MS RDP lol
-
lol, i accidentally mistyped an IP: 192.168.0.1117 instead of 192.168.0.117:doh: it took it some time to realize it cant connect to that.:rolleyes: ie, it sat tehre waiting to connect then said cannot connect to remote computer. heh. really, you THINK SO?
:badger:
-
lol, i accidentally mistyped an IP: 192.168.0.1117 instead of 192.168.0.117:doh: it took it some time to realize it cant connect to that.:rolleyes: ie, it sat tehre waiting to connect then said cannot connect to remote computer. heh. really, you THINK SO?
:badger:
I kept trying to remote-connect from vista to my old XP box and it never would work. I just gave up and one day it hit me - duh, the firewall...
-
lol, i accidentally mistyped an IP: 192.168.0.1117 instead of 192.168.0.117:doh: it took it some time to realize it cant connect to that.:rolleyes: ie, it sat tehre waiting to connect then said cannot connect to remote computer. heh. really, you THINK SO?
:badger:
99.9% of all TCP clients will do the same thing. They will first attempt to decode the entry as an IP address using
inet_addr
. If that fails, getting a return value ofINADDR_NONE
, it'll then look up the name in DNS withgethostbyname
. If that returns an address - which might happen if there's a wildcard in DNS, which there seems to be in.co.uk
- then the client will try to connect to that address. If the address isn't actually contactable, it'll then wait for the TCP connect timeout - which is typically two minutes - before failing.Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder
-
lol, i accidentally mistyped an IP: 192.168.0.1117 instead of 192.168.0.117:doh: it took it some time to realize it cant connect to that.:rolleyes: ie, it sat tehre waiting to connect then said cannot connect to remote computer. heh. really, you THINK SO?
:badger:
-
lol, i accidentally mistyped an IP: 192.168.0.1117 instead of 192.168.0.117:doh: it took it some time to realize it cant connect to that.:rolleyes: ie, it sat tehre waiting to connect then said cannot connect to remote computer. heh. really, you THINK SO?
:badger:
Anton Afanasyev wrote:
192.168.0.1117
RDP should have been bit smarter and alerted you "Did you mean 01.117"?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips