UN conference in Bali. [modified]
-
Thanks for the vote ofconfidence. Its good to know some people appreciate my onslaught on AGW.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
The people who lambaste you are hardly the most respectable visitors to this forum. I'm sure there are a lot of us who find what you write very interesting. We're just not as vocal.
Cheers Tom Philosophy: The art of never getting beyond the concept of life.
Religion: Morality taking credit for the work of luck.
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." - Marcus Aurelius -
fat_boy wrote:
Only kidding. Its a classic way to get rid of someone who constantly jumps on your posts.
You did insult MmmBop...:mad: OK, so MAYBE I am a silly, loser kid sometimes (often), but...can you blame me? You'd better not. ;P But you shoulda known it wouldn't get rid of me. Although I did feel oddly compelled to go 'beddie byes' last night. :suss: I did, in fact.
It may be a jewel of open-source, but Firefox is just a browser. It shows web pages. What the hell is wrong with us?!
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
OK, so MAYBE I am a silly, loser kid sometimes (often),
Why do you say that?
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
but...can you blame me?
If you were yes, but you probably arent so no.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
But you shoulda known it wouldn't get rid of me.
Yes, you seem to have the persistence of fish sauce. ;)
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
So I just contaced John Hay, the UN FCC conference spokes person and asked him some questions: 1) 10,000 yes really, 10,000 people are going to attend the conference in Bali for 2 weeks. And thats not including the press, who no doubt will number at least 1,000. 2) He wasnt forthcoming regarding the Carbon Footprint of the conference, I expect it hasnt even beem calculated, but assume each person, probably flying business class (on your tax money), has a total weight of around around 100 kg, then thats 1,100,000 kgs of 'airfright' alone created by the confernce. Whats the carbon footprint of that lot for a 12 hour flight? So using Flight Emissions Calculator[^] one can calculate that for a flight from Denmark to Indonesia each person costs 2.5 tonnes of CO2. Thats 27,500 tonnes of CO2 just for the flights say. But theres more! Check out this seductively glossy production: climate change conference 2OO7[^] and particularly page 18. (Thats just after the 5* hotel list (alsoo on your tax money), the 'Optional Tours' section. Yes, you can spend 6 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours, or 4 days driving and flying around the wonderful islands of indonesia lapping up the cultural beauty and atmosphere (before it is all wiped out ny Global Warming that is). The general conditions make interesting reading: Inclusive in Tour Price: Tour and transfers as mentioned in the itinerary with private airconditioned vehicle. English speaking guide. Entrance fee, donation fee and luggage handling. Accommodation at Hotel. Exclusive: Airport taxes. Tipping, gratuities & other personal expenses. Notes: Additional night in Bali might be required, depending on the return flight to the country of origin that originally booked. Ah yes, 5 days swanning around in private airconditioned cars, flying first class, staying in 5 * hotels! So whats that lot going to cost extra? a few tonnes more each? Not to mention the electricity used. 11,000 laptops and phones running for 2 weeks? Thats a few more tonnes. Food? How much has to be shipped in? Can Bali really feed that many? How about all the drink tha
GW aside, I have to agree wioth your general sentiments on the UN personnel... my brother recently returned from a mammoth cycle-tour all around Africa - North to South and East to West - and he came back spitting blood about them. All over the continent, he said, he was constantly being passed on the road by gleaming white Landrovers sporting UN flags with their white-shirted occupants zipping around from town to town in air-conditioned comfort (and the air-bubble of their perverted thinking) trying to make out that they are helping the poor Black Man... (not that they'd ever actually meet one, except to order a shoe-shine off of...) The UN should be disbanded, pure and simple. It was a nice idea at the outset, but it is a complete and utter failure. It is intellectually dishonest, and a waste of everyone's time, effort and money. Maybe one day it can be resurrected in a different form, when the memories of this one have faded into history. I know I'm not supposed to feed your GW obsession, but I can't help it, so here goes: I think you're wrong about GW. Little point arguing about it I know but just for the record, mark my words: in your life-time, you will see *huge* changes in the social and political life of this planet, all bought about by a changing world climate. And they won't be nice (because we haven't the political sophistication to deal with them) - and they will have been exaggerated by the fact that this planet has billions of people pourong out billions of tons of one form of sh*t or another into the environment, which it simply cannot accommodate any longer. We are fast approaching a tipping point, and once over the edge... god help us all. I'm not worried about the planet, which doesn't care if it's hot, cold or in-between - it's how we cope with the changes that's going to be nasty. Doesn't mean I support the green taxes and other "initiatives" of the "Green" lobby - far as I am concerned, we're too late: there is no way the peoples of this planet could ever unite enough to do anything even if they all wanted to, or agreed on a course of action, which they clearly don't. We're going to have to face it when it comes, and that's that. Might as well enjoy the relative peace while we still have it. It's coming, F_B, believe me. All these stats you post showing it isn't are no more than those a smoker could post up showing how 20 years of smoking haven't killed him. Some smokers get away with it and remain healthy all their long lives - but we only have this one planet, and I do believ
-
CataclysmicQuantums wrote:
This is insurance incase you realize what that means and decide to delete your post.
You are a warped person. What is it about posts relating to homosexuality that you find so fascinating you have to 'take out insurance' or, as you did with me, re-publicise it in the dellusion that others would find it as interesting as you do? If you want to experiment a little go out and do it. At least you will get it out of your system, or find a more satisfying way of life.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
GW aside, I have to agree wioth your general sentiments on the UN personnel... my brother recently returned from a mammoth cycle-tour all around Africa - North to South and East to West - and he came back spitting blood about them. All over the continent, he said, he was constantly being passed on the road by gleaming white Landrovers sporting UN flags with their white-shirted occupants zipping around from town to town in air-conditioned comfort (and the air-bubble of their perverted thinking) trying to make out that they are helping the poor Black Man... (not that they'd ever actually meet one, except to order a shoe-shine off of...) The UN should be disbanded, pure and simple. It was a nice idea at the outset, but it is a complete and utter failure. It is intellectually dishonest, and a waste of everyone's time, effort and money. Maybe one day it can be resurrected in a different form, when the memories of this one have faded into history. I know I'm not supposed to feed your GW obsession, but I can't help it, so here goes: I think you're wrong about GW. Little point arguing about it I know but just for the record, mark my words: in your life-time, you will see *huge* changes in the social and political life of this planet, all bought about by a changing world climate. And they won't be nice (because we haven't the political sophistication to deal with them) - and they will have been exaggerated by the fact that this planet has billions of people pourong out billions of tons of one form of sh*t or another into the environment, which it simply cannot accommodate any longer. We are fast approaching a tipping point, and once over the edge... god help us all. I'm not worried about the planet, which doesn't care if it's hot, cold or in-between - it's how we cope with the changes that's going to be nasty. Doesn't mean I support the green taxes and other "initiatives" of the "Green" lobby - far as I am concerned, we're too late: there is no way the peoples of this planet could ever unite enough to do anything even if they all wanted to, or agreed on a course of action, which they clearly don't. We're going to have to face it when it comes, and that's that. Might as well enjoy the relative peace while we still have it. It's coming, F_B, believe me. All these stats you post showing it isn't are no more than those a smoker could post up showing how 20 years of smoking haven't killed him. Some smokers get away with it and remain healthy all their long lives - but we only have this one planet, and I do believ
Fred_Smith wrote:
mark my words
Marked. In 20 years we can revisit this post and see just what has happened. But in the mean time take a look at this: Temperature measurements from two Greenland Ice Sheet boreholes were used to reconstruct the temperature history of the Greenland Ice Sheet over the past 50,000 years. What was learned The data revealed that temperatures on the Greenland Ice Sheet during the Last Glacial Maximum (approximately 25,000 years ago) were 23 ± 2 °C colder than at present. After the termination of the glacial period, temperatures increased steadily to a maximum of 2.5°C warmer than at present during the Climatic Optimum (4,000 to 7,000 years ago). The Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age were also documented in the record, with temperatures 1°C warmer and 0.5-0.7°C cooler than at present, respectively. [^] So in recent human history (bronze age) itwas 2.5 degrees warmer. Thats more then the IPCC predicts for the next century. And we, and the planet, lived through that period, even laying down the roots for todays civilisations: agriculture, religion. Look at stonehenge? You cant build that unless society is big, organised and cohesive. Mark my words. Absoloutely nothing is going to happen except increased crop yields and plant growth. Nothing happened before, and nothing will happen again.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
GW aside, I have to agree wioth your general sentiments on the UN personnel... my brother recently returned from a mammoth cycle-tour all around Africa - North to South and East to West - and he came back spitting blood about them. All over the continent, he said, he was constantly being passed on the road by gleaming white Landrovers sporting UN flags with their white-shirted occupants zipping around from town to town in air-conditioned comfort (and the air-bubble of their perverted thinking) trying to make out that they are helping the poor Black Man... (not that they'd ever actually meet one, except to order a shoe-shine off of...) The UN should be disbanded, pure and simple. It was a nice idea at the outset, but it is a complete and utter failure. It is intellectually dishonest, and a waste of everyone's time, effort and money. Maybe one day it can be resurrected in a different form, when the memories of this one have faded into history. I know I'm not supposed to feed your GW obsession, but I can't help it, so here goes: I think you're wrong about GW. Little point arguing about it I know but just for the record, mark my words: in your life-time, you will see *huge* changes in the social and political life of this planet, all bought about by a changing world climate. And they won't be nice (because we haven't the political sophistication to deal with them) - and they will have been exaggerated by the fact that this planet has billions of people pourong out billions of tons of one form of sh*t or another into the environment, which it simply cannot accommodate any longer. We are fast approaching a tipping point, and once over the edge... god help us all. I'm not worried about the planet, which doesn't care if it's hot, cold or in-between - it's how we cope with the changes that's going to be nasty. Doesn't mean I support the green taxes and other "initiatives" of the "Green" lobby - far as I am concerned, we're too late: there is no way the peoples of this planet could ever unite enough to do anything even if they all wanted to, or agreed on a course of action, which they clearly don't. We're going to have to face it when it comes, and that's that. Might as well enjoy the relative peace while we still have it. It's coming, F_B, believe me. All these stats you post showing it isn't are no more than those a smoker could post up showing how 20 years of smoking haven't killed him. Some smokers get away with it and remain healthy all their long lives - but we only have this one planet, and I do believ
Fred_Smith wrote:
The UN should be disbanded, pure and simple. It was a nice idea at the outset, but it is a complete and utter failure ... Maybe one day it can be resurrected in a different form
Replace/resurrected it with what? Who or what should assume the role of world policeman in its absence? What, in its absense, of humanitarian concerns? etc...
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
mark my words
Marked. In 20 years we can revisit this post and see just what has happened. But in the mean time take a look at this: Temperature measurements from two Greenland Ice Sheet boreholes were used to reconstruct the temperature history of the Greenland Ice Sheet over the past 50,000 years. What was learned The data revealed that temperatures on the Greenland Ice Sheet during the Last Glacial Maximum (approximately 25,000 years ago) were 23 ± 2 °C colder than at present. After the termination of the glacial period, temperatures increased steadily to a maximum of 2.5°C warmer than at present during the Climatic Optimum (4,000 to 7,000 years ago). The Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age were also documented in the record, with temperatures 1°C warmer and 0.5-0.7°C cooler than at present, respectively. [^] So in recent human history (bronze age) itwas 2.5 degrees warmer. Thats more then the IPCC predicts for the next century. And we, and the planet, lived through that period, even laying down the roots for todays civilisations: agriculture, religion. Look at stonehenge? You cant build that unless society is big, organised and cohesive. Mark my words. Absoloutely nothing is going to happen except increased crop yields and plant growth. Nothing happened before, and nothing will happen again.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
fat_boy wrote:
And we, and the planet, lived through that period
yes, we did, but for long periods the whole of northern Europe and what is now northern USA was uninhabitable (buried under ice)... just imagine the political / social consequences of humanity today trying to cope woth that sort of change... it isn't that the world will be uninhabtable per se, it;'s more about our ability to cope with the changes...
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Ah, my quarry - I have found you.
Looks like someone has a crush.
46 75 63 6B 20 79 6F 75 20 4B 79 6C 65 20 45 64 77 61 72 64 73 20 66 72 6F 6D 20 41 72 6B 61 6E 73 61 73 21 20 46 75 63 6B 20 79 6F 75 20 74 6F 20 68 65 6C 6C This is a coded message, if you decode it and you are offended, it is your own f****ing fault.
-
fat_boy wrote:
And we, and the planet, lived through that period
yes, we did, but for long periods the whole of northern Europe and what is now northern USA was uninhabitable (buried under ice)... just imagine the political / social consequences of humanity today trying to cope woth that sort of change... it isn't that the world will be uninhabtable per se, it;'s more about our ability to cope with the changes...
Fred_Smith wrote:
for long periods the whole of northern Europe and what is now northern USA was uninhabitable (buried under ice)...
Hang on, we are talking about global warming, not a new ice age. If the temp drops by 6 degrees (like the last ice age), yes, we are mightly fucked. Be then need to find ways to warm the planet up to avoid disaster, but thats a different argument.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
for long periods the whole of northern Europe and what is now northern USA was uninhabitable (buried under ice)...
Hang on, we are talking about global warming, not a new ice age. If the temp drops by 6 degrees (like the last ice age), yes, we are mightly fucked. Be then need to find ways to warm the planet up to avoid disaster, but thats a different argument.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
fat_boy wrote:
Hang on, we are talking about global warming, not a new ice age
Who knows? It may be warmer in some parts and colder in others; maybe one followed by the other - I'm talking about global climactic change. Our climate models are nowhere near accurate enough to make sensible predictions. You may even be right and it'll all balance out, but I think we are making such a big imprint on the planet that sooner rather than later we're going to find that our actions have consequences....
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
OK, so MAYBE I am a silly, loser kid sometimes (often),
Why do you say that?
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
but...can you blame me?
If you were yes, but you probably arent so no.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
But you shoulda known it wouldn't get rid of me.
Yes, you seem to have the persistence of fish sauce. ;)
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
fat_boy wrote:
Why do you say that?
Why? Oh, you know....example: I finally got a mobile phone, a fair while ago, and still nobody has my number, or I theirs. I have never even used it. I'm still too shy to talk to strangers face-to-face. I thought that I would be able to change the world for the greater good, but then I realised that the world doesn't want my help. I've had the same song stuck in my head for the past five days. I watched my computer defrag. Twice.
It may be a jewel of open-source, but Firefox is just a browser. It shows web pages. What the hell is wrong with us?!
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
The UN should be disbanded, pure and simple. It was a nice idea at the outset, but it is a complete and utter failure ... Maybe one day it can be resurrected in a different form
Replace/resurrected it with what? Who or what should assume the role of world policeman in its absence? What, in its absense, of humanitarian concerns? etc...
I really don't know... like I said, the *idea* is fine, but it just doesn't work in practice. As a "world policeman" it is pretty lame. I'm not sure it can ever work as that, because such a role requires it to have some real authority, and how can it when, for political reasons, each and every nation has to have equal representation? Equality and authority do not co-exist like that. I know the security council is supposed to assume some such role, but a) it's outdated and b) no-one takes any notice of it anyway. Groups like MSF and AI have dne as much for humanitarian concerns as the UN ever has. (Mind you, AI have lost the plot, IMHO, getting involved in too mnay wider issues - they should stick to, or return to, their original brief, whence they wuold be taklen more seriously. Such groups only succeed by being single-issue - this makes them less threatening to the regimes they are wokring in. In a sense, the UN, by being the absolute opposite of this (involving itself in everything) ends up having no power and very little influence. Countries like pre-war Iraq and Zimbabwe, for example, are not going to let the UN have any say at all in their affairs, are they?
-
fat_boy wrote:
Why do you say that?
Why? Oh, you know....example: I finally got a mobile phone, a fair while ago, and still nobody has my number, or I theirs. I have never even used it. I'm still too shy to talk to strangers face-to-face. I thought that I would be able to change the world for the greater good, but then I realised that the world doesn't want my help. I've had the same song stuck in my head for the past five days. I watched my computer defrag. Twice.
It may be a jewel of open-source, but Firefox is just a browser. It shows web pages. What the hell is wrong with us?!
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I finally got a mobile phone, a fair while ago, and still nobody has my number, or I theirs
Hmm, so either you dont have friends or they dont have mobiles. If the former go and and make some.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I'm still too shy to talk to strangers face-to-face.
That can take along time to overcome. Just remember, most people are just as shy and nice as you are. Many hide it with a tough exterior, but just smile, be open and people will start to open up to you a bit and you'll soon be chatting away.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I thought that I would be able to change the world for the greater good, but then I realised that the world doesn't want my help.
It took me till I was 25 before I realised I couldnt change the world so well done, you are ahead in the game.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I've had the same song stuck in my head for the past five days.
Wait till people start phoning you. It wil be your ring tone stuck in your head. :)
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I finally got a mobile phone, a fair while ago, and still nobody has my number, or I theirs
Hmm, so either you dont have friends or they dont have mobiles. If the former go and and make some.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I'm still too shy to talk to strangers face-to-face.
That can take along time to overcome. Just remember, most people are just as shy and nice as you are. Many hide it with a tough exterior, but just smile, be open and people will start to open up to you a bit and you'll soon be chatting away.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I thought that I would be able to change the world for the greater good, but then I realised that the world doesn't want my help.
It took me till I was 25 before I realised I couldnt change the world so well done, you are ahead in the game.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I've had the same song stuck in my head for the past five days.
Wait till people start phoning you. It wil be your ring tone stuck in your head. :)
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
fat_boy wrote:
Hmm, so either you dont have friends or they dont have mobiles. If the former go and and make some.
Yes and no. One good friend, but still, not someone who I would call, or even open up to really. Maybe it's just a boy thing?
fat_boy wrote:
That can take along time to overcome. Just remember, most people are just as shy and nice as you are. Many hide it with a tough exterior, but just smile, be open and people will start to open up to you a bit and you'll soon be chatting away.
You make it sound too easy. WAY too easy. But, my brother's girlfriend took the time with me, and now sometimes she tells me things she wouldn't even tell my brother, for one reason or another...she says I'm a good listener, and I think I am, a VERY good listener, so maybe there's hope for me yet. Nonjudgmental too - imagine my surprise when I found out that tons of my peers think that gays and prostitutes deserve to die! Didn't even make sense to me...
fat_boy wrote:
It took me till I was 25 before I realised I couldnt change the world so well done, you are ahead in the game.
You're congratulating me on losing faith in humanity?
fat_boy wrote:
Wait till people start phoning you. It wil be your ring tone stuck in your head.
Guess what my ringtone is. ;P
It may be a jewel of open-source, but Firefox is just a browser. It shows web pages. What the hell is wrong with us?!
-
fat_boy wrote:
Hmm, so either you dont have friends or they dont have mobiles. If the former go and and make some.
Yes and no. One good friend, but still, not someone who I would call, or even open up to really. Maybe it's just a boy thing?
fat_boy wrote:
That can take along time to overcome. Just remember, most people are just as shy and nice as you are. Many hide it with a tough exterior, but just smile, be open and people will start to open up to you a bit and you'll soon be chatting away.
You make it sound too easy. WAY too easy. But, my brother's girlfriend took the time with me, and now sometimes she tells me things she wouldn't even tell my brother, for one reason or another...she says I'm a good listener, and I think I am, a VERY good listener, so maybe there's hope for me yet. Nonjudgmental too - imagine my surprise when I found out that tons of my peers think that gays and prostitutes deserve to die! Didn't even make sense to me...
fat_boy wrote:
It took me till I was 25 before I realised I couldnt change the world so well done, you are ahead in the game.
You're congratulating me on losing faith in humanity?
fat_boy wrote:
Wait till people start phoning you. It wil be your ring tone stuck in your head.
Guess what my ringtone is. ;P
It may be a jewel of open-source, but Firefox is just a browser. It shows web pages. What the hell is wrong with us?!
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Maybe it's just a boy thing
It is difficult. Boys have to be carefull because they are in a competetive environment. They want friends, but they want to succeedin the heirachy too. Weaknesses are often exposed and picked on, eveb friends turn on friendsif they feel the social pressure to do so. This gets a lot easier after about 18 or so. You just care less and less about what your peers think of you and do your own thing. You will be able then to open up and discuss attitudes, feelsing and so on at much greater depth than you can at 13. It could be you are just more mature than your peers and actually enjoy the company of older people because you can open up a little more.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
You make it sound too easy.
In the end it is. People are easy. You will see one day. In the mean time just be yourself, dont be shy about your character. If any one has a problem then its their problem, not yours.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
You're congratulating me on losing faith in humanity?
No, that you know you arent going to change the world.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Guess what my ringtone is.
Hansen by any chance?
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Maybe it's just a boy thing
It is difficult. Boys have to be carefull because they are in a competetive environment. They want friends, but they want to succeedin the heirachy too. Weaknesses are often exposed and picked on, eveb friends turn on friendsif they feel the social pressure to do so. This gets a lot easier after about 18 or so. You just care less and less about what your peers think of you and do your own thing. You will be able then to open up and discuss attitudes, feelsing and so on at much greater depth than you can at 13. It could be you are just more mature than your peers and actually enjoy the company of older people because you can open up a little more.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
You make it sound too easy.
In the end it is. People are easy. You will see one day. In the mean time just be yourself, dont be shy about your character. If any one has a problem then its their problem, not yours.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
You're congratulating me on losing faith in humanity?
No, that you know you arent going to change the world.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Guess what my ringtone is.
Hansen by any chance?
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
fat_boy wrote:
Boys have to be carefull because they are in a competetive environment. They want friends, but they want to succeedin the heirachy too. Weaknesses are often exposed and picked on, eveb friends turn on friendsif they feel the social pressure to do so.
Stupid society...:mad:
fat_boy wrote:
It could be you are just more mature than your peers and actually enjoy the company of older people because you can open up a little more.
I've been told that several times before. Warned that before I started high school. It could be true, I dunno. I don't think the human mind is properly equipped to look at itself objectively.
fat_boy wrote:
In the mean time just be yourself, dont be shy about your character. If any one has a problem then its their problem, not yours.
Ah, I guess having a shy character kinda ruins it, huh. :) It may be their problem but very occasionally they make me feel otherwise. I guess it's easy to feel different when you so obviously are.
fat_boy wrote:
Hansen by any chance?
I'd say that there's a very good chance of that. :cool: Well....nighty night. Nighttimes just...affect me somehow. Badly. :rose:
It may be a jewel of open-source, but Firefox is just a browser. It shows web pages. What the hell is wrong with us?!
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
The UN should be disbanded, pure and simple. It was a nice idea at the outset, but it is a complete and utter failure ... Maybe one day it can be resurrected in a different form
Replace/resurrected it with what? Who or what should assume the role of world policeman in its absence? What, in its absense, of humanitarian concerns? etc...
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
o or what should assume the role of world policeman in its absence?
No one is doing the job even its presence. It took the UN ages to get off its but with Bosnia. The Kosovo interventio was not UN sanctioned till after NATO declared war on Serbia. It is useless. Usless and expensive.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
So I just contaced John Hay, the UN FCC conference spokes person and asked him some questions: 1) 10,000 yes really, 10,000 people are going to attend the conference in Bali for 2 weeks. And thats not including the press, who no doubt will number at least 1,000. 2) He wasnt forthcoming regarding the Carbon Footprint of the conference, I expect it hasnt even beem calculated, but assume each person, probably flying business class (on your tax money), has a total weight of around around 100 kg, then thats 1,100,000 kgs of 'airfright' alone created by the confernce. Whats the carbon footprint of that lot for a 12 hour flight? So using Flight Emissions Calculator[^] one can calculate that for a flight from Denmark to Indonesia each person costs 2.5 tonnes of CO2. Thats 27,500 tonnes of CO2 just for the flights say. But theres more! Check out this seductively glossy production: climate change conference 2OO7[^] and particularly page 18. (Thats just after the 5* hotel list (alsoo on your tax money), the 'Optional Tours' section. Yes, you can spend 6 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours, or 4 days driving and flying around the wonderful islands of indonesia lapping up the cultural beauty and atmosphere (before it is all wiped out ny Global Warming that is). The general conditions make interesting reading: Inclusive in Tour Price: Tour and transfers as mentioned in the itinerary with private airconditioned vehicle. English speaking guide. Entrance fee, donation fee and luggage handling. Accommodation at Hotel. Exclusive: Airport taxes. Tipping, gratuities & other personal expenses. Notes: Additional night in Bali might be required, depending on the return flight to the country of origin that originally booked. Ah yes, 5 days swanning around in private airconditioned cars, flying first class, staying in 5 * hotels! So whats that lot going to cost extra? a few tonnes more each? Not to mention the electricity used. 11,000 laptops and phones running for 2 weeks? Thats a few more tonnes. Food? How much has to be shipped in? Can Bali really feed that many? How about all the drink tha
Priceless! My 5 should offset a couple of those unwarranted 1s.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
-
So I just contaced John Hay, the UN FCC conference spokes person and asked him some questions: 1) 10,000 yes really, 10,000 people are going to attend the conference in Bali for 2 weeks. And thats not including the press, who no doubt will number at least 1,000. 2) He wasnt forthcoming regarding the Carbon Footprint of the conference, I expect it hasnt even beem calculated, but assume each person, probably flying business class (on your tax money), has a total weight of around around 100 kg, then thats 1,100,000 kgs of 'airfright' alone created by the confernce. Whats the carbon footprint of that lot for a 12 hour flight? So using Flight Emissions Calculator[^] one can calculate that for a flight from Denmark to Indonesia each person costs 2.5 tonnes of CO2. Thats 27,500 tonnes of CO2 just for the flights say. But theres more! Check out this seductively glossy production: climate change conference 2OO7[^] and particularly page 18. (Thats just after the 5* hotel list (alsoo on your tax money), the 'Optional Tours' section. Yes, you can spend 6 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours, or 4 days driving and flying around the wonderful islands of indonesia lapping up the cultural beauty and atmosphere (before it is all wiped out ny Global Warming that is). The general conditions make interesting reading: Inclusive in Tour Price: Tour and transfers as mentioned in the itinerary with private airconditioned vehicle. English speaking guide. Entrance fee, donation fee and luggage handling. Accommodation at Hotel. Exclusive: Airport taxes. Tipping, gratuities & other personal expenses. Notes: Additional night in Bali might be required, depending on the return flight to the country of origin that originally booked. Ah yes, 5 days swanning around in private airconditioned cars, flying first class, staying in 5 * hotels! So whats that lot going to cost extra? a few tonnes more each? Not to mention the electricity used. 11,000 laptops and phones running for 2 weeks? Thats a few more tonnes. Food? How much has to be shipped in? Can Bali really feed that many? How about all the drink tha
What utter popycock! These experts are the servants of huminty and carry the future of the planet in their hands! They deserve a little R and R while working to save our future! YOUR future! Your CHILDRENS future! Honestly, some people really dont deserve to call themselves members of the human race!
God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; the courage to change the things I can; and the wisdom to know the difference
-
What utter popycock! These experts are the servants of huminty and carry the future of the planet in their hands! They deserve a little R and R while working to save our future! YOUR future! Your CHILDRENS future! Honestly, some people really dont deserve to call themselves members of the human race!
God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; the courage to change the things I can; and the wisdom to know the difference
It's hypocrisy. And looks absolutely ridiculous to those of us who don't believe it's the dire situation that proponents of AGW like to claim. Especially when they hang all the blame on one tiny variable of a vastly complex system that nobody completely understands.
d king wrote:
Honestly, some people really dont deserve to call themselves members of the human race!
Anybody with the right DNA can rightfully claim to be part of the human race.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.