Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. .NET (Core and Framework)
  4. .NET 3.0 installation

.NET 3.0 installation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved .NET (Core and Framework)
csharpvisual-studio
7 Posts 4 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    code_wiz
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi, I am currently using VS 2005 (.NET 2.0) and want to install the .NET 3.0 framework and start working on it. I have installed the .NET 3.0 Now i am told that i will need to install the Windows SDK and .NET 3.0 components and then install the VS 2005 extensions for the .NET 3.0 When reading through the Windows SDK install link in MS site, it is suggesting to do several things, including un-installing the current Windows SDK and also says there are several known issues around this install. It is also asking to uninstall existing stuff like Document explorer etc. which i use with VS 2005 (for documentation). And the list of things to do looks pretty long :-( The current machine is my production machine where i develop 2.0 based apps / controls and i want to be careful when installing the 3.0, especially the Windows SDK. Can anybody share their experience on this bit - i.e. the Windows SDK instalaation bit. Oncei get over this step, i can happily install the 3rd bit - i.e. the VS extensions for .NET 3.0 :-) and have fun with .NET 3.0 fluff :-)

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C code_wiz

      Hi, I am currently using VS 2005 (.NET 2.0) and want to install the .NET 3.0 framework and start working on it. I have installed the .NET 3.0 Now i am told that i will need to install the Windows SDK and .NET 3.0 components and then install the VS 2005 extensions for the .NET 3.0 When reading through the Windows SDK install link in MS site, it is suggesting to do several things, including un-installing the current Windows SDK and also says there are several known issues around this install. It is also asking to uninstall existing stuff like Document explorer etc. which i use with VS 2005 (for documentation). And the list of things to do looks pretty long :-( The current machine is my production machine where i develop 2.0 based apps / controls and i want to be careful when installing the 3.0, especially the Windows SDK. Can anybody share their experience on this bit - i.e. the Windows SDK instalaation bit. Oncei get over this step, i can happily install the 3rd bit - i.e. the VS extensions for .NET 3.0 :-) and have fun with .NET 3.0 fluff :-)

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Dave Kreskowiak
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      If your just going to play with .NET 3.0 don't install it on your production machine. Install something like VirtualPC, install Windows on a new virtual machine, then Visual Studio .NET 2005 and all the .NET stuff. That way, you can play all you want safely without screwing up your production environment.

      Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
           2006, 2007

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Dave Kreskowiak

        If your just going to play with .NET 3.0 don't install it on your production machine. Install something like VirtualPC, install Windows on a new virtual machine, then Visual Studio .NET 2005 and all the .NET stuff. That way, you can play all you want safely without screwing up your production environment.

        Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
             2006, 2007

        D Offline
        D Offline
        DotNetInterest
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        "That way, you can play all you want safely without screwing up your production environment." Why??? Is .NET 3.0 not RTM'ed yet? It is RTM!!!!!! I would be worried only if it was a RCs or Betas, but with RTM release, MS should ensure that it does not screw up any production environment, especially the .NET 2.0 system. If they cannot assure that, they should not be releasing .NET 3.0 as RTM at all. They should keep it as Beta if the developer community will have to be cautious to use it in production machines running 2.0 framework (or use it via Vistual PC etc.).

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D DotNetInterest

          "That way, you can play all you want safely without screwing up your production environment." Why??? Is .NET 3.0 not RTM'ed yet? It is RTM!!!!!! I would be worried only if it was a RCs or Betas, but with RTM release, MS should ensure that it does not screw up any production environment, especially the .NET 2.0 system. If they cannot assure that, they should not be releasing .NET 3.0 as RTM at all. They should keep it as Beta if the developer community will have to be cautious to use it in production machines running 2.0 framework (or use it via Vistual PC etc.).

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Pete OHanlon
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          While .NET 3 is release, some of the Visual Studio extensions are CTP.

          Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Pete OHanlon

            While .NET 3 is release, some of the Visual Studio extensions are CTP.

            Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

            D Offline
            D Offline
            DotNetInterest
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Ahh! That explains the fear! Thanks. :-)

            P D 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • D DotNetInterest

              Ahh! That explains the fear! Thanks. :-)

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Pete OHanlon
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Glad to help.

              Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D DotNetInterest

                Ahh! That explains the fear! Thanks. :-)

                D Offline
                D Offline
                Dave Kreskowiak
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                It's not so much fear. It's also the fact that you can easily screw up writing code that works fine under .NET 3.0, but will screw over his .NET 2.0 project if needs to make updates to it. If you still have to maintain that .NET 2.0 codebase you're better off dedicating one development environment to developing for .NET 2.0 and another for .NET 3.0.

                Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
                     2006, 2007

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups