An American Ranger
-
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
Rangers are pussies. They used to be tough, but quality went way down after the 1970s.
-
Rangers are pussies. They used to be tough, but quality went way down after the 1970s.
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
They used to be tough but, the quality went way down after the 1970s.
Really? What happened in the '70s?
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
Yeah, freedom, self-determination, tolerance, forgiveness, charity, democracy. Democrats believe strongly in those things
source? -- modified at 14:08 Friday 27th April, 2007 modiied to add, charity? the Democrats I know, and I admittedly work to keep that a small group, believe charity emanates from a central government, ie., my tax money.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
Mike Gaskey wrote:
modiied to add, charity? the Democrats I know, and I admittedly work to keep that a small group, believe charity emanates from a central government, ie., my tax money.
Since redistribution of wealth via a centralized authority is compulsory, it's not "charity". It's extortion.
-
Mike Gaskey wrote:
modiied to add, charity? the Democrats I know, and I admittedly work to keep that a small group, believe charity emanates from a central government, ie., my tax money.
Since redistribution of wealth via a centralized authority is compulsory, it's not "charity". It's extortion.
Red Stateler wrote:
It's extortion
yep
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
Bob Flynn wrote:
Once elected, the new president will "suddenly" realize (perhaps with "new" information) that we should continue the effort and that it would be irresponsible to withdrawl troops now.
They realize that now. That's why every proposal to "withdraw troops now" dies a quiet death as soon as its done making noise. We're stuck between a president with not much of a plan, and a congress with no plan at all and no backbone to properly critique the Executive plans.
Bob Flynn wrote:
The problem is that the message that Iraq troops and civilians are standing up for themselves and turning in terrorists is not being made available to the public.
IMHO, that's just the tip of the iceberg. At this point, we could be handed detailed information on every single positive occurrence and still reject it or take it with a grain of salt the size of a Humvee - there has been just entirely too much manipulation of the press to take anything seriously from this administration. It's a bit late in the game to try honesty and still hope anyone believes you. Though of course, better late than never.
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
Shog9 wrote:
They realize that now. That's why every proposal to "withdraw troops now" dies a quiet death as soon as its done making noise.
I agree, but I do not think that their (Democratic party) concern is about the war at all. I think that their efforts are all calculated to improve their chances of winning the next presidential elections.
Shog9 wrote:
there has been just entirely too much manipulation of the press to take anything seriously from this administration
I am not convinced that one side or the other (Dems vs Reps) have manipulated the media more than the other. But I do agree that the common perception is exactly as you described it.
Shog9 wrote:
It's a bit late in the game to try honesty and still hope anyone believes you. Though of course, better late than never.
Thats why I think that this soldier's comments are so good. He is giving first hand accounts of his experiences. More of that is needed from the troops on the ground.
-
Rangers are pussies. They used to be tough, but quality went way down after the 1970s.
-
Your a fucking idiot. If you think Rangers are pussies then you must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
How old are you? :|
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
How old are you? :|
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
David Wulff wrote:
How old are you?
What difference does it make? I'm pretty sure there is very little difference between your age and mine.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Four-five years I think, but that is really not important. I would not use that sort of language at the pub, let alone in a professional forum. The frequency at which you turn to teenage vulgarity is why I asked. "You must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection" -- is that how you'd talk in front of your mother? If I cared squat about you I would be disgusted.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
David Wulff wrote:
How old are you?
What difference does it make? I'm pretty sure there is very little difference between your age and mine.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
I'm pretty sure there is very little difference between your age and mine.
I'm pretty sure i remember how David wrote when he was your age - and as vulgar as he might have been at times, it never approached this sort of tasteless, humorless, worthless spew. Show some respect. If not for the other people on this forum, then for the older and wiser CSS that will someday have to live down the reputation you're building for him.
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
Yeah, freedom, self-determination, tolerance, forgiveness, charity, democracy. Democrats believe strongly in those things...
So do Republicans, Libertarians, Greens & independents. If only the clowns that get elected would actually "live" what they claim to believe. :doh:
"I'm a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work the more I have of it." - Thomas Jefferson
Mike Mullikin wrote:
If only the clowns that get elected would actually "live" what they claim to believe.
It would be a much different world.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
They may be as patriotic as hell to the things they believe in, but those things are diametrically opposite of traditional American principles
Yeah, freedom, self-determination, tolerance, forgiveness, charity, democracy. Democrats believe strongly in those things even though those things are diametrically opposed to traditional American principles. At least those supposed principles espoused by your brand of rightists.
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
Yeah, freedom, self-determination, tolerance, forgiveness, charity, democracy. Democrats believe strongly in those things
As they define them... Freedom - from personal responsibility. self-determination - as defined by a cradle to grave welfare system. Tolerance - of the Marxist ideal. Forgiveness - without accoutability (except for Republicans) Charity - to those according upon their needs from those according to their ability and enforced by the law. democracy - unless vetoed by the courts.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
-
Four-five years I think, but that is really not important. I would not use that sort of language at the pub, let alone in a professional forum. The frequency at which you turn to teenage vulgarity is why I asked. "You must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection" -- is that how you'd talk in front of your mother? If I cared squat about you I would be disgusted.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milkDavid Wulff wrote:
Four-five years I think, but that is really not important.
I'm pretty sure you are 23, I am 20.
David Wulff wrote:
I would not use that sort of language at the pub, let alone in a professional forum.
And calling Rangers pussies is okay with you? Why haven't you voiced your displeasure with him? I was simply making a comparison between the average ranger and him. If he thinks rangers are pussies then he must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection. Its simple to understand, it even has the extra kick to make it very offensive which is desirable in a post like that. The soapbox is not really a professional forum. It may be located on a programming/IT/technical website, but its NOT used to rant about tech issues.
David Wulff wrote:
The frequency at which you turn to teenage vulgarity is why I asked.
The frequency is minimal in real life or any other forum, not that thats relevant to anyone here. There is a massive number of middle aged folk who have plenty of fucks and shit and pussies to shout out, just because one is older, that doesn't mean the person holds back thoughts or pulls punches. Maturity is not being civil at all times no matter what the circumstance.
David Wulff wrote:
is that how you'd talk in front of your mother?
Of course not, not that she would care anyways. I try to maintain a steady mood and easy going attitude at all times. Even when discussing politics with people face to face I don't get into it. For instance I was talking to a black girl at work about why she doesn't like Bush and loves Bill Clinton. She said she didn't know why she didn't like Bush but she liked Clinton because he was black. Normally in the soapbox I would rant on with insults and profanity, however in this case I laughed knowing he wasn't black or even acted black for that matter and then said to her, "you should judge a president on how he runs the country not by his character". What gets me here is that there is a lot of hypocrisy among the CPians in the soapbox, drive by voting and such. Then there are people who get offended over patterns of black on white pixels on their computer screens and have a fit over it. It shows how weak people are. -- modified at 15:56 Friday 27th April, 2007
█▒ρ
-
Captain See Sharp wrote:
I'm pretty sure there is very little difference between your age and mine.
I'm pretty sure i remember how David wrote when he was your age - and as vulgar as he might have been at times, it never approached this sort of tasteless, humorless, worthless spew. Show some respect. If not for the other people on this forum, then for the older and wiser CSS that will someday have to live down the reputation you're building for him.
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
Shog9 wrote:
I'm pretty sure i remember how David wrote when he was your age - and as vulgar as he might have been at times, it never approached this sort of tasteless, humorless, worthless spew.
This is exactly the point of the original message. It seems I have discovered something offensive that I can now use to my advantage.
Shog9 wrote:
Show some respect. If not for the other people on this forum, then for the older and wiser CSS that will someday have to live down the reputation you're building for him.
This is the soapbox and if you have noticed, which I'm pretty sure you have, there is a notice at the top that says enter at your own risk. The original post was for Ed, he has no respect for the rangers. Calling them pussies, if he thinks they are pussies then what is he? I'm sure he ain't no uber tough bad ass. Keeping with the analogy, he called them pussies, so he must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection. Now are you going to talk to Ed about his fowl language and lack of respect to not only the people on this forum but the Rangers also? I doubt you will or anyone else for that matter. The older wiser CSS will not worry about what people on a internet forum think about him nor do I now. I don't come here to try to make a good impression so someone might consider contacting me for work. I doubt that would ever happen anyways since my articles are so simple and I hardly ever answer programming questions on the forums. Right now programming is just a hobby, I really enjoy it and thats why I do it. If I want to make money programming I will figure out a way, software is an extremely diverse market and I can come up with a product and make it usable on the first version.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
Shog9 wrote:
I'm pretty sure i remember how David wrote when he was your age - and as vulgar as he might have been at times, it never approached this sort of tasteless, humorless, worthless spew.
This is exactly the point of the original message. It seems I have discovered something offensive that I can now use to my advantage.
Shog9 wrote:
Show some respect. If not for the other people on this forum, then for the older and wiser CSS that will someday have to live down the reputation you're building for him.
This is the soapbox and if you have noticed, which I'm pretty sure you have, there is a notice at the top that says enter at your own risk. The original post was for Ed, he has no respect for the rangers. Calling them pussies, if he thinks they are pussies then what is he? I'm sure he ain't no uber tough bad ass. Keeping with the analogy, he called them pussies, so he must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection. Now are you going to talk to Ed about his fowl language and lack of respect to not only the people on this forum but the Rangers also? I doubt you will or anyone else for that matter. The older wiser CSS will not worry about what people on a internet forum think about him nor do I now. I don't come here to try to make a good impression so someone might consider contacting me for work. I doubt that would ever happen anyways since my articles are so simple and I hardly ever answer programming questions on the forums. Right now programming is just a hobby, I really enjoy it and thats why I do it. If I want to make money programming I will figure out a way, software is an extremely diverse market and I can come up with a product and make it usable on the first version.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
It seems I have discovered something offensive that I can now use to my advantage.
What, you thought you were running out of ways to look childish? Don't worry - you can always fall back onto one of those all-caps cuss-fests you're so fond of. :rolleyes:
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The original post was for Ed, he has no respect for the rangers.
So, you're a Ranger? Or you just think they're so precious that they need to be defended on obscure message boards...?
Captain See Sharp wrote:
I doubt you will or anyone else for that matter.
I replied before you did. Or did you just miss that, what with the lack of blatant vulgarity in my post...
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The older wiser CSS will not worry about what people on a internet forum think about him nor do I now.
Yeah, i think that's pretty obvious. But you might want to remember that the next time someone's giving you a hard time... It really doesn't matter what you say you're like "in real life" - here, you are only what your words portray you as, and you'd better be prepared for whatever that amounts to...
Captain See Sharp wrote:
I don't come here to try to make a good impression so someone might consider contacting me for work.
I'd be pretty scared of anyone looking for new hires in The Soapbox... :^)
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
David Wulff wrote:
How old are you?
What difference does it make? I'm pretty sure there is very little difference between your age and mine.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
At least he acts his age. Grow up dude. Hey wait, I'm gonna use a language even you can understand: Grow up you aids infected cum bubble!
-- Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
-
Captain See Sharp wrote:
It seems I have discovered something offensive that I can now use to my advantage.
What, you thought you were running out of ways to look childish? Don't worry - you can always fall back onto one of those all-caps cuss-fests you're so fond of. :rolleyes:
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The original post was for Ed, he has no respect for the rangers.
So, you're a Ranger? Or you just think they're so precious that they need to be defended on obscure message boards...?
Captain See Sharp wrote:
I doubt you will or anyone else for that matter.
I replied before you did. Or did you just miss that, what with the lack of blatant vulgarity in my post...
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The older wiser CSS will not worry about what people on a internet forum think about him nor do I now.
Yeah, i think that's pretty obvious. But you might want to remember that the next time someone's giving you a hard time... It really doesn't matter what you say you're like "in real life" - here, you are only what your words portray you as, and you'd better be prepared for whatever that amounts to...
Captain See Sharp wrote:
I don't come here to try to make a good impression so someone might consider contacting me for work.
I'd be pretty scared of anyone looking for new hires in The Soapbox... :^)
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
Shog9 wrote:
I replied before you did. Or did you just miss that, what with the lack of blatant vulgarity in my post...
You did not express your displeasure with his language. Thats the point I was making.
Shog9 wrote:
So, you're a Ranger? Or you just think they're so precious that they need to be defended on obscure message boards...?
Are the people posting in the soapbox so precious that they need to be defended on obscure message boards? It seems to me you are being very selective, hypocrite.
Shog9 wrote:
Yeah, i think that's pretty obvious. But you might want to remember that the next time someone's giving you a hard time... It really doesn't matter what you say you're like "in real life" - here, you are only what your words portray you as, and you'd better be prepared for whatever that amounts to...
...and I will continue with the way I want to express my self.
Shog9 wrote:
I'd be pretty scared of anyone looking for new hires in The Soapbox...
I'm sure anyone looking for a programmer at the codeproject surely reviews all the person's posts like you didn't think about that. :rolleyes:
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
At least he acts his age. Grow up dude. Hey wait, I'm gonna use a language even you can understand: Grow up you aids infected cum bubble!
-- Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
At least he acts his age. Grow up dude. Hey wait, I'm gonna use a language even you can understand: Grow up you aids infected cum bubble!
Really...? You seem to have a hard time understanding what you just said to me.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
Shog9 wrote:
I replied before you did. Or did you just miss that, what with the lack of blatant vulgarity in my post...
You did not express your displeasure with his language. Thats the point I was making.
Shog9 wrote:
So, you're a Ranger? Or you just think they're so precious that they need to be defended on obscure message boards...?
Are the people posting in the soapbox so precious that they need to be defended on obscure message boards? It seems to me you are being very selective, hypocrite.
Shog9 wrote:
Yeah, i think that's pretty obvious. But you might want to remember that the next time someone's giving you a hard time... It really doesn't matter what you say you're like "in real life" - here, you are only what your words portray you as, and you'd better be prepared for whatever that amounts to...
...and I will continue with the way I want to express my self.
Shog9 wrote:
I'd be pretty scared of anyone looking for new hires in The Soapbox...
I'm sure anyone looking for a programmer at the codeproject surely reviews all the person's posts like you didn't think about that. :rolleyes:
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
You did not express your displeasure with his language.
Of course not. I expressed my opinion. And still managed to do it without being excessively vulgar. I could express your opinion without being vulgar as well, but then what would you learn?
Captain See Sharp wrote:
Are the people posting in the soapbox so precious that they need to be defended on obscure message boards?
Well... you are being pretty defensive here... so i guess the answer is, "some of them" ;)
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
Captain See Sharp wrote:
You did not express your displeasure with his language.
Of course not. I expressed my opinion. And still managed to do it without being excessively vulgar. I could express your opinion without being vulgar as well, but then what would you learn?
Captain See Sharp wrote:
Are the people posting in the soapbox so precious that they need to be defended on obscure message boards?
Well... you are being pretty defensive here... so i guess the answer is, "some of them" ;)
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
Shog9 wrote:
Of course not. I expressed my opinion.
Shog9 wrote:
Well... you are being pretty defensive here... so i guess the answer is, "some of them"
Not about his language. Actually you did not express an opinion at all, you asked a question. What is so hard to understand? You got your self into this situation now face the music. You are a hypocrite who discriminates.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██