Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. .NET (Core and Framework)
  4. .net 2.0 installtion problem

.net 2.0 installtion problem

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved .NET (Core and Framework)
csharphelpquestion
11 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    uowzd01
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I am trying to install .net 2.0 framework on my xp sp2, but the installtion asks for the windows installer 3.0 which is already included in xp sp2, however i downloaded windows installer 3.0 and tried to install it but it failed because sp2 is already there. Did anyone have similar problem like this? Currently I have .net 1.1 and vs2003 in my computer, do i have to uninstall it before install .net 2.0? Thank you in advance.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U uowzd01

      I am trying to install .net 2.0 framework on my xp sp2, but the installtion asks for the windows installer 3.0 which is already included in xp sp2, however i downloaded windows installer 3.0 and tried to install it but it failed because sp2 is already there. Did anyone have similar problem like this? Currently I have .net 1.1 and vs2003 in my computer, do i have to uninstall it before install .net 2.0? Thank you in advance.

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Dave Kreskowiak
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      You might want to try installing Windows Installer 3.1[^]. No, you don't have to uninstall .NET 1.1 first. All versions of the .NET Framework are designed to coexist without any issues.

      Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
           2006, 2007

      U 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Dave Kreskowiak

        You might want to try installing Windows Installer 3.1[^]. No, you don't have to uninstall .NET 1.1 first. All versions of the .NET Framework are designed to coexist without any issues.

        Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
             2006, 2007

        U Offline
        U Offline
        uowzd01
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        thank you for your help, i installed 3.1 but its still the same

        D V 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • U uowzd01

          thank you for your help, i installed 3.1 but its still the same

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dave Kreskowiak
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          You said it failed "because SP2 is already there". What makes you say that? The SP of XP doesn't matter with the installation of the .NET Framework 2.0.

          Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
               2006, 2007

          U 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U uowzd01

            thank you for your help, i installed 3.1 but its still the same

            V Offline
            V Offline
            Vega02
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Make sure that you have all of the necessary updates from Windows Update. This should give you all of the prerequirements that you need to install the framework. If you still can't install it after this, post the exact error message you're receiving. That would be most helpful for us.

            U 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dave Kreskowiak

              You said it failed "because SP2 is already there". What makes you say that? The SP of XP doesn't matter with the installation of the .NET Framework 2.0.

              Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
                   2006, 2007

              U Offline
              U Offline
              uowzd01
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              when i try to install windows installer 3.0 it says "Setup has detected that the service pack version of this system is newer than the update you are applying. there is no need to install this update". But i guess the windows installer 3.0 doesnt know I need it for .net 2.0.

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V Vega02

                Make sure that you have all of the necessary updates from Windows Update. This should give you all of the prerequirements that you need to install the framework. If you still can't install it after this, post the exact error message you're receiving. That would be most helpful for us.

                U Offline
                U Offline
                uowzd01
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                thank you vega, the exact error message is "prerequisite programs are missing, setup has detected that the following prerequisite programs are not installed: Microsoft Windows Installer 3.0". The problem is that windows installer 3.0 wont allow me to install it. What should I do, I have tried with my spare pc which is windows server 2000, it installed perfectly.

                U 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U uowzd01

                  thank you vega, the exact error message is "prerequisite programs are missing, setup has detected that the following prerequisite programs are not installed: Microsoft Windows Installer 3.0". The problem is that windows installer 3.0 wont allow me to install it. What should I do, I have tried with my spare pc which is windows server 2000, it installed perfectly.

                  U Offline
                  U Offline
                  uowzd01
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I uninstalled windows installer 3.1 then .net is able to install. Its so wierd, but i know it must be something wrong with my windows installer, maybe another small bug from microsoft.

                  D V 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • U uowzd01

                    when i try to install windows installer 3.0 it says "Setup has detected that the service pack version of this system is newer than the update you are applying. there is no need to install this update". But i guess the windows installer 3.0 doesnt know I need it for .net 2.0.

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dave Kreskowiak
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    OK. I misunderstood which installation was giving you that message. Hmmm...

                    Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
                         2006, 2007

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U uowzd01

                      I uninstalled windows installer 3.1 then .net is able to install. Its so wierd, but i know it must be something wrong with my windows installer, maybe another small bug from microsoft.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Dave Kreskowiak
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      More like a corrupted installation of 3.0.

                      Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
                           2006, 2007

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U uowzd01

                        I uninstalled windows installer 3.1 then .net is able to install. Its so wierd, but i know it must be something wrong with my windows installer, maybe another small bug from microsoft.

                        V Offline
                        V Offline
                        Vega02
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        That's very strange. But I'm glad you were able to get it to work. :)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups