Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Site Bugs / Suggestions
  4. Rating Rant

Rating Rant

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Site Bugs / Suggestions
csharpwpfcomtoolstutorial
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Reto Ravasio
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I just got hit by a 1 for my new article[^] and feel quite a bit cheated.
    The average was 5 with 2 votes and then someone comes along and posts a 1 (without comment!) dropping me to 3.4 and straight to the bottom of the category.
    I understand that no voting system is perfect and that it's difficult to solve all kinds of problems but such an obvious abuse should just not be possible.
    What annoys me most is that this is the second time this happened to me (just not so obvious). Of course these spoiler votes get evened out over-time but as I don't expect more than 10 votes for the article I can be happy if the article raises to something above 4 in the years to come. Incidents like this take all the fun and ambition out of being a CPian :-(.
    I think that these extreme low/high samples should be kicked out of the calculation but then I'm not very good at statistics so I wouldn't know how to do it properly. But I still think something should be done.... :mad: btw: see also the Voting - perhaps not?[^] thread.

    realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Reto Ravasio

      I just got hit by a 1 for my new article[^] and feel quite a bit cheated.
      The average was 5 with 2 votes and then someone comes along and posts a 1 (without comment!) dropping me to 3.4 and straight to the bottom of the category.
      I understand that no voting system is perfect and that it's difficult to solve all kinds of problems but such an obvious abuse should just not be possible.
      What annoys me most is that this is the second time this happened to me (just not so obvious). Of course these spoiler votes get evened out over-time but as I don't expect more than 10 votes for the article I can be happy if the article raises to something above 4 in the years to come. Incidents like this take all the fun and ambition out of being a CPian :-(.
      I think that these extreme low/high samples should be kicked out of the calculation but then I'm not very good at statistics so I wouldn't know how to do it properly. But I still think something should be done.... :mad: btw: see also the Voting - perhaps not?[^] thread.

      realJSOPR Offline
      realJSOPR Offline
      realJSOP
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Welcome to CodeProject.

      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
      -----
      "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups