Of mice and men
-
I have no problem at all in insulting people like you. Don't give me the "I know what I'm talking about and you're just an ignorant fool" crap. Your work is a farce, except it's not evcen funny. It is sadistic crap. It is little short of evil - giving false hope to people while causing unnecessary suffering to animals on an immense scale. If you think I'm insulting you now, you ain't seen nothing.
Fred_Smith wrote:
If you think I'm insulting you now, you ain't seen nothing.
If a guy who does this[^] complimented my position on animal research, I just might take it as an insult. I certainly hope you don't have any children and, if you ever do, I certainly hope they never get cancer. I imagine that you're the type to refuse treatment and sentence them to death.
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
-
Right, right. You can use all sorts of "alternative" remedies that provide all the risks of real medicine with none of the benefits. At least the hacksaw actually does something, but by all means go with whatever feels right. Just be sure not to chicken out later, because I don't want the costs of emergency treatments for people like you to be reflected in my insurance costs.
James L. Thomson wrote:
I don't want the costs of emergency treatments for people like you to be reflected in my insurance costs.
Of course you don't - you'll happily take the pain, suffering and death of millions of sentient beings to save you from a headache, but won't give an inch to anyone who dares to disagree with you. Well, don't worry, some of us have integrity and you won't find me cluttering up your precious hospital beds. Much good may that fact do you.
-
James L. Thomson wrote:
I don't want the costs of emergency treatments for people like you to be reflected in my insurance costs.
Of course you don't - you'll happily take the pain, suffering and death of millions of sentient beings to save you from a headache, but won't give an inch to anyone who dares to disagree with you. Well, don't worry, some of us have integrity and you won't find me cluttering up your precious hospital beds. Much good may that fact do you.
Do you have dreadlocks?
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
If you think I'm insulting you now, you ain't seen nothing.
If a guy who does this[^] complimented my position on animal research, I just might take it as an insult. I certainly hope you don't have any children and, if you ever do, I certainly hope they never get cancer. I imagine that you're the type to refuse treatment and sentence them to death.
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
They would get the best treatment available - which would be nowhere near any hospital you'd send yours to die in. I reckon mine would stand a better chance of sirvival than yours, whatever the type of cancer they had. And have a better quality of life in the meantime. If it was down to me, I'd have you all done for child cruelty, for giving your kids radiation therapy and chemo and sentencing them to life-imprisonment in some ghastly hospital ward or hospice while they're dying.
-
Do you have dreadlocks?
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
Do you have balls?
-
I have no problem at all in insulting people like you. Don't give me the "I know what I'm talking about and you're just an ignorant fool" crap. Your work is a farce, except it's not evcen funny. It is sadistic crap. It is little short of evil - giving false hope to people while causing unnecessary suffering to animals on an immense scale. If you think I'm insulting you now, you ain't seen nothing.
Fred_Smith wrote:
I have no problem at all in insulting people like you. Don't give me the "I know what I'm talking about and you're just an ignorant fool" crap. Your work is a farce, except it's not evcen funny. It is sadistic crap. It is little short of evil - giving false hope to people while causing unnecessary suffering to animals on an immense scale. If you think I'm insulting you now, you ain't seen nothing.
You can't insult me, so quit running your mouth. Instead of posting endless reams of your drivel on here, why don't you demonstrate you have something to contribute instead of ignorance. Ever visited a terminal cancer ward? No, you haven't. Especially a pediatric one. Why don't you go do that? While you're at it, why don't you also look at the available cancer treatments they use on animals too - you know, to save and respect life of not just people but animals too. I know you won't because I know that's not important to you. You're just a sadist who enjoys watching people, children and animals suffer.
-
James L. Thomson wrote:
I don't want the costs of emergency treatments for people like you to be reflected in my insurance costs.
Of course you don't - you'll happily take the pain, suffering and death of millions of sentient beings to save you from a headache, but won't give an inch to anyone who dares to disagree with you. Well, don't worry, some of us have integrity and you won't find me cluttering up your precious hospital beds. Much good may that fact do you.
I can't help but notice that you didn't try to refute my point about alt-meds not actually doing anything.
-
They would get the best treatment available - which would be nowhere near any hospital you'd send yours to die in. I reckon mine would stand a better chance of sirvival than yours, whatever the type of cancer they had. And have a better quality of life in the meantime. If it was down to me, I'd have you all done for child cruelty, for giving your kids radiation therapy and chemo and sentencing them to life-imprisonment in some ghastly hospital ward or hospice while they're dying.
Fred_Smith wrote:
They would get the best treatment available - which would be nowhere near any hospital you'd send yours to die in. I reckon mine would stand a better chance of sirvival than yours, whatever the type of cancer they had. And have a better quality of life in the meantime. If it was down to me, I'd have you all done for child cruelty, for giving your kids radiation therapy and chemo and sentencing them to life-imprisonment in some ghastly hospital ward or hospice while they're dying.
You like to run-off at the mouth. You post alot of big words, but they're vacuous. I have an idea - why don't you go watch a terminal cancer patient die before you write this shit.
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
I have no problem at all in insulting people like you. Don't give me the "I know what I'm talking about and you're just an ignorant fool" crap. Your work is a farce, except it's not evcen funny. It is sadistic crap. It is little short of evil - giving false hope to people while causing unnecessary suffering to animals on an immense scale. If you think I'm insulting you now, you ain't seen nothing.
You can't insult me, so quit running your mouth. Instead of posting endless reams of your drivel on here, why don't you demonstrate you have something to contribute instead of ignorance. Ever visited a terminal cancer ward? No, you haven't. Especially a pediatric one. Why don't you go do that? While you're at it, why don't you also look at the available cancer treatments they use on animals too - you know, to save and respect life of not just people but animals too. I know you won't because I know that's not important to you. You're just a sadist who enjoys watching people, children and animals suffer.
I spent three days and nights without (hardly any) sleep watching my father die in a cancer ward, sh*thead, so f*** off and die. And no-one that supports vivisection has any right to accuse someone else of enjoying watching animals suffer. You, in your line of work, have caused or supported more suffering than I ever will in tem thousand lifetimes.
-
I can't help but notice that you didn't try to refute my point about alt-meds not actually doing anything.
Fine. I refute it.
-
I can't help but notice that you didn't try to refute my point about alt-meds not actually doing anything.
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
They would get the best treatment available - which would be nowhere near any hospital you'd send yours to die in. I reckon mine would stand a better chance of sirvival than yours, whatever the type of cancer they had. And have a better quality of life in the meantime. If it was down to me, I'd have you all done for child cruelty, for giving your kids radiation therapy and chemo and sentencing them to life-imprisonment in some ghastly hospital ward or hospice while they're dying.
You like to run-off at the mouth. You post alot of big words, but they're vacuous. I have an idea - why don't you go watch a terminal cancer patient die before you write this shit.
what makes you think I haven't, dick-head?
-
I spent three days and nights without (hardly any) sleep watching my father die in a cancer ward, sh*thead, so f*** off and die. And no-one that supports vivisection has any right to accuse someone else of enjoying watching animals suffer. You, in your line of work, have caused or supported more suffering than I ever will in tem thousand lifetimes.
Fred_Smith wrote:
I spent three days and nights without (hardly any) sleep watching my father die in a cancer ward, sh*thead, so f*** off and die. And no-one that supports vivisection has any right to accuse someone else of enjoying watching animals suffer. You, in your line of work, have caused or supported more suffering than I ever will in tem thousand lifetimes.
Removed for privacy... I also watched upwards of 50 other children die on the pediatric ward on which I was working. You're a first-class idiot.
Fred_Smith wrote:
sh*thead, so f*** off and die.
There you go. That says it all about you, just like I said. -- modified at 12:23 Tuesday 9th October, 2007
-
what makes you think I haven't, dick-head?
Fred_Smith wrote:
what makes you think I haven't, dick-head?
Because you're an idiot, that's what.
-
They would get the best treatment available - which would be nowhere near any hospital you'd send yours to die in. I reckon mine would stand a better chance of sirvival than yours, whatever the type of cancer they had. And have a better quality of life in the meantime. If it was down to me, I'd have you all done for child cruelty, for giving your kids radiation therapy and chemo and sentencing them to life-imprisonment in some ghastly hospital ward or hospice while they're dying.
Fred_Smith wrote:
I reckon mine would stand a better chance of sirvival than yours, whatever the type of cancer they had.
So how would you treat Stage I Hodgkins Lymphoma that improves on a 5 year survival rate of 90-95% using conventional treatment?
- F
-
I spent three days and nights without (hardly any) sleep watching my father die in a cancer ward, sh*thead, so f*** off and die. And no-one that supports vivisection has any right to accuse someone else of enjoying watching animals suffer. You, in your line of work, have caused or supported more suffering than I ever will in tem thousand lifetimes.
Fred_Smith wrote:
I spent three days and nights without (hardly any) sleep watching my father die in a cancer ward, sh*thead, so f*** off and die.
And yet you still seek to deny others the benefits of cancer reasearch. You truly are a monster.
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
I spent three days and nights without (hardly any) sleep watching my father die in a cancer ward, sh*thead, so f*** off and die. And no-one that supports vivisection has any right to accuse someone else of enjoying watching animals suffer. You, in your line of work, have caused or supported more suffering than I ever will in tem thousand lifetimes.
Removed for privacy... I also watched upwards of 50 other children die on the pediatric ward on which I was working. You're a first-class idiot.
Fred_Smith wrote:
sh*thead, so f*** off and die.
There you go. That says it all about you, just like I said. -- modified at 12:23 Tuesday 9th October, 2007
Is it just me, or has the general caliber of individuals here declined sharply in recent months?
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
-
Is it just me, or has the general caliber of individuals here declined sharply in recent months?
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
Red Stateler wrote:
Is it just me, or has the general caliber of individuals here declined sharply in recent months?
This one is a real winner. I like his sob story about his 3 days and nights with his father. What did he think that was, some kind of trump card he had that he's the only one that ever watched a loved one die? He's a repugnant individual. He's even worse than that ChrisMcCall guy... What an unbelievable lack of morality these two exhibit.
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
I spent three days and nights without (hardly any) sleep watching my father die in a cancer ward, sh*thead, so f*** off and die. And no-one that supports vivisection has any right to accuse someone else of enjoying watching animals suffer. You, in your line of work, have caused or supported more suffering than I ever will in tem thousand lifetimes.
Removed for privacy... I also watched upwards of 50 other children die on the pediatric ward on which I was working. You're a first-class idiot.
Fred_Smith wrote:
sh*thead, so f*** off and die.
There you go. That says it all about you, just like I said. -- modified at 12:23 Tuesday 9th October, 2007
73Zeppelin wrote:
I also watched upwards of 50 other children die on the pediatric ward on which I was working
Didn't save many then, did you, with your wonderful animal-tested drugs? And wouldn't their final hours have been better at home, in familiar surroundings, instead of a sterile hospital?
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
I spent three days and nights without (hardly any) sleep watching my father die in a cancer ward, sh*thead, so f*** off and die.
And yet you still seek to deny others the benefits of cancer reasearch. You truly are a monster.
What benefits? And at what price?