MC++?
-
MC++ allows legacy C++ code to be called from .NET applications and for this it is very good. The feeling of calling managed C++ code from a C# application is a wonderous one. The book Visual C++.NET Step by Step is a very good book and it will help you realise why we have MC++ and the power the it holds. I highly recommend it. Michael :-)
Michael P Butler wrote: The book Visual C++.NET Step by Step is a very good book and it will help you realise why we have MC++ and the power the it holds. I highly recommend it. From what I've heard people say about that book, it's more of an MFC book I'd say with a few chapters dedicated to MC++ Nish
Regards, Nish Native CPian. Born and brought up on CP. With the CP blood in him.
-
Michael P Butler wrote: The book Visual C++.NET Step by Step is a very good book and it will help you realise why we have MC++ and the power the it holds. I highly recommend it. From what I've heard people say about that book, it's more of an MFC book I'd say with a few chapters dedicated to MC++ Nish
Regards, Nish Native CPian. Born and brought up on CP. With the CP blood in him.
-
James T. Johnson wrote: Visual C++.NET Step by Step is an MC++ book. Oh! Sorry :-O
Regards, Nish Native CPian. Born and brought up on CP. With the CP blood in him.
-
Michael P Butler wrote: The book Visual C++.NET Step by Step is a very good book and it will help you realise why we have MC++ and the power the it holds. I highly recommend it. From what I've heard people say about that book, it's more of an MFC book I'd say with a few chapters dedicated to MC++ Nish
Regards, Nish Native CPian. Born and brought up on CP. With the CP blood in him.
Nish - Native CPian wrote: it's more of an MFC book I'd say with a few chapters dedicated to MC++ Nah, its pure .NET. I can't see any MFC code in the book at all. It does a bit of ATL but only the new Server stuff. A very good book for a C++ programmer wanting to know how they can use their knowledge under .NET Michael :-)
-
Nish - Native CPian wrote: it's more of an MFC book I'd say with a few chapters dedicated to MC++ Nah, its pure .NET. I can't see any MFC code in the book at all. It does a bit of ATL but only the new Server stuff. A very good book for a C++ programmer wanting to know how they can use their knowledge under .NET Michael :-)
Michael P Butler wrote: Nah, its pure .NET. I can't see any MFC code in the book at all. It does a bit of ATL but only the new Server stuff. A very good book for a C++ programmer wanting to know how they can use their knowledge under .NET I know, I know. James told me :-) Nish
Regards, Nish Native CPian. Born and brought up on CP. With the CP blood in him.
-
Michael P Butler wrote: Nah, its pure .NET. I can't see any MFC code in the book at all. It does a bit of ATL but only the new Server stuff. A very good book for a C++ programmer wanting to know how they can use their knowledge under .NET I know, I know. James told me :-) Nish
Regards, Nish Native CPian. Born and brought up on CP. With the CP blood in him.
Is MC++ worth learning if I've already started learning C# and do not have any Unmanged code that I need to keep?:confused: I also need some ideas of C++ API's or other programming languages(non .NET) that I could learn. The reason im asking this is becuase I think I need a break from .NET and MFC for a little while.
-
Is MC++ worth learning if I've already started learning C# and do not have any Unmanged code that I need to keep?:confused: I also need some ideas of C++ API's or other programming languages(non .NET) that I could learn. The reason im asking this is becuase I think I need a break from .NET and MFC for a little while.
brian1415 wrote: Is MC++ worth learning if I've already started learning C# and do not have any Unmanged code that I need to keep? Nope! MC++ is nearly unsupported by VS.NET. A lot of things just dont work for MC++ the same way it does for C#. So unless you wanna hand code everything stick to C#. Specially since you don't wanna do any unmanaged stuff! brian1415 wrote: also need some ideas of C++ API's or other programming languages(non .NET) that I could learn. The reason im asking this is becuase I think I need a break from .NET and MFC for a little while. Maybe, ATL? Nish
Regards, Nish Native CPian. Born and brought up on CP. With the CP blood in him.
-
brian1415 wrote: Is MC++ worth learning if I've already started learning C# and do not have any Unmanged code that I need to keep? Nope! MC++ is nearly unsupported by VS.NET. A lot of things just dont work for MC++ the same way it does for C#. So unless you wanna hand code everything stick to C#. Specially since you don't wanna do any unmanaged stuff! brian1415 wrote: also need some ideas of C++ API's or other programming languages(non .NET) that I could learn. The reason im asking this is becuase I think I need a break from .NET and MFC for a little while. Maybe, ATL? Nish
Regards, Nish Native CPian. Born and brought up on CP. With the CP blood in him.
Thanks nish, I know this is the wrong forum for this question but I thought I might as well continue with this thread. What exactly is ATL I know it deals with servers or somthing...:confused:
-
Thanks nish, I know this is the wrong forum for this question but I thought I might as well continue with this thread. What exactly is ATL I know it deals with servers or somthing...:confused:
brian1415 wrote: What exactly is ATL I know it deals with servers or somthing C++ Template based class library that makes COM development easier Nish
Regards, Nish Native CPian. Born and brought up on CP. With the CP blood in him.
-
Let's not forget the garbage collection. You can stop using "delete" and creating destructors. No more memory leaks or those horrible crashes in memory freed twice! Al:omg: :omg:
Albert Pascual wrote: Let's not forget the garbage collection. I believe that a good programmer has to be able to manage his/her own memory. I am wondering how much overhead the garbace collection produce? :) Best regards, Alexandru Savescu
-
Albert Pascual wrote: Let's not forget the garbage collection. I believe that a good programmer has to be able to manage his/her own memory. I am wondering how much overhead the garbace collection produce? :) Best regards, Alexandru Savescu