Courtesy of the dissident Frogman
-
Like a suppository, only a bit stronger [^]
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.
Technically speaking, the press agency did not declare that the house was hit by US bullets, but that "An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which she says hit her house following an early coalition forces raid in the predominantly Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City" So, where is the mistake?
-
Like a suppository, only a bit stronger [^]
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.
:laugh: That's fantastic...
every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- Chris Losinger, Online Poker Players?
-
Technically speaking, the press agency did not declare that the house was hit by US bullets, but that "An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which she says hit her house following an early coalition forces raid in the predominantly Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City" So, where is the mistake?
K(arl) wrote:
Technically speaking
Covers many ills, no?
K(arl) wrote:
but that "An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which she says hit her house following an early coalition forces raid in the predominantly Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City"
for honest an objective reporting, the agency should have surmised that coalition forces threw the cartridges against her house, because the "pointy end" was still attached to the "non-pointy end" of both.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.
-
Technically speaking, the press agency did not declare that the house was hit by US bullets, but that "An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which she says hit her house following an early coalition forces raid in the predominantly Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City" So, where is the mistake?
K(arl) wrote:
So, where is the mistake?
Two possible sets of mistakes:
Mistake set #1:
by the old woman: mistaking live cartridges for bullets which she assumed had connected with her house. by the reporter: not commenting on the difference between bullets (which could do some amount of damage when fired at a house) and live cartridges (which are less likely to have done anything interesting).
Alternate mistake set (A.K.A., Mistake set #2):
by coalition forces: chucking live cartridges at houses rather than firing them from some sort of a weapon.
every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- Chris Losinger, Online Poker Players?
-
K(arl) wrote:
Technically speaking
Covers many ills, no?
K(arl) wrote:
but that "An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which she says hit her house following an early coalition forces raid in the predominantly Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City"
for honest an objective reporting, the agency should have surmised that coalition forces threw the cartridges against her house, because the "pointy end" was still attached to the "non-pointy end" of both.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.
I'm searching for the original caption rather than the 'hear says' but did not succeed yet. Anyway, the flow of hatred of this guy would have been more justified if the comment had been "An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which hit her house following an early coalition forces raid". But it was not.
-
K(arl) wrote:
So, where is the mistake?
Two possible sets of mistakes:
Mistake set #1:
by the old woman: mistaking live cartridges for bullets which she assumed had connected with her house. by the reporter: not commenting on the difference between bullets (which could do some amount of damage when fired at a house) and live cartridges (which are less likely to have done anything interesting).
Alternate mistake set (A.K.A., Mistake set #2):
by coalition forces: chucking live cartridges at houses rather than firing them from some sort of a weapon.
every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- Chris Losinger, Online Poker Players?
-
I'm searching for the original caption rather than the 'hear says' but did not succeed yet. Anyway, the flow of hatred of this guy would have been more justified if the comment had been "An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which hit her house following an early coalition forces raid". But it was not.
K(arl) wrote:
I'm searching for the original caption rather than the 'hear says' but did not succeed yet.
Bit of a shame that AFP is so dead-set against Google indexing any of their news... I found the photo with a slightly longer caption on Yahoo! News, but haven't been able to find anything on AFP's site directly. Go figure, the AFP site has no search tool whatsoever...
every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- Chris Losinger, Online Poker Players?
-
K(arl) wrote:
Technically speaking
Covers many ills, no?
K(arl) wrote:
but that "An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which she says hit her house following an early coalition forces raid in the predominantly Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City"
for honest an objective reporting, the agency should have surmised that coalition forces threw the cartridges against her house, because the "pointy end" was still attached to the "non-pointy end" of both.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.
Mike Gaskey wrote:
the agency should have surmised that coalition forces threw the cartridges against her house, because the "pointy end" was still attached to the "non-pointy end" of both.
Either that or the rounds were ejected from a jammed gun by people who were battling outside the elderly women’s house. But then again I doubt the 'outrage' is about whether elderly women’s house was actually hit by weapons fire or not, as what is happening daily in Iraq is far worse.
Surah AlFurqan(Ayah 1-34) Who is the creator? Finding Allah (Video)
-
Or: the comment and the picture clearly demonstrates what the old woman says is nonsense. The intention of disinformation is in the eye of the readers, not necessarily in the one of the writer.
The caption itself, not the quote, referred to the cartridges as bullets. I would agree with you, if the caption made any obvious attempt to draw attention to the discrepancy... but i'm just not seeing it. Just laugh... ;)
every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- Chris Losinger, Online Poker Players?
-
Mike Gaskey wrote:
the agency should have surmised that coalition forces threw the cartridges against her house, because the "pointy end" was still attached to the "non-pointy end" of both.
Either that or the rounds were ejected from a jammed gun by people who were battling outside the elderly women’s house. But then again I doubt the 'outrage' is about whether elderly women’s house was actually hit by weapons fire or not, as what is happening daily in Iraq is far worse.
Surah AlFurqan(Ayah 1-34) Who is the creator? Finding Allah (Video)
A.A. wrote:
then again I doubt the 'outrage' is about whether elderly women’s house was actually hit by weapons fire or not,
I suspect our views differ, but my outrage is of obviously biased reporting. You don't seriously believe she ran out and picked up ejected cartridges, now do you?
A.A. wrote:
what is happening daily in Iraq is far worse.
absolutely no doubt. it would be really be far superior if Iraqi quit killing Iraqi, then our military could take a breather.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.
-
K(arl) wrote:
So, where is the mistake?
Two possible sets of mistakes:
Mistake set #1:
by the old woman: mistaking live cartridges for bullets which she assumed had connected with her house. by the reporter: not commenting on the difference between bullets (which could do some amount of damage when fired at a house) and live cartridges (which are less likely to have done anything interesting).
Alternate mistake set (A.K.A., Mistake set #2):
by coalition forces: chucking live cartridges at houses rather than firing them from some sort of a weapon.
every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- Chris Losinger, Online Poker Players?
I'm not sure (will check tonight), but IIRC the cartridges were IDed as AK47 ammo by the gungeeks on another site I frequent, so it wouldn't be our people who weren't sure how to use a rifle.
-- You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
-
Technically speaking, the press agency did not declare that the house was hit by US bullets, but that "An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which she says hit her house following an early coalition forces raid in the predominantly Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City" So, where is the mistake?
K(arl) wrote:
So, where is the mistake?
Some people (like yourself) will go to any length to defend the indefensible.
-
K(arl) wrote:
So, where is the mistake?
Some people (like yourself) will go to any length to defend the indefensible.
-
I'm not sure (will check tonight), but IIRC the cartridges were IDed as AK47 ammo by the gungeeks on another site I frequent, so it wouldn't be our people who weren't sure how to use a rifle.
-- You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
-
Technically speaking, the press agency did not declare that the house was hit by US bullets, but that "An elderly Iraqi woman shows two bullets which she says hit her house following an early coalition forces raid in the predominantly Shiite Baghdad suburb of Sadr City" So, where is the mistake?
-
K(arl) wrote:
So, where is the mistake?
Since the bullets she held had never been fired her testimony is untrustworthy and her conclusions faulty and more importantly... not news-worthy. The fact that it was published hints at an agenda. Agreed?
Mike Mullikin wrote:
not news-worthy
Agreed. What was news-worthy was the end of the caption.
Mike Mullikin wrote:
The fact that it was published hints at an agenda
An agenda maybe, a political one I don't know. Is the photographer the one who made the caption? Was it made by somebody else? Some journalists are such ignorant and sensationalist I'm not sure there's a political motivation behind. What is however disappointing is that AFP changed the caption afterwards without notice and that it did not deign to explain the circumstances. COmpared to what Reuters did, this is shocking. I found a picture of the original publication here[^] A question: everybody got fixed on the bullet, but not on the end of the caption:
-
I'm not sure (will check tonight), but IIRC the cartridges were IDed as AK47 ammo by the gungeeks on another site I frequent, so it wouldn't be our people who weren't sure how to use a rifle.
-- You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
-
Mike Mullikin wrote:
not news-worthy
Agreed. What was news-worthy was the end of the caption.
Mike Mullikin wrote:
The fact that it was published hints at an agenda
An agenda maybe, a political one I don't know. Is the photographer the one who made the caption? Was it made by somebody else? Some journalists are such ignorant and sensationalist I'm not sure there's a political motivation behind. What is however disappointing is that AFP changed the caption afterwards without notice and that it did not deign to explain the circumstances. COmpared to what Reuters did, this is shocking. I found a picture of the original publication here[^] A question: everybody got fixed on the bullet, but not on the end of the caption:
K(arl) wrote:
What was news-worthy was the end of the caption.
I doubt they'd publish a proper photo for that. Who'd want to see it? X| :sigh:
every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- Chris Losinger, Online Poker Players?
-
K(arl) wrote:
What was news-worthy was the end of the caption.
I doubt they'd publish a proper photo for that. Who'd want to see it? X| :sigh:
every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- Chris Losinger, Online Poker Players?
-
The folks that don't need a picture to see it. Probably. Hopefully...
every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- Chris Losinger, Online Poker Players?
