Most egregious form of state sanctioned murder

Red Stateler

:cool: I find this telling:

"Today's decision is alarming," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in dissent. She
said the ruling "refuses to take ... seriously" previous Supreme Court decisions on
abortion.

I have two questions for her: 1. Why should the precedent of a ruling that was not based in any constitutional law transcend the constitution? 2. What does she think about the Dred Scott Case[^]?

Mike Gaskey

Red Stateler wrote:

1. Why should the precedent of a ruling that was not based in any constitutional law transcend the constitution?

Remember dear Ruth looks to Europe for her legal opinions, not the Constituition.

Red Stateler wrote:

2. What does she think about the Dred Scott Case[^]?

Now you're just trying to confuse her.

Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

Ed Gadziemski

Good for them. Maybe this will lead to the end of abortion. We also need to step up efforts to outlaw capital punishment.

Red Stateler

Ed Gadziemski wrote:

We also need to step up efforts to outlaw capital punishment

You're welcome to do that at a state level. Oddly, there is not a supreme court decision that says states do not have the right to outlaw capital punishment.

PhillArx

Its up to women what they decide about their own bodies and whether they should be forced to give birth or not of course not up to men who will never be in that situation anyway and so cannot make judgement regarding the same. Phill

Stan Shannon

PhillArx wrote:

Its up to women what they decide about their own bodies and whether they should be forced to give birth or not of course not up to men who will never be in that situation anyway and so cannot make judgement regarding the same.

But don't you think that is an opinion that should be settled democratically, instead of being imposed by judicial fiat?

Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about

Mike Gaskey

I don't give a flying fuck what a woman does to her body, it is the child I'm concerned with. any woman who knowingly solicits someone to crush the skull of an unborn child should be stoned.

Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

Vega02

For anybody interested, here's a link of one woman's story regarding PBA. The issue isn't as black-and-white as most people would have us believe. http://lifestyle.msn.com/mindbodyandsoul/womenintheworld/articlemc.aspx?cp-documentid=4595719[^]

eggsovereasy

Then I want to decide if I have to pay for a child I had no say in the birth of. Lets see.. I want baby, she does = we're good, I don't want baby, she doesn't want baby = we're good, I don't want baby, she does = I pay for the next 18 years, I want baby, she doesn't = she kills it hmmm....

Lost User

PhillArx wrote:

Its up to women what they decide about their own bodies and

Then why can't they smoke crack then? Huh? And she is not fucking with her body, she is killing the child by smashing up the child's brain.

█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

Lost User

Mike Gaskey wrote:

now outlawed[^] - no more crushing of skulls.

Now there is a government decision I can agree with.

█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

David Wulff

What's the problem -- it never did you any harm. :~

Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk

Lost User

Mike Gaskey wrote:

no more crushing of skulls

Its nice emotive imagery for the anti-abortion crowd. No matter how barbaric it sounds I think its preferable to the interesting methods used in the back yard abortion business which I have no doubt many people will now turn to.

Lost User

David Wulff wrote:

What's the problem -- it never did you any harm.

So lets just allow women to kill their children since its not harming me or you or anyone else that had mothers that permitted us to live. -- modified at 19:26 Wednesday 18th April, 2007

█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

Josh Gray wrote:

back yard abortion business which I have no doubt many people will now turn to.

bullshit. This decision just outlaws ONE unneeded outrageous baby-killing procedure

Silence is the voice of complicity. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. -- monty python Might I suggest that the universe was always the size of the cosmos. It is just that at one point the cosmos was the size of a marble. -- Colin Angus Mackay

Mike Gaskey

Josh Gray wrote:

No matter how barbaric it

"is", not sounds. now for those that actually didn't read the article and decided to yammer on about "rights", realize this ruling speaks to a single barbaric procedure and is not all encompassing.

Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

Lost User

Me thinks maybe David was hinting that you are the result of a smashed brain.

"I'm a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work the more I have of it." - Thomas Jefferson

Lost User

Mike Mullikin wrote:

Me thinks maybe David was hinting that you are the result of a smashed brain.

If that were true I would probably be in some institution being fed with a tube. It was a lame attempt at an insult thats not even effective at invoking any emotion in me.

█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

Lost User

Mike Gaskey wrote:

"is", not sounds.

In my opinion its no more or less barbaric than any other method. Killing is barbaric by definition.

Mike Gaskey wrote:

now for those that actually didn't read the article and decided to yammer on about "rights", realize this ruling speaks to a single barbaric procedure and is not all encompassing.

I made no mention of rights, my only point is that if people want abortions bad enough they will find a means to achieve it.

Lost User

Captain See Sharp wrote:

If that were true I would probably be in some institution being fed with a tube. It was a lame attempt at an insult thats not even effective at invoking any emotion in me

You just dont understand, its not about you, its about the rest of us amusing ourselves at your expense. The fact that you constantly dont get it just makes it even better :)