Pope Admits to Evolution
-
Linkety[^] My thoughts are all there.
Brad Australian - My Blog Thinking - My Personal [Ad Free] Blog
"There is no theory of evolution, just a list of creatures Chuck Norris allows to live." ;P
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
-
The point is who is the pope? Best regards, Paul.
Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.
The pope does not represent all christians, only catholics.
Johan Lombaard Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
-
Linkety[^] My thoughts are all there.
Brad Australian - My Blog Thinking - My Personal [Ad Free] Blog
Jimmy Ropes is going to be really upset with you.
-
Jimmy Ropes is going to be really upset with you.
-
Bradml wrote:
Don't follow any man spiritually, don't do anything that will get you in sh*t if god is real
Now that is an awesome statement.
Don't follow any man spiritually, don't do anything that will get you in sh*t if god is real - Bradml[^]
-
Bradml wrote:
Now if you really want to we can take this discussion up at another location.
Yeah, I will be grad for the opportunity. Which way? Best regards, Paul.
Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.
Sorry for not replying sooner, Almighty Bob decided i was not to be notificated about this post. Just drop me an email and I will happily chat with you. I am going to get some sleep now but tomorrow I'll have some time for it.
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
-
Jimmy Ropes is going to be really upset with you.
Troll
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
For reporting a story?
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
Bradml wrote:
For reporting a story?
No, for the topic, but I see others have already expressed sentiments similar to mine that this is material suitable for the soapbox.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
Sorry for not replying sooner, Almighty Bob decided i was not to be notificated about this post. Just drop me an email and I will happily chat with you. I am going to get some sleep now but tomorrow I'll have some time for it.
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
Same here, just got up and starting another day. I will try the email during the weekend. Best regards, Paul.
Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.
-
Linkety[^] My thoughts are all there.
Brad Australian - My Blog Thinking - My Personal [Ad Free] Blog
You know, this is definitely soap-box stuff, but I just have to weigh in here... a few years ago, one of my sons came as close to possible as losing an eye. I'm over it, he's over it, but it was a freak accident that forever altered his future. The hardest part for me was to see a 15 year old come to grips with something like this - it's probably harder than the injury itself. Anyway, in the process of learning all about the human eye, and it's incredible DESIGN, I have come to the conclusion that evolution is not a reasonable scientific theory. Period. The above statement is dogmatic, and I freely admit to it being so. And I will state that I am a Christian believer, but don't let that deter you. I am also an engineer in training, and there is no way I could ever conclude that the human eye could EVER evolve. It is simply too perfect. We look at a high end, state of the art motherboard, multiple layers, cooling systems, and we know that someone verybright and creative has designed this miracle of technology. Then we look at life and conclude it's random? Semi random? It isn't reasonable. just a different perspective. Now returning to randomly beating on my keyboard, hoping a functional piece of s/w emerges....
Charlie Gilley Will program for food... Whoever said children were cheaper by the dozen... lied. Overheard in a cubicle: "A project is just a bug under development." Seeking to rise above the intelligence of a one eared rabbit... Caught in a vortex of weirdness...
-
You know, this is definitely soap-box stuff, but I just have to weigh in here... a few years ago, one of my sons came as close to possible as losing an eye. I'm over it, he's over it, but it was a freak accident that forever altered his future. The hardest part for me was to see a 15 year old come to grips with something like this - it's probably harder than the injury itself. Anyway, in the process of learning all about the human eye, and it's incredible DESIGN, I have come to the conclusion that evolution is not a reasonable scientific theory. Period. The above statement is dogmatic, and I freely admit to it being so. And I will state that I am a Christian believer, but don't let that deter you. I am also an engineer in training, and there is no way I could ever conclude that the human eye could EVER evolve. It is simply too perfect. We look at a high end, state of the art motherboard, multiple layers, cooling systems, and we know that someone verybright and creative has designed this miracle of technology. Then we look at life and conclude it's random? Semi random? It isn't reasonable. just a different perspective. Now returning to randomly beating on my keyboard, hoping a functional piece of s/w emerges....
Charlie Gilley Will program for food... Whoever said children were cheaper by the dozen... lied. Overheard in a cubicle: "A project is just a bug under development." Seeking to rise above the intelligence of a one eared rabbit... Caught in a vortex of weirdness...
-
You know, this is definitely soap-box stuff, but I just have to weigh in here... a few years ago, one of my sons came as close to possible as losing an eye. I'm over it, he's over it, but it was a freak accident that forever altered his future. The hardest part for me was to see a 15 year old come to grips with something like this - it's probably harder than the injury itself. Anyway, in the process of learning all about the human eye, and it's incredible DESIGN, I have come to the conclusion that evolution is not a reasonable scientific theory. Period. The above statement is dogmatic, and I freely admit to it being so. And I will state that I am a Christian believer, but don't let that deter you. I am also an engineer in training, and there is no way I could ever conclude that the human eye could EVER evolve. It is simply too perfect. We look at a high end, state of the art motherboard, multiple layers, cooling systems, and we know that someone verybright and creative has designed this miracle of technology. Then we look at life and conclude it's random? Semi random? It isn't reasonable. just a different perspective. Now returning to randomly beating on my keyboard, hoping a functional piece of s/w emerges....
Charlie Gilley Will program for food... Whoever said children were cheaper by the dozen... lied. Overheard in a cubicle: "A project is just a bug under development." Seeking to rise above the intelligence of a one eared rabbit... Caught in a vortex of weirdness...
Incredible eye design? Roughly speaking - we have 24-hour day and during one third of it the human eye is pretty useless. Ergo – Thomas Edison invents a light bulb – both evolution and HUMAN design. That is incredible! Lots of people are using glasses because this “incredible design” is not working for them. An eagle can spot a fish in the water from hundreds of feet above – that is an evolution in action my friend. Why are you giving credit to God who was created by an ignorant human for sole purpose of keeping the flock in ignorance? “Thank God” for separation of churches!
-
You know, this is definitely soap-box stuff, but I just have to weigh in here... a few years ago, one of my sons came as close to possible as losing an eye. I'm over it, he's over it, but it was a freak accident that forever altered his future. The hardest part for me was to see a 15 year old come to grips with something like this - it's probably harder than the injury itself. Anyway, in the process of learning all about the human eye, and it's incredible DESIGN, I have come to the conclusion that evolution is not a reasonable scientific theory. Period. The above statement is dogmatic, and I freely admit to it being so. And I will state that I am a Christian believer, but don't let that deter you. I am also an engineer in training, and there is no way I could ever conclude that the human eye could EVER evolve. It is simply too perfect. We look at a high end, state of the art motherboard, multiple layers, cooling systems, and we know that someone verybright and creative has designed this miracle of technology. Then we look at life and conclude it's random? Semi random? It isn't reasonable. just a different perspective. Now returning to randomly beating on my keyboard, hoping a functional piece of s/w emerges....
Charlie Gilley Will program for food... Whoever said children were cheaper by the dozen... lied. Overheard in a cubicle: "A project is just a bug under development." Seeking to rise above the intelligence of a one eared rabbit... Caught in a vortex of weirdness...
as I said, this is soapbox material. Your faith is apparently stronger than mine.
Charlie Gilley Will program for food... Whoever said children were cheaper by the dozen... lied. Overheard in a cubicle: "A project is just a bug under development." Seeking to rise above the intelligence of a one eared rabbit... Caught in a vortex of weirdness...