Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Employment Contract Interpretation - invention/creation

Employment Contract Interpretation - invention/creation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
businessquestiondiscussion
48 Posts 34 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S StevenWalsh

    Are you hourly, or salery?

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Leftyfarrell
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    The clause above applies to an employment contract for a full time employee on salary.

    S E 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • L Leftyfarrell

      I'd like some opinions about the following paragraph which appears in an employment contract I received recently. ======= Inventions and creations belong to the Company Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Employee agrees that all copyrightable works created by the Employee or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business are "works made for hire" and shall be the sole and complete property of the Company and that any and all copyrights to such works shall belong to the Company. To the extent such works are not deemed to be "works made for hire," the Employee hereby assigns all proprietary rights, including copyright, in these works to the Company without further compensation. ======= Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Losinger
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Leftyfarrell wrote:

      Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

      yes i'd ask if they'd waive that.

      image processing toolkits | batch image processing

      J J 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • L Leftyfarrell

        The clause above applies to an employment contract for a full time employee on salary.

        S Offline
        S Offline
        StevenWalsh
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Then from my understanding (this is how it was for me before i started contracting, then again your contractor may own the work you do outside of work too... so you'd have to look at your contract) However technically i'd say Its theirs. So if you think you have something, leave wait a while... and BOOM look at your great new product. I'm NOT a lawyer though, so really this is a question you should ask a qualified person with credentials.... THATS A MUST if you're serious.

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Leftyfarrell

          I'd like some opinions about the following paragraph which appears in an employment contract I received recently. ======= Inventions and creations belong to the Company Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Employee agrees that all copyrightable works created by the Employee or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business are "works made for hire" and shall be the sole and complete property of the Company and that any and all copyrights to such works shall belong to the Company. To the extent such works are not deemed to be "works made for hire," the Employee hereby assigns all proprietary rights, including copyright, in these works to the Company without further compensation. ======= Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Marc Clifton
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Leftyfarrell wrote:

          Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company.

          Which is why I'm a consultant. If I create something on my time, it's mine, not the "Company's". And the rest is more of the same--we own you and what you do, think, and piss 24/7/365. You should ask them if any children conceived during the period of employment, directly or indirectly with a woman, is also the sole and exclusive property of the Company. You are performing an act of creation, after all. Maybe they'll pay for the diapers. Marc

          Thyme In The Country
          Interacx
          My Blog

          L D M E 4 Replies Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Losinger

            Leftyfarrell wrote:

            Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

            yes i'd ask if they'd waive that.

            image processing toolkits | batch image processing

            J Offline
            J Offline
            J 0
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Chris Losinger wrote:

            i'd ask if they'd waive that.

            Or try and add a clause that states, as long as something you've created is in use @ the company after you've moved on, you are still entitled to receive paychecks.:-D

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S StevenWalsh

              Then from my understanding (this is how it was for me before i started contracting, then again your contractor may own the work you do outside of work too... so you'd have to look at your contract) However technically i'd say Its theirs. So if you think you have something, leave wait a while... and BOOM look at your great new product. I'm NOT a lawyer though, so really this is a question you should ask a qualified person with credentials.... THATS A MUST if you're serious.

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Leftyfarrell
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Thanks for your opinion. In this case, it is an employment contract for a position I am considering taking, but have not yet signed. I just wanted to gather some opinions on its meaning. I can understand the employer wanting to capitalize on inventions related to their business during my employment, but I obviously disagree with them owning an idea that is unrelated to their business and the work I do for them. If I signed this contract, wouldn't it give them a claim on Firefox or any other open source projects that I might work on in my spare time? That sounds unreasonable to me.

              S A D 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • M Marc Clifton

                Leftyfarrell wrote:

                Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company.

                Which is why I'm a consultant. If I create something on my time, it's mine, not the "Company's". And the rest is more of the same--we own you and what you do, think, and piss 24/7/365. You should ask them if any children conceived during the period of employment, directly or indirectly with a woman, is also the sole and exclusive property of the Company. You are performing an act of creation, after all. Maybe they'll pay for the diapers. Marc

                Thyme In The Country
                Interacx
                My Blog

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Leftyfarrell
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                LOL... great response!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Leftyfarrell

                  Thanks for your opinion. In this case, it is an employment contract for a position I am considering taking, but have not yet signed. I just wanted to gather some opinions on its meaning. I can understand the employer wanting to capitalize on inventions related to their business during my employment, but I obviously disagree with them owning an idea that is unrelated to their business and the work I do for them. If I signed this contract, wouldn't it give them a claim on Firefox or any other open source projects that I might work on in my spare time? That sounds unreasonable to me.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  StevenWalsh
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  It looks like a standard IP contract anyone is going to make you sign. If you've already started the project you should be able to add it as an exception.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Leftyfarrell

                    I'd like some opinions about the following paragraph which appears in an employment contract I received recently. ======= Inventions and creations belong to the Company Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Employee agrees that all copyrightable works created by the Employee or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business are "works made for hire" and shall be the sole and complete property of the Company and that any and all copyrights to such works shall belong to the Company. To the extent such works are not deemed to be "works made for hire," the Employee hereby assigns all proprietary rights, including copyright, in these works to the Company without further compensation. ======= Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Maximilien
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    If it's unrelated to your current employment ( in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations") or or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business) , I don't see a problem. BUT : IANAL


                    Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Leftyfarrell

                      I'd like some opinions about the following paragraph which appears in an employment contract I received recently. ======= Inventions and creations belong to the Company Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Employee agrees that all copyrightable works created by the Employee or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business are "works made for hire" and shall be the sole and complete property of the Company and that any and all copyrights to such works shall belong to the Company. To the extent such works are not deemed to be "works made for hire," the Employee hereby assigns all proprietary rights, including copyright, in these works to the Company without further compensation. ======= Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Member 96
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      You'll have to ask a lawyer but my reading is that they actually worded that pretty generously and are strictly limiting it to anything that pertains to the company's own business. The key phrase being "..., connected with the Company..."


                      "I don't want more choice. I just want better things!" - Edina Monsoon

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Leftyfarrell

                        I'd like some opinions about the following paragraph which appears in an employment contract I received recently. ======= Inventions and creations belong to the Company Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Employee agrees that all copyrightable works created by the Employee or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business are "works made for hire" and shall be the sole and complete property of the Company and that any and all copyrights to such works shall belong to the Company. To the extent such works are not deemed to be "works made for hire," the Employee hereby assigns all proprietary rights, including copyright, in these works to the Company without further compensation. ======= Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris Maunder
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer. Get advice on this. This is a standard clause to ensure you don't turn around and sue the company and say to them "you owe me a billion dollars because you're using an idea I had and I haven't given you permission". The key words here are:

                        Leftyfarrell wrote:

                        in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company

                        so if you create a company that is not directly or indirectly connected with the Company then this clause does not seem to apply. However, if you do something that is related to company business then you should not be working for the company because you are, in effect, their competition.

                        cheers, Chris Maunder

                        CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Marc Clifton

                          Leftyfarrell wrote:

                          Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company.

                          Which is why I'm a consultant. If I create something on my time, it's mine, not the "Company's". And the rest is more of the same--we own you and what you do, think, and piss 24/7/365. You should ask them if any children conceived during the period of employment, directly or indirectly with a woman, is also the sole and exclusive property of the Company. You are performing an act of creation, after all. Maybe they'll pay for the diapers. Marc

                          Thyme In The Country
                          Interacx
                          My Blog

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Douglas Troy
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Screw the diapers, what about private school?!?! :)


                          :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                          Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Marc Clifton

                            Leftyfarrell wrote:

                            Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company.

                            Which is why I'm a consultant. If I create something on my time, it's mine, not the "Company's". And the rest is more of the same--we own you and what you do, think, and piss 24/7/365. You should ask them if any children conceived during the period of employment, directly or indirectly with a woman, is also the sole and exclusive property of the Company. You are performing an act of creation, after all. Maybe they'll pay for the diapers. Marc

                            Thyme In The Country
                            Interacx
                            My Blog

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Malcolm Smart
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Marc Clifton wrote:

                            directly or indirectly with a woman

                            Just with a woman? So my spate of beastiality, and siring a small litter of dogs would fall outside of this?

                            "More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF

                            "I haven't spoken to my wife now for 48 hours. I don't like to interrupt her.

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Leftyfarrell

                              I'd like some opinions about the following paragraph which appears in an employment contract I received recently. ======= Inventions and creations belong to the Company Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Employee agrees that all copyrightable works created by the Employee or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business are "works made for hire" and shall be the sole and complete property of the Company and that any and all copyrights to such works shall belong to the Company. To the extent such works are not deemed to be "works made for hire," the Employee hereby assigns all proprietary rights, including copyright, in these works to the Company without further compensation. ======= Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Michael Dunn
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              That's pretty standard language, as Chris said. In California, employment agreements have an addendum explicitly spelling out "whatever you do on your own time is yours" - the key there is on your own time. If you use the company's equipment, they might legally have a claim to it.

                              --Mike-- Visual C++ MVP :cool: LINKS~! Ericahist | PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ Hungarian notation FTW

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Malcolm Smart

                                Marc Clifton wrote:

                                directly or indirectly with a woman

                                Just with a woman? So my spate of beastiality, and siring a small litter of dogs would fall outside of this?

                                "More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF

                                "I haven't spoken to my wife now for 48 hours. I don't like to interrupt her.

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Colin Angus Mackay
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                Malcolm Smart wrote:

                                Just with a woman? So my spate of beastiality, and siring a small litter of dogs would fall outside of this?

                                That probably isn't something you really want to admit to. However, I remember my dad telling me about his first arrest (he's now a retired police officer and this was back in the 60s) was when he caught someone interfering* with a sheep. Apparently the sheep was caught by surprise and evacuated its bowels into the man's trousers which were, by this point, around his ankles. * Some people will take offence at the word I want to use, but it is technically the correct term and not a form of cursing as far as I'm concerned, but this is in the lounge so I'll hold my tounge (or keyboard in this case)


                                Upcoming FREE developer events: * Glasgow: Agile in the Enterprise Vs. ISVs, Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ... * Reading: SQL Bits My website

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Leftyfarrell

                                  I'd like some opinions about the following paragraph which appears in an employment contract I received recently. ======= Inventions and creations belong to the Company Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Employee agrees that all copyrightable works created by the Employee or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business are "works made for hire" and shall be the sole and complete property of the Company and that any and all copyrights to such works shall belong to the Company. To the extent such works are not deemed to be "works made for hire," the Employee hereby assigns all proprietary rights, including copyright, in these works to the Company without further compensation. ======= Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  cp9876
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  I am not a lawyer but have had to cope with similar situations. This sounds like a fairly standard employment clause. If you create something that is related to their business in any way, and if it turns out to be valuable, they may want it and would have some sort of claim on it. What you do depends on whether you have much leverage with your employer. The safest approach is to approach your employer for a written exemption for what you are planning - obtaining this often depends on how you approach it. You can often present it as a win-win situation, e.g. "I am going to spend spare time developing technologies for xxx but they will also enable me to improve what I do here", also it may be appropriate to offer them free use of the technology in some way. Point out that you are only prepared to do this if they give you an exemption. Alternatively, make sure that you leave the job while the technology is incomplete and so not worth very much. It can be very hard for them to say that you didn't develop most of it in the few months between leaving them and launching the product.


                                  Peter "Until the invention of the computer, the machine gun was the device that enabled humans to make the most mistakes in the smallest amount of time."

                                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Leftyfarrell

                                    I'd like some opinions about the following paragraph which appears in an employment contract I received recently. ======= Inventions and creations belong to the Company Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Employee agrees that all copyrightable works created by the Employee or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business are "works made for hire" and shall be the sole and complete property of the Company and that any and all copyrights to such works shall belong to the Company. To the extent such works are not deemed to be "works made for hire," the Employee hereby assigns all proprietary rights, including copyright, in these works to the Company without further compensation. ======= Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Ashley van Gerven
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    Leftyfarrell wrote:

                                    has conceived or made or may conceive or make

                                    Any ideas the employee has while under that contract, even if he/she doesn't act on them until after leaving, the company could claim ownership of. So don't date your ideas, should you have to note any.

                                    Leftyfarrell wrote:

                                    directly or indirectly, connected with the Company

                                    What does indirectly mean? I guess even an obscure connection.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C cp9876

                                      I am not a lawyer but have had to cope with similar situations. This sounds like a fairly standard employment clause. If you create something that is related to their business in any way, and if it turns out to be valuable, they may want it and would have some sort of claim on it. What you do depends on whether you have much leverage with your employer. The safest approach is to approach your employer for a written exemption for what you are planning - obtaining this often depends on how you approach it. You can often present it as a win-win situation, e.g. "I am going to spend spare time developing technologies for xxx but they will also enable me to improve what I do here", also it may be appropriate to offer them free use of the technology in some way. Point out that you are only prepared to do this if they give you an exemption. Alternatively, make sure that you leave the job while the technology is incomplete and so not worth very much. It can be very hard for them to say that you didn't develop most of it in the few months between leaving them and launching the product.


                                      Peter "Until the invention of the computer, the machine gun was the device that enabled humans to make the most mistakes in the smallest amount of time."

                                      O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      Orcrist
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      Would you not say that if you approach the company with the idea then you have already "conceived" it while employed by the company and therefore it is their property. At least thats the way I see it... Cheers, David

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Leftyfarrell

                                        I'd like some opinions about the following paragraph which appears in an employment contract I received recently. ======= Inventions and creations belong to the Company Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Employee agrees that all copyrightable works created by the Employee or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business are "works made for hire" and shall be the sole and complete property of the Company and that any and all copyrights to such works shall belong to the Company. To the extent such works are not deemed to be "works made for hire," the Employee hereby assigns all proprietary rights, including copyright, in these works to the Company without further compensation. ======= Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Ravi Bhavnani
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        I think the kicker is the phrase "directly or indirectly, connected with the Company". If your invention isn't connected with the company, you should be good. That being said, pay special heed to any non-compete and moonlighting clauses in your contract. Most fulltime contracts require that you don't hold a second job. /ravi

                                        This is your brain on Celcius Home | Music | Articles | Freeware | Trips ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Leftyfarrell

                                          I'd like some opinions about the following paragraph which appears in an employment contract I received recently. ======= Inventions and creations belong to the Company Any and all "Creations" (i.e. inventions, discoveries, improvements, or creations) which the Employee has conceived or made or may conceive or make during the period of employment in any way, directly or indirectly, connected with the Company (collectively "Creations"), shall be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. The Employee agrees that all copyrightable works created by the Employee or under the Company's direction in connection with the Company's business are "works made for hire" and shall be the sole and complete property of the Company and that any and all copyrights to such works shall belong to the Company. To the extent such works are not deemed to be "works made for hire," the Employee hereby assigns all proprietary rights, including copyright, in these works to the Company without further compensation. ======= Does this mean that if I start my own home business on the side, and build a website that conducts business in a totally unrelated field to that of my employer, they could still lay a claim to that business/website/invention?

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          cmk
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          As others have said this is standard. I would just remind you that, like any contract negotiation, this is their offer. There is nothing wrong with you modifying it (spell out limits of 'indirectly') and presenting it as a counter offer. At the very least voice your concerns and have them clear up any language you consider too vague or unclear.

                                          ...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups