Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. One of My Interview Questions Today

One of My Interview Questions Today

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
career
47 Posts 32 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Dan Neely

    recursive, how WTFworthy. :rolleyes:

    -- You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer

    J Offline
    J Offline
    jrbirdman
    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    Well, duh. Everyone knows that you don't type code anymore! It's keyboarded. Stupid VB programmers. :) Someone who likes it both ways, uh huh!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • realJSOPR realJSOP

      Actually, it's not so much a "can-you-do-it" question as much as it is a "how-would-you-approach-it" question.

      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
      -----
      "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Michael J Collins
      wrote on last edited by
      #37

      I had to look up null terminated. I suck.. :( Seriously, I've been programming for 8 years (not including the 10,20 basic way back in the day), yet every time I see something like this I wonder what the hell I've really learned in all that time. It's discouraging.

      Michael J. Collins Web Application Programmer

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • realJSOPR realJSOP

        Actually, it's not so much a "can-you-do-it" question as much as it is a "how-would-you-approach-it" question.

        "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
        -----
        "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Paul Conrad
        wrote on last edited by
        #38

        John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

        it is a "how-would-you-approach-it" question

        That would make more sense.  To see what kind of thinker one is.

        "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Michael J Collins

          I had to look up null terminated. I suck.. :( Seriously, I've been programming for 8 years (not including the 10,20 basic way back in the day), yet every time I see something like this I wonder what the hell I've really learned in all that time. It's discouraging.

          Michael J. Collins Web Application Programmer

          J Offline
          J Offline
          jim_taylor
          wrote on last edited by
          #39

          Michael, Back in ancient times (ca.1966) my friend Richard Pratt and I had a little contest, coding a binary search in IBM 360 assembler. At the end we were fighting to remove individual cycles from the loop. When we agreed he had won, reaching the irreducible minimum loop time, Dick Giering showed up with a faster method in hand. His algorithm wasted "lots" of time at the start building a halving table. Once he had the table built, his search ran almost twice as fast as our best effort, because he didn't have a divide instruction inside the loop. Don't feel bad. As the saying goes, "Ve get too soon oldt, und too late schmart." JimT

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • realJSOPR realJSOP

            Memory must have been an issue. Otherwise, the requirement would not have been stated the way it was. I could have knocked two more cycles off the cpu load, but it would have cost them 4 more bytes of memory.

            "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
            -----
            "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

            R Offline
            R Offline
            rnot
            wrote on last edited by
            #40

            An interesting variation I was faced with in an interview last year was this: Reverse the order of the words in a string in place. You get one character of memory and can assign pointers.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • realJSOPR realJSOP

              Write a function that reverses the contents of a null-terminated string in place. The only limitation is that you can't allocate a new string during any part of the process. This is what I gave them:

              void ReverseString(char* str)
              {
              int len = strlen(str);
              int delta = len / 2;
              char pivot;
              for (int i = 0; i < delta; i++)
              {
              pivot = str[i];
              str[i] = str[len - i - 1];
              str[len - i - 1] = pivot;
              }
              }

              I know, it's not all that impressive, but the interviewer told me I'm the only person he's seen do it that way (which seemed odd to me). BTW, I feel that both of the interviews I did today went well. I fully expect to get offers on from each company.

              "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
              -----
              "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

              C Offline
              C Offline
              clydecraig
              wrote on last edited by
              #41

              I don't have a c++ compiler on hand to prove it, but I think this code does the trick for single-byte character sets: void ReverseString(char* str) { char* end = strrchr(str, 0); while(str < --end) { str ^= end; end ^= str; str++ ^= end--; } }

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Paul Conrad

                John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                Memory must have been an issue. Otherwise, the requirement would not have been stated the way it was.

                Maybe they just wanted to have you think about a solution from a different perspective?  Not sure why they would have a seasoned programmer like yourself write code example to prove yourself.

                "I've seen more information on a frickin' sticky note!" - Dave Kreskowiak

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Peter Mulholland
                wrote on last edited by
                #42

                Joel on Software suggested reversing a string as an interview question as an article some time ago. I got the same question in an interview almost 12 months ago and I think more developers are using it in interviews based on the Joel on Software article. He also gave some explanation of the conclusions you can draw from the solution given by the interviewee. http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000073.html -- modified at 5:39 Wednesday 25th July, 2007

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • realJSOPR realJSOP

                  Write a function that reverses the contents of a null-terminated string in place. The only limitation is that you can't allocate a new string during any part of the process. This is what I gave them:

                  void ReverseString(char* str)
                  {
                  int len = strlen(str);
                  int delta = len / 2;
                  char pivot;
                  for (int i = 0; i < delta; i++)
                  {
                  pivot = str[i];
                  str[i] = str[len - i - 1];
                  str[len - i - 1] = pivot;
                  }
                  }

                  I know, it's not all that impressive, but the interviewer told me I'm the only person he's seen do it that way (which seemed odd to me). BTW, I feel that both of the interviews I did today went well. I fully expect to get offers on from each company.

                  "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                  -----
                  "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  prashant_jalasutrram
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #43

                  Hi, Very Good question and i having 3 1/2 years experience also could not get a clue.Really felt guilty. Thanks for sharing this Q&A. Thanks Prashant

                  prashant_vijaywada

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C clydecraig

                    I don't have a c++ compiler on hand to prove it, but I think this code does the trick for single-byte character sets: void ReverseString(char* str) { char* end = strrchr(str, 0); while(str < --end) { str ^= end; end ^= str; str++ ^= end--; } }

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    clydecraig
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #44

                    (amended from previous post) I don't have a c++ compiler on hand to prove it, but I think this code does the trick for single-byte character sets: void ReverseString(char* str) { char* end = strrchr(str, 0); while(str < --end) { *str ^= *end; *end ^= *str; *str++ ^= *end--; } }

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C clydecraig

                      (amended from previous post) I don't have a c++ compiler on hand to prove it, but I think this code does the trick for single-byte character sets: void ReverseString(char* str) { char* end = strrchr(str, 0); while(str < --end) { *str ^= *end; *end ^= *str; *str++ ^= *end--; } }

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      clydecraig
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #45

                      (amended from previous post -- again) I don't have a c++ compiler on hand to prove it, but I think this code does the trick for single-byte character sets: void ReverseString(char* str) { char* end = strrchr(str, 0); while(str < --end) { *str ^= *end; *end ^= *str; *str++ ^= *end; } }

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • realJSOPR realJSOP

                        Write a function that reverses the contents of a null-terminated string in place. The only limitation is that you can't allocate a new string during any part of the process. This is what I gave them:

                        void ReverseString(char* str)
                        {
                        int len = strlen(str);
                        int delta = len / 2;
                        char pivot;
                        for (int i = 0; i < delta; i++)
                        {
                        pivot = str[i];
                        str[i] = str[len - i - 1];
                        str[len - i - 1] = pivot;
                        }
                        }

                        I know, it's not all that impressive, but the interviewer told me I'm the only person he's seen do it that way (which seemed odd to me). BTW, I feel that both of the interviews I did today went well. I fully expect to get offers on from each company.

                        "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                        -----
                        "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                        U Offline
                        U Offline
                        User of Users Group
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #46

                        function = std::reverse( sz, sz + strlen(sz)); Regards, Not Joel or pointer arithmetic interviewer

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P Peter Mulholland

                          Joel on Software suggested reversing a string as an interview question as an article some time ago. I got the same question in an interview almost 12 months ago and I think more developers are using it in interviews based on the Joel on Software article. He also gave some explanation of the conclusions you can draw from the solution given by the interviewee. http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000073.html -- modified at 5:39 Wednesday 25th July, 2007

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          Paul Conrad
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #47

                          Like John had said, it was more about how to think out the problem rather than can you do it or not.

                          "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups