where are the lefties?
-
Nice. X| The situation, in part caused by US foreign policy and American based globalists, justifies any means to whatever end. Or in other words, their terrorism justifies our terrorism causing their terrorism causing our terrorism... Now where have I come across that before? Oh yes, out of the mouths of fudamentalists, haters and those doomed to destroy themselves just about anywhere and everywhere throughout history. I just hope you were being sarcastic because the alternative in millstones, necks and all that jazz. Good by miss American pie. Frankly no-one so stupid should be allowed to get out of school in this age of nuclear weapons and global communications. The world is not safe with you in it.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
Or in other words, their terrorism justifies our terrorism causing their terrorism causing our terrorism...
He said we would wage war, not engage in terrorism. You do know the difference, right?
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
-
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
justified arming UNITA, the private army of a madman
Unlike Sam Nujoma?
Brady Kelly wrote:
Sam Nujoma
I don't know much about him but my Mother had friends in Namibia for many years until very recently and I haven't been hearing tales of burned villages and machine gunning of civillians. Is he bad? Who is supporting him? I would be very sad to see Namibia go down the pan, relatives of mine where in the volunteer army that freed Namibia during the second World War. I've forgotten much of the detail but they marched accross one of the most hostile deserts in the world to launch a surprise attack on a German garrison and routed them. Not bad for a bunch of farmers.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
Or in other words, their terrorism justifies our terrorism causing their terrorism causing our terrorism...
He said we would wage war, not engage in terrorism. You do know the difference, right?
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
Yes I do know the difference. Unfortunatly by acts such as redefining torture so that it isn't torture the US government has blurred the distinction in law to the point where it is no longer a difference. See Ed Brown currently being held without access to lawyer and suffering solitary confinement, sensory deprivation and other forms of turture in the US, as a US citizen, for daring to refuse to obey an illegal tax demand. If this is how the US treats it own then their troops should not even qualify to take part in UN peace keeping. The application of fear, generated by illegal killing, for the end purpose of applying politcal pressure to ellected and legitimate authorities has been a staple of US foreign policy in South America, the Far East and Middle East for decades, not to mention the false flag NATO funded terrorism in Europe in the 1960s and 70s.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Nice. X| The situation, in part caused by US foreign policy and American based globalists, justifies any means to whatever end. Or in other words, their terrorism justifies our terrorism causing their terrorism causing our terrorism... Now where have I come across that before? Oh yes, out of the mouths of fudamentalists, haters and those doomed to destroy themselves just about anywhere and everywhere throughout history. I just hope you were being sarcastic because the alternative in millstones, necks and all that jazz. Good by miss American pie. Frankly no-one so stupid should be allowed to get out of school in this age of nuclear weapons and global communications. The world is not safe with you in it.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
Now where have I come across that before? Oh yes, out of the mouths of fudamentalists, haters and those doomed to destroy themselves just about anywhere and everywhere throughout history. I just hope you were being sarcastic because the alternative in millstones, necks and all that jazz. Good by miss American pie. Frankly no-one so stupid should be allowed to get out of school in this age of nuclear weapons and global communications. The world is not safe with you in it.
Nice sermon - aside from being utterly void of meaning. If there is insufficient will in the international community to hold those nations produceing terrorism responsible for the behavior of their own citizens, than what you are saying is that we just need to live with it as the legitimate consequence of our foreign policy and 'globalists'? Are you saying that American foriegn policy and globalism warrents resistence from the international community even if that resistence is in the form of terrorism?
The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.
-
Brady Kelly wrote:
Sam Nujoma
I don't know much about him but my Mother had friends in Namibia for many years until very recently and I haven't been hearing tales of burned villages and machine gunning of civillians. Is he bad? Who is supporting him? I would be very sad to see Namibia go down the pan, relatives of mine where in the volunteer army that freed Namibia during the second World War. I've forgotten much of the detail but they marched accross one of the most hostile deserts in the world to launch a surprise attack on a German garrison and routed them. Not bad for a bunch of farmers.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
I would be very sad to see Namibia go down the pan, relatives of mine where in the volunteer army that freed Namibia during the second World War. I've forgotten much of the detail but they marched accross one of the most hostile deserts in the world to launch a surprise attack on a German garrison and routed them. Not bad for a bunch of farmers.
First world war. Germany didn't have any African possessions left for the second.
-- If you view money as inherently evil, I view it as my duty to assist in making you more virtuous.
-
Yes I do know the difference. Unfortunatly by acts such as redefining torture so that it isn't torture the US government has blurred the distinction in law to the point where it is no longer a difference. See Ed Brown currently being held without access to lawyer and suffering solitary confinement, sensory deprivation and other forms of turture in the US, as a US citizen, for daring to refuse to obey an illegal tax demand. If this is how the US treats it own then their troops should not even qualify to take part in UN peace keeping. The application of fear, generated by illegal killing, for the end purpose of applying politcal pressure to ellected and legitimate authorities has been a staple of US foreign policy in South America, the Far East and Middle East for decades, not to mention the false flag NATO funded terrorism in Europe in the 1960s and 70s.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
See Ed Brown
"We're not conspiracy theorists," Brown said, settling into a chair on his unfinished concrete porch. "We deal with conspiracy facts. Freemasonry and Judaism -- that is the truth. That is the fact. That is where all the world's problems come from . . . I know for a fact that they're working together."
You are a fan of vile antisemitic nutjobs. Here's hoping he's getting raeped.
-
Yes I do know the difference. Unfortunatly by acts such as redefining torture so that it isn't torture the US government has blurred the distinction in law to the point where it is no longer a difference. See Ed Brown currently being held without access to lawyer and suffering solitary confinement, sensory deprivation and other forms of turture in the US, as a US citizen, for daring to refuse to obey an illegal tax demand. If this is how the US treats it own then their troops should not even qualify to take part in UN peace keeping. The application of fear, generated by illegal killing, for the end purpose of applying politcal pressure to ellected and legitimate authorities has been a staple of US foreign policy in South America, the Far East and Middle East for decades, not to mention the false flag NATO funded terrorism in Europe in the 1960s and 70s.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
Yes I do know the difference. Unfortunatly by acts such as redefining torture so that it isn't torture the US government has blurred the distinction in law to the point where it is no longer a difference.
"War" isn't governed by laws (thus demonstrating that you actually don't know what war is). Are you saying that Vietnam (which practiced horrendous torture techniques....Not the keeping-the-lights-on "torture") was not at "war" with the United States by virtue of that fact? Are you saying that any war prior to the Geneva convention (which legally does not apply to non-uniformed combatants) is suddenly redefined to be something other than a "war"? How absurd.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
See Ed Brown currently being held without access to lawyer and suffering solitary confinement, sensory deprivation and other forms of turture in the US, as a US citizen, for daring to refuse to obey an illegal tax demand. If this is how the US treats it own then their troops should not even qualify to take part in UN peace keeping.
:laugh: Oh brother. You're a hoot. So these tax evaders who were arrested a few days ago are now being "tortured"? Really? Do you know how grave a sin it is to, as a Christian, bear false witness against your neighbor? It's really troublesome how easily you will lie about your fellow man in order to support your completely irrational delusions of persecution.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
The application of fear, generated by illegal killing, for the end purpose of applying politcal pressure to ellected and legitimate authorities has been a staple of US foreign policy in South America, the Far East and Middle East for decades, not to mention the false flag NATO funded terrorism in Europe in the 1960s and 70s.
The various battles in South America and Asia were designed to counter communist insurgencies (i.e. terrorist attacks). There were various civil wars and the US supported the anti-communist sides. Of course, you seem to have no problem redefining every "war" in history to be an act of terrorism in order to defend the acts of terrorists. But then again, I wouldn't expect anything else from a madman.
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
-
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
I would be very sad to see Namibia go down the pan, relatives of mine where in the volunteer army that freed Namibia during the second World War. I've forgotten much of the detail but they marched accross one of the most hostile deserts in the world to launch a surprise attack on a German garrison and routed them. Not bad for a bunch of farmers.
First world war. Germany didn't have any African possessions left for the second.
-- If you view money as inherently evil, I view it as my duty to assist in making you more virtuous.
Must have been. I must make sure to get my Mother to write down all the details before the story is lost for good. It was my maternal grandfathers cousin and uncle involved if I remember rightly, which would make sense for WWI.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
See Ed Brown
"We're not conspiracy theorists," Brown said, settling into a chair on his unfinished concrete porch. "We deal with conspiracy facts. Freemasonry and Judaism -- that is the truth. That is the fact. That is where all the world's problems come from . . . I know for a fact that they're working together."
You are a fan of vile antisemitic nutjobs. Here's hoping he's getting raeped.
I'm curious to know which one of his voices told him that Ed Brown is being "tortured". Faithfull always seems to have excessive insider information.
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
-
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
See Ed Brown
"We're not conspiracy theorists," Brown said, settling into a chair on his unfinished concrete porch. "We deal with conspiracy facts. Freemasonry and Judaism -- that is the truth. That is the fact. That is where all the world's problems come from . . . I know for a fact that they're working together."
You are a fan of vile antisemitic nutjobs. Here's hoping he's getting raeped.
Don't confuse your 'my enemies enemy is my friend' foolishness with me. I accord no special place to Ed Brown that I would not reserve for every other human being. That's the difference between me and you. Even vile antisemtic nutjobs and idiots deserve justice and equality under the law. That is what your country is supposed to be all about. If not you no longer have a country. As I said, it's over.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Don't confuse your 'my enemies enemy is my friend' foolishness with me. I accord no special place to Ed Brown that I would not reserve for every other human being. That's the difference between me and you. Even vile antisemtic nutjobs and idiots deserve justice and equality under the law. That is what your country is supposed to be all about. If not you no longer have a country. As I said, it's over.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
Even vile antisemtic nutjobs and idiots deserve justice and equality under the law.
Having made the arbitrary claim that Ed Brown is being tortured, would you care to provide evidence of this claim, you crazy son of a b****?
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
-
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
Now where have I come across that before? Oh yes, out of the mouths of fudamentalists, haters and those doomed to destroy themselves just about anywhere and everywhere throughout history. I just hope you were being sarcastic because the alternative in millstones, necks and all that jazz. Good by miss American pie. Frankly no-one so stupid should be allowed to get out of school in this age of nuclear weapons and global communications. The world is not safe with you in it.
Nice sermon - aside from being utterly void of meaning. If there is insufficient will in the international community to hold those nations produceing terrorism responsible for the behavior of their own citizens, than what you are saying is that we just need to live with it as the legitimate consequence of our foreign policy and 'globalists'? Are you saying that American foriegn policy and globalism warrents resistence from the international community even if that resistence is in the form of terrorism?
The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Are you saying that American foriegn policy and globalism warrents resistence from the international community even if that resistence is in the form of terrorism?
No what I'm saying is that all terrorism is UNJUSTIFIED, whoever commits it. Calling it something else, or arbitrarily declaring it legal is no excuse and makes no difference.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Are you saying that American foriegn policy and globalism warrents resistence from the international community even if that resistence is in the form of terrorism?
No what I'm saying is that all terrorism is UNJUSTIFIED, whoever commits it. Calling it something else, or arbitrarily declaring it legal is no excuse and makes no difference.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
No what I'm saying is that all terrorism is UNJUSTIFIED, whoever commits it.
And you also equate war to terrorism. Therefore, going to war with a nation that launches terrorist attacks against us constitutes terrorism and is therefore unjustified. Therefore, we should just take it. Great!
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
-
Don't confuse your 'my enemies enemy is my friend' foolishness with me. I accord no special place to Ed Brown that I would not reserve for every other human being. That's the difference between me and you. Even vile antisemtic nutjobs and idiots deserve justice and equality under the law. That is what your country is supposed to be all about. If not you no longer have a country. As I said, it's over.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
your country
I'm Welsh.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
justice and equality under the law
Refusing to pay tax on 2 million dollars of your wife's income is apparently very illegal in the US. As is resisting arrest. No membership of Aryan Nations required. The fact that he is a dreadful human being is just a happy coincidence, rather like seeing Johnathon King arrested as a pederast.
-
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
Yes I do know the difference. Unfortunatly by acts such as redefining torture so that it isn't torture the US government has blurred the distinction in law to the point where it is no longer a difference.
"War" isn't governed by laws (thus demonstrating that you actually don't know what war is). Are you saying that Vietnam (which practiced horrendous torture techniques....Not the keeping-the-lights-on "torture") was not at "war" with the United States by virtue of that fact? Are you saying that any war prior to the Geneva convention (which legally does not apply to non-uniformed combatants) is suddenly redefined to be something other than a "war"? How absurd.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
See Ed Brown currently being held without access to lawyer and suffering solitary confinement, sensory deprivation and other forms of turture in the US, as a US citizen, for daring to refuse to obey an illegal tax demand. If this is how the US treats it own then their troops should not even qualify to take part in UN peace keeping.
:laugh: Oh brother. You're a hoot. So these tax evaders who were arrested a few days ago are now being "tortured"? Really? Do you know how grave a sin it is to, as a Christian, bear false witness against your neighbor? It's really troublesome how easily you will lie about your fellow man in order to support your completely irrational delusions of persecution.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
The application of fear, generated by illegal killing, for the end purpose of applying politcal pressure to ellected and legitimate authorities has been a staple of US foreign policy in South America, the Far East and Middle East for decades, not to mention the false flag NATO funded terrorism in Europe in the 1960s and 70s.
The various battles in South America and Asia were designed to counter communist insurgencies (i.e. terrorist attacks). There were various civil wars and the US supported the anti-communist sides. Of course, you seem to have no problem redefining every "war" in history to be an act of terrorism in order to defend the acts of terrorists. But then again, I wouldn't expect anything else from a madman.
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
To accuse me of lies when I haven't actually said any of the things you seem to think I have is plain idiotic. I made no attempt to define let alone redefine war and didn't mention the Geneva conventions. I have reported what Ed Brown has said about his own situation, this cannot be construed as bearing false witness against him even if he was making it up. You complete idiot. Your justification of intefering in foreign sovereign states against their laws and your own because it was all
Red Stateler wrote:
designed to counter communist insurgencies
is exactly the hypocritical sort of position I was criticising in the first place. Being called a madman by you would be compliment if I could be sure you actually understood your own words let alone mine.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
To accuse me of lies when I haven't actually said any of the things you seem to think I have is plain idiotic. I made no attempt to define let alone redefine war and didn't mention the Geneva conventions. I have reported what Ed Brown has said about his own situation, this cannot be construed as bearing false witness against him even if he was making it up. You complete idiot. Your justification of intefering in foreign sovereign states against their laws and your own because it was all
Red Stateler wrote:
designed to counter communist insurgencies
is exactly the hypocritical sort of position I was criticising in the first place. Being called a madman by you would be compliment if I could be sure you actually understood your own words let alone mine.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
To accuse me of lies when I haven't actually said any of the things you seem to think I have is plain idiotic.
You said "See Ed Brown currently being held without access to lawyer and suffering solitary confinement, sensory deprivation and other forms of turture in the US, as a US citizen, for daring to refuse to obey an illegal tax demand". You did not say that Ed Brown "said" any of those things. You said that he is "being held without access to lawyer and suffering solitary confinement, sensory deprivation and other forms of turture in the US". That is plainly bearing false witness against the good men and women who run the prison that he will hopefully rot away in. That is, unless you can provide evidence of this fact. Can you provide evidence, you pathetic swine? You make so many unsubstantiated claims (i.e. bearing false witness) which I typically dismiss as irrational support of your delusions of persecution. But just for fun, I'll confront you on this particular one. Of course, I know that you'll just ignore my demands for evidence and instead go off on an unrelated tangent composed of innumerable run-on sentences.
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Are you saying that American foriegn policy and globalism warrents resistence from the international community even if that resistence is in the form of terrorism?
No what I'm saying is that all terrorism is UNJUSTIFIED, whoever commits it. Calling it something else, or arbitrarily declaring it legal is no excuse and makes no difference.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
So, defending yourself against terrorism is terrorism?
The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.
-
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
your country
I'm Welsh.
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
justice and equality under the law
Refusing to pay tax on 2 million dollars of your wife's income is apparently very illegal in the US. As is resisting arrest. No membership of Aryan Nations required. The fact that he is a dreadful human being is just a happy coincidence, rather like seeing Johnathon King arrested as a pederast.
Ryan Roberts wrote:
I'm Welsh.
Good for you.:)
Ryan Roberts wrote:
Refusing to pay tax on 2 million dollars of your wife's income is apparently very illegal in the US.
Technically no, it is the tax demand itself which is a forgery and has no legal basis. The conviction in a lower court would be valid except that it contradicts the previous decisions of higher courts and of the Congress in not passing the 16th ammendment. No unapportioned personal income tax can be legal under the US constitution without such an ammendment. Resisting arrest is currently a charge with no basis and for which no evidence can be produced as the only people present where the accused and police who where pretending not be police. In other words pretending not to have the authority to arrest and having a conflict of interest over the charge. It will never stand up if they press it.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
Matthew Faithfull wrote:
To accuse me of lies when I haven't actually said any of the things you seem to think I have is plain idiotic.
You said "See Ed Brown currently being held without access to lawyer and suffering solitary confinement, sensory deprivation and other forms of turture in the US, as a US citizen, for daring to refuse to obey an illegal tax demand". You did not say that Ed Brown "said" any of those things. You said that he is "being held without access to lawyer and suffering solitary confinement, sensory deprivation and other forms of turture in the US". That is plainly bearing false witness against the good men and women who run the prison that he will hopefully rot away in. That is, unless you can provide evidence of this fact. Can you provide evidence, you pathetic swine? You make so many unsubstantiated claims (i.e. bearing false witness) which I typically dismiss as irrational support of your delusions of persecution. But just for fun, I'll confront you on this particular one. Of course, I know that you'll just ignore my demands for evidence and instead go off on an unrelated tangent composed of innumerable run-on sentences.
Anybody rape your wife yet? -IAmChrisMcCall
You really have no clue. By now you should have worked out that randomly throwing mud at me will in the end destroy what remaining shreds of credibility you have amongst the few who still bother to read anything you post. Ed Brown[^]
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
-
So, defending yourself against terrorism is terrorism?
The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.
Only if you use terrorism to do so.
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.