What do you think about 1.0 votation without replies?

Shog9 0

Meh. For new users, perhaps it's worth explaining why their posts are seen as inane / trolling / rude. Once. After that, vote 'em down as a heads-up to other readers - the author is too dense to benefit from feedback.

----

...the wind blows over it and it is gone, and its place remembers it no more...

CPallini

Partially I agree with you. I think that the most of them have a dogmatic and a rather incompetent approach (the competent ones, usually answers). :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

CPallini

Well, I have to admit the scope of my previous post wasn't so clear... There are, of course, many inane / trolling / rude posts on CP and, I agree, those must be disapproved. On the other hand, I was complaining about voting down technical answers without replying to (if the answer is wrong, incorrect, hazardous, ... then voting 1.0 is fine but you should also motivate the vote, to make the author know his mistake; another scenario comes int play when if you vote 1.0 only on your personal opinion basis: IMHO this is wrong by itself and anyway, you have, at least, to make the author what your opinion is. :-D

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

dighn

You get a 1 for whining. Satisfied? :)

CPallini

Oh yes :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

CPallini

I agree.:)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

Lost User

I agree with you. The voting system is used to rate the author, not the post. That is why some platnuim member can get voted like 2 fives just for posting "me too" or something.

The divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for absurdity. - John Adams

KaRl

Nothing.

When they kick at your front door How you gonna come? With your hands on your head Or on the trigger of your gun?

Fold with us! ¤ flickr

CPallini

You've a lot of ideas :-D

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

peterchen

If he's trolling, I just vote 1.0 to get the message below deletion threshold.

We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighist

Colin Angus Mackay

CPallini wrote:

What do you think about 1.0 votations without replies?

I think that "vote" is both a verb and a noun. There is no need to add a "(a)tion" ending to something that is already a noun.

Upcoming events: * Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ... * Reading: Developer Day 5 Never write for other people. Write for yourself, because you have a passion for it. -- Marc Clifton My website

Nish Nishant

Colin Angus Mackay wrote:

I think that "vote" is both a verb and a noun. There is no need to add a "(a)tion" ending to something that is already a noun.

I think so too. I am surprised at how people expect 1 votes to be justified by a comment, but don't mind people voting 5s (whether on articles or on posts).

Regards, Nish

Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

CPallini

Colin Angus Mackay wrote:

I think that "vote" is both a verb and a noun. There is no need to add a "(a)tion" ending to something that is already a noun.

OK grammar teacher: I have to admit my English is bad (Maybe being Scottish you've a little advantage on me). Anyway this definitely is NOT the point of my posting. :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

CPallini

OK, another grammar teacher... Sorry for my bad English.

Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

I think so too. I am surprised at how people expect 1 votes to be justified by a comment, but don't mind people voting 5s (whether on articles or on posts).

I'm surprised at your surprise :confused: (you're a clever guy :-D). If people votes 5 your message or article there is a high probability that you already know why. On the other hand if someone votes 1 then, perhaps, you've made a mistake or missed something and hence, you may appreciate the explaining comment. I think it is not a difficult concept. :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

CPallini

peterchen wrote:

If he's trolling, I just vote 1.0 to get the message below deletion threshold.

I agree on the above. But see also here [^]. :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

Sylvester george

I agree..:)I am ready to give 5:)

Regards, Sylvester G sylvester_g_m@yahoo.com