog9 wrote:

                    I understand the yearning for a Fearless Leader to put your hopes in

                    I for one don't want a "leader". I want a government that implements my ideals.

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Al Beback
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    Red Stateler wrote:

                    I for one don't want a "leader". I want a government that implements my ideals.

                    Yes, but the government is made of people. And those people need leaders to help them translate our ideals into action.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • 7 73Zeppelin

                      Stop wasting your time with this moron. Ignore him. It's not hard to figure out he craves attention. Deny him what he so desperately wants or continue to suffer through his pathetic, rambling posts.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      David Wulff
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #24

                      I just went back to see what he has posted since last night, so I'd know what to vote as spam the next time round, and most of his messages have been removed. :doh:


                      Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
                      Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
                      I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk

                      7 I 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • R Red Stateler

                        led mike wrote:

                        Not a single one of you has even attempted to address the question.

                        I'm still trying to understand your question. You asked "What's with all the whining about a double standard", then went on to say that Republicans have a double standard for promoting "family values". I told you they don't since a violation of that standard generally results in removal (rather than promotions that Democrats get). You failed to respond to that comment because it brings down your argument. Now you're accusing people of having no capability for a real discussion. Wow.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        led mike
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #25

                        Red Stateler wrote:

                        I'm still trying to understand your question.

                        No you are not.

                        Red Stateler wrote:

                        then went on to say that Republicans have a double standard for promoting "family values".

                        I said that in my OP on this thread? Where? Here is my statement, it does not say what you claim:

                        led mike wrote:

                        The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority... then you want to whine about a double standard.

                        now here is the question

                        led mike wrote:

                        explain the logic in this seemingly inescapable contradiction?

                        How is that NOT crystal clear? You always claim to have superior reading skills don't you?

                        led mike

                        S R 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • R Red Stateler

                          Shog9 wrote:

                          You want a servant. So look for people who are good at following orders. ...and pray they take orders from the people who elected them instead of the people who funded their ad campaigns...

                          I want a public servant, but that doesn't imply someone who simply takes orders, but rather fulfills the duties of their office for the benefit of America.

                          I Offline
                          I Offline
                          IdUnknown
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #26

                          That's the ideal leader everyone would want, but it's only a dream. Like those people who tried to achieve communism, the idea is good, but it is impossible to achieve; the closest that they got is national socialism. Anyway, I don't think there is another George Washington or James Madison that will come along and save us. The constant growth of the bureaucracy in the government and the military industrial complex, and along with the influence of corporations in the legislating process has killed any chance of anyone trying to do the right thing. Well, unless there's a revolution and we start over again and implement the lessons learned. After awhile, the process would have to start over again and it becomes a cycle. Just my $0.02

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L led mike

                            Red Stateler wrote:

                            I'm still trying to understand your question.

                            No you are not.

                            Red Stateler wrote:

                            then went on to say that Republicans have a double standard for promoting "family values".

                            I said that in my OP on this thread? Where? Here is my statement, it does not say what you claim:

                            led mike wrote:

                            The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority... then you want to whine about a double standard.

                            now here is the question

                            led mike wrote:

                            explain the logic in this seemingly inescapable contradiction?

                            How is that NOT crystal clear? You always claim to have superior reading skills don't you?

                            led mike

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Stan Shannon
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #27

                            led mike wrote:

                            led mike wrote: The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority... then you want to whine about a double standard. now here is the question

                            Because that statement is not true, hence there is no contradiction. Quoteing leftist propaganda is not a compelling argument.

                            Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L led mike

                              Red Stateler wrote:

                              I'm still trying to understand your question.

                              No you are not.

                              Red Stateler wrote:

                              then went on to say that Republicans have a double standard for promoting "family values".

                              I said that in my OP on this thread? Where? Here is my statement, it does not say what you claim:

                              led mike wrote:

                              The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority... then you want to whine about a double standard.

                              now here is the question

                              led mike wrote:

                              explain the logic in this seemingly inescapable contradiction?

                              How is that NOT crystal clear? You always claim to have superior reading skills don't you?

                              led mike

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Red Stateler
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #28

                              Like Stan said, the only way your statement makes sense is if there is a contradiction there. And as I pointed out, there isn't one, which makes your statement meaningless. That's why I asked what you were talking about.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • I Ilion

                                But Honest Mike, I answered the "question" I care about.

                                U Offline
                                U Offline
                                Unregistered User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #29

                                Dont talk to this infadel, One day he will be begging you for a drop of water on his tounge when he is burning in hell! :rolleyes:

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Stan Shannon

                                  led mike wrote:

                                  led mike wrote: The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority... then you want to whine about a double standard. now here is the question

                                  Because that statement is not true, hence there is no contradiction. Quoteing leftist propaganda is not a compelling argument.

                                  Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  led mike
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #30

                                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                                  Because that statement is not true

                                  Hmmm... ok I'll bite. Which part is not true? 1) The Republican Platform of Religion and Family Values 2) Republicans in the Soapbox claiming moral superiority 3) Republicans in the Soapbox whining about a double standard

                                  led mike

                                  R S 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L led mike

                                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                                    Because that statement is not true

                                    Hmmm... ok I'll bite. Which part is not true? 1) The Republican Platform of Religion and Family Values 2) Republicans in the Soapbox claiming moral superiority 3) Republicans in the Soapbox whining about a double standard

                                    led mike

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Red Stateler
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #31

                                    Your statement:

                                    led mike wrote:

                                    The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority... then you want to whine about a double standard.

                                    The word "then" makes the underlined portion a statement of contradiction. It indicates that claiming moral superiority denotes that conservatives are exempted from whining about a double standard (presumably because it's hypocritical...the only liberal vice). But in order to make any sense (within the contect of your hypocritical implication), conservatives would have to be violating that moral standard. As I pointed out in my first response, the fact that conservatives commit immoral acts is expected. But the standard requires action on those immoral acts...Something conservatives are consistent about. That fact contradicts your claims of hypocrisy because there is no demonstrably lacking morality, which renders your statement moot. That's why I asked what you were talking about when you continued rambling. Btw, Stan is saying that leftists claim a moral superiority via their secular humanist morality (e.g. war is immoral, republicans are corrupt, etc...).

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Red Stateler

                                      Your statement:

                                      led mike wrote:

                                      The Republicans have the platform of Religion and Family Values, constantly claiming moral superiority... then you want to whine about a double standard.

                                      The word "then" makes the underlined portion a statement of contradiction. It indicates that claiming moral superiority denotes that conservatives are exempted from whining about a double standard (presumably because it's hypocritical...the only liberal vice). But in order to make any sense (within the contect of your hypocritical implication), conservatives would have to be violating that moral standard. As I pointed out in my first response, the fact that conservatives commit immoral acts is expected. But the standard requires action on those immoral acts...Something conservatives are consistent about. That fact contradicts your claims of hypocrisy because there is no demonstrably lacking morality, which renders your statement moot. That's why I asked what you were talking about when you continued rambling. Btw, Stan is saying that leftists claim a moral superiority via their secular humanist morality (e.g. war is immoral, republicans are corrupt, etc...).

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      led mike
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #32

                                      Red Stateler wrote:

                                      But in order to make any sense (within the contect of your hypocritical implication), conservatives would have to be violating that moral standard.

                                      This thread is not about hypocrisy, we can always get back to that, it is simply about "STOP WHINING" about the double standard.

                                      Red Stateler wrote:

                                      Btw, Stan is saying that leftists claim a moral superiority

                                      Yeah you two say all sorts of things you can't back up, so what?

                                      led mike

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L led mike

                                        Red Stateler wrote:

                                        But in order to make any sense (within the contect of your hypocritical implication), conservatives would have to be violating that moral standard.

                                        This thread is not about hypocrisy, we can always get back to that, it is simply about "STOP WHINING" about the double standard.

                                        Red Stateler wrote:

                                        Btw, Stan is saying that leftists claim a moral superiority

                                        Yeah you two say all sorts of things you can't back up, so what?

                                        led mike

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Red Stateler
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #33

                                        led mike wrote:

                                        This thread is not about hypocrisy, we can always get back to that, it is simply about "STOP WHINING" about the double standard.

                                        Well then back to the original question. What are you rambling on about? You original posts makes absolutely no sense. It doesn't even imply "stop whining" just because you're annoyed of your blatant hypocrisy.

                                        led mike wrote:

                                        Yeah you two say all sorts of things you can't back up, so what?

                                        Yeah, I gave you two specific examples.

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Red Stateler

                                          led mike wrote:

                                          This thread is not about hypocrisy, we can always get back to that, it is simply about "STOP WHINING" about the double standard.

                                          Well then back to the original question. What are you rambling on about? You original posts makes absolutely no sense. It doesn't even imply "stop whining" just because you're annoyed of your blatant hypocrisy.

                                          led mike wrote:

                                          Yeah you two say all sorts of things you can't back up, so what?

                                          Yeah, I gave you two specific examples.

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          led mike
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #34

                                          Red Stateler wrote:

                                          Yeah, I gave you two specific examples.

                                          Examples of what? Examples of how it's logical to whine about a double standard that you set up yourself? WTF are you talking about?

                                          led mike

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups