Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. .NET (Core and Framework)
  4. .Net 3.0 installation always fail

.Net 3.0 installation always fail

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved .NET (Core and Framework)
csharpvisual-studiocomhelpquestion
11 Posts 3 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    George_George
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello everyone, I am using installer from, http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=C2B1E300-F358-4523-B479-F53D234CDCCF&displaylang=en#AdditionalInfo on Windows XP SP2 machine. The installer always report an error (and pops up the popular message box of sending an error message to Microsoft). I have tried on two machines and the error is the same. But I do not know where to check the exact error log. My questions are, 1. This package is for Windows XP SP2 or only Windows Vista? 2. Is it mandatory needed if I want to use Visual Studio 2005 + .Net 3.0 to do C# development? 3. Anyone has met with similar issues before? thanks in advance, George

    A K 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • G George_George

      Hello everyone, I am using installer from, http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=C2B1E300-F358-4523-B479-F53D234CDCCF&displaylang=en#AdditionalInfo on Windows XP SP2 machine. The installer always report an error (and pops up the popular message box of sending an error message to Microsoft). I have tried on two machines and the error is the same. But I do not know where to check the exact error log. My questions are, 1. This package is for Windows XP SP2 or only Windows Vista? 2. Is it mandatory needed if I want to use Visual Studio 2005 + .Net 3.0 to do C# development? 3. Anyone has met with similar issues before? thanks in advance, George

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Akhilesh Yadav
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      1. This package is for Windows XP SP2 or only Windows Vista? >> I think there is another SP avialble for using .net 3.0 2. Is it mandatory needed if I want to use Visual Studio 2005 + .Net 3.0 to do C# development? >> No Not at All

      --Akki

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G George_George

        Hello everyone, I am using installer from, http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=C2B1E300-F358-4523-B479-F53D234CDCCF&displaylang=en#AdditionalInfo on Windows XP SP2 machine. The installer always report an error (and pops up the popular message box of sending an error message to Microsoft). I have tried on two machines and the error is the same. But I do not know where to check the exact error log. My questions are, 1. This package is for Windows XP SP2 or only Windows Vista? 2. Is it mandatory needed if I want to use Visual Studio 2005 + .Net 3.0 to do C# development? 3. Anyone has met with similar issues before? thanks in advance, George

        K Offline
        K Offline
        Kevin McFarlane
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        First, I assume you already have .NET 2.0 installed? If not, you'll need that. I also installed this Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Redistributable Package[^] Then I installed the .NET 3.0 SDK some time later. You don't necessarily need it. I was doing mostly Workflow Foundation which only required the .NET 3.0 Redistributable + the Workflow Extensions designer. It was only when I did an experiement with WCF that I needed a utility that was in the .NET 3 SDK.

        George_George wrote:

        Is it mandatory needed if I want to use Visual Studio 2005 + .Net 3.0 to do C# development?

        It depends which bits you want to use. For WF you just need the .NET 3 redist + WF Desiner.

        Kevin

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kevin McFarlane

          First, I assume you already have .NET 2.0 installed? If not, you'll need that. I also installed this Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Redistributable Package[^] Then I installed the .NET 3.0 SDK some time later. You don't necessarily need it. I was doing mostly Workflow Foundation which only required the .NET 3.0 Redistributable + the Workflow Extensions designer. It was only when I did an experiement with WCF that I needed a utility that was in the .NET 3 SDK.

          George_George wrote:

          Is it mandatory needed if I want to use Visual Studio 2005 + .Net 3.0 to do C# development?

          It depends which bits you want to use. For WF you just need the .NET 3 redist + WF Desiner.

          Kevin

          G Offline
          G Offline
          George_George
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Thanks Kevin, Yes, I installed .Net 2.0 both SDK and Runtime with Visual Studio 2005. I am using common (old) functions between .Net 2.0 and .Net 3.0 using C#, so I think there is no need to install the SDK from? Right? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=C2B1E300-F358-4523-B479-F53D234CDCCF&displaylang=en#AdditionalInfo[^] So, I just build my application using previous (.Net 2.0 environment) and test it with .Net 3.0 Runtime? regards, George

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Akhilesh Yadav

            1. This package is for Windows XP SP2 or only Windows Vista? >> I think there is another SP avialble for using .net 3.0 2. Is it mandatory needed if I want to use Visual Studio 2005 + .Net 3.0 to do C# development? >> No Not at All

            --Akki

            G Offline
            G Offline
            George_George
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Thanks Akki, >> I think there is another SP avialble for using .net 3.0 Can you provide an URL please? I think you mean there is a .NET SDK 3.0 for Windows XP + Visual Studio 2005? >> No Not at All My application is not using the new functions in .Net 3.0 (e.g. workflow) and only utilize the common functions. In this situation, my purpose is to test whether my application works with .Net 3.0 Runtime. Do you think in my situation, I need to build my application again using .Net SDK 3.0? Or just using the old build (built by .Net 2.0) and run it in .Net 3.0 Runtime environment? (I still doubt whether there are any differences in my application build, if I choose to use 2.0 SDK or use 3.0 SDK?) regards, George

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G George_George

              Thanks Kevin, Yes, I installed .Net 2.0 both SDK and Runtime with Visual Studio 2005. I am using common (old) functions between .Net 2.0 and .Net 3.0 using C#, so I think there is no need to install the SDK from? Right? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=C2B1E300-F358-4523-B479-F53D234CDCCF&displaylang=en#AdditionalInfo[^] So, I just build my application using previous (.Net 2.0 environment) and test it with .Net 3.0 Runtime? regards, George

              K Offline
              K Offline
              Kevin McFarlane
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Unfortunately, Microsoft have created confusion with their naming. There is no .NET 3 runtime as such. Everything uses the .NET 2 runtime. .NET 3 refers to .NET Framework 3 which is essentially just a bunch of new classes for WF, WCF, SPF and WCS. So you don't need to install .NET 3 at all if you're not going to be using any of WF, WCF etc.

              Kevin

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Kevin McFarlane

                Unfortunately, Microsoft have created confusion with their naming. There is no .NET 3 runtime as such. Everything uses the .NET 2 runtime. .NET 3 refers to .NET Framework 3 which is essentially just a bunch of new classes for WF, WCF, SPF and WCS. So you don't need to install .NET 3 at all if you're not going to be using any of WF, WCF etc.

                Kevin

                G Offline
                G Offline
                George_George
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Thanks Kevin, I want to setup Runtime environment to make some tests. For a machine which is empty (.Net 2.0 is not installed), I think I should install the following Runtime SDK to enable .Net 3.0, right? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=10CC340B-F857-4A14-83F5-25634C3BF043&displaylang=en[^] Any need to install .Net 2.0 Runtime before install the Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Redistributable Package? regards, George

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G George_George

                  Thanks Kevin, I want to setup Runtime environment to make some tests. For a machine which is empty (.Net 2.0 is not installed), I think I should install the following Runtime SDK to enable .Net 3.0, right? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=10CC340B-F857-4A14-83F5-25634C3BF043&displaylang=en[^] Any need to install .Net 2.0 Runtime before install the Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Redistributable Package? regards, George

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  Kevin McFarlane
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  George_George wrote:

                  Any need to install .Net 2.0 Runtime before install the Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Redistributable Package?

                  Yes.

                  Kevin

                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Kevin McFarlane

                    George_George wrote:

                    Any need to install .Net 2.0 Runtime before install the Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Redistributable Package?

                    Yes.

                    Kevin

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    George_George
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Thanks Kevin, I have tested that Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Redistributable Package will install .Net 2.0 Runtime (like System.Data.dll) automatically, no need to install .Net 2.0 Runtime in advance. regards, George

                    K 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G George_George

                      Thanks Kevin, I have tested that Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Redistributable Package will install .Net 2.0 Runtime (like System.Data.dll) automatically, no need to install .Net 2.0 Runtime in advance. regards, George

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      Kevin McFarlane
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Ah, I didn't know that. :)

                      Kevin

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K Kevin McFarlane

                        Ah, I didn't know that. :)

                        Kevin

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        George_George
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Anyway, thanks buddy! You helped me all the way. :-) regards, George

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups