Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. The US as a banana republic

The US as a banana republic

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcom
90 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Stan Shannon

    Doesn't the obvious fact that we are going to have an election in another year and that we have a congress that is fully functional and constitutionally empowered to investigate the president's activities all they like, make you and Andrew feel kind of stupid at comparing us to a banana republic? Hell, if you and Andrew want leadership that gives full constitutional rights to foreign terrorist for the first time in our history, than vote for them. I'll vote for the guy who wants to shove red hot spikes through their fucking Islamic eyes. Democracy in action! Besides, if roughing up a few forgien terrorsits makes us a banana republic, what did droppoing nuclear bombs on Japanese mothers making breakfast for their children makes us?

    The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Le centriste
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Stan Shannon wrote:

    what did droppoing nuclear bombs on Japanese mothers making breakfast for their children makes us?

    The only nation to have used WMD's against another nation.

    ----- You seem eager to impose your preference of preventing others from imposing their preferences on others. -- Red Stateler, Master of Circular Reasoning and other fallacies If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      Doesn't the obvious fact that we are going to have an election in another year and that we have a congress that is fully functional and constitutionally empowered to investigate the president's activities all they like, make you and Andrew feel kind of stupid at comparing us to a banana republic? Hell, if you and Andrew want leadership that gives full constitutional rights to foreign terrorist for the first time in our history, than vote for them. I'll vote for the guy who wants to shove red hot spikes through their fucking Islamic eyes. Democracy in action! Besides, if roughing up a few forgien terrorsits makes us a banana republic, what did droppoing nuclear bombs on Japanese mothers making breakfast for their children makes us?

      The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

      K Offline
      K Offline
      KaRl
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      what did droppoing nuclear bombs on Japanese mothers making breakfast for their children makes us?

      A terrorist nation part of the Axis of Evil?


      When they kick at your front door How you gonna come? With your hands on your head Or on the trigger of your gun?

      Fold with us! ¤ flickr

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K KaRl

        Stan Shannon wrote:

        what did droppoing nuclear bombs on Japanese mothers making breakfast for their children makes us?

        A terrorist nation part of the Axis of Evil?


        When they kick at your front door How you gonna come? With your hands on your head Or on the trigger of your gun?

        Fold with us! ¤ flickr

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stan Shannon
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        K(arl) wrote:

        A terrorist nation part of the Axis of Evil?

        Absolutely. If we are a banana republic for torturing terrorists, than we were terrorist when we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. You simply cannot have it both ways. If doing evil things in the cause of self defense is wrong now, than it was wrong then.

        The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Le centriste

          Stan Shannon wrote:

          what did droppoing nuclear bombs on Japanese mothers making breakfast for their children makes us?

          The only nation to have used WMD's against another nation.

          ----- You seem eager to impose your preference of preventing others from imposing their preferences on others. -- Red Stateler, Master of Circular Reasoning and other fallacies If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

          B Offline
          B Offline
          BoneSoft
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          First off you're wrong. Replace "WMD's" with "atomic weapons" and you're correct. But... Ask virtually any Japanese about that and they'll tell you that it was justified and it almost certainly saved lives. They'll tell you that the Japanese government would not have stopped until every man woman and child had died fighting. They'll tell you it was probably the only way to end the war. It was horrible and disgusting, but circumstances are important to consider. I won't say it was the best decision, I wouldn't want to have to make it, but it may have been the only recourse, and may have even been the right move. And though far removed, I may have been touched by it more than most critics I've met that like to throw that around. My mother in law died as a result of the Nagasaki bomb. She was stuffed into a stone oven shortly before the blast, and died of a rare cancer years later.


          Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

          I O 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            Doesn't the obvious fact that we are going to have an election in another year and that we have a congress that is fully functional and constitutionally empowered to investigate the president's activities all they like, make you and Andrew feel kind of stupid at comparing us to a banana republic? Hell, if you and Andrew want leadership that gives full constitutional rights to foreign terrorist for the first time in our history, than vote for them. I'll vote for the guy who wants to shove red hot spikes through their fucking Islamic eyes. Democracy in action! Besides, if roughing up a few forgien terrorsits makes us a banana republic, what did droppoing nuclear bombs on Japanese mothers making breakfast for their children makes us?

            The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

            O Offline
            O Offline
            oilFactotum
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            Doesn't the obvious fact...

            Doesn't the obvious fact that 'The US as a banana republic' is a simile make you feel stupid for pointing out that is is not exact. Wow, amazing!

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            Besides, if roughing up a few forgien terrorsits makes us a banana republic

            No, Guess you didn't actually do any reading: "What defines such a republic? How about an executive that ignores the rule of law, commits war-crimes and then destroys the actual evidence?"

            S B 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • O oilFactotum

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              Doesn't the obvious fact...

              Doesn't the obvious fact that 'The US as a banana republic' is a simile make you feel stupid for pointing out that is is not exact. Wow, amazing!

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              Besides, if roughing up a few forgien terrorsits makes us a banana republic

              No, Guess you didn't actually do any reading: "What defines such a republic? How about an executive that ignores the rule of law, commits war-crimes and then destroys the actual evidence?"

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              oilFactotum wrote:

              What defines such a republic? How about an executive that ignores the rule of law, commits war-crimes and then destroys the actual evidence?"

              And who will peacefully step down in another year and be subject to any investigations congress wishes to initiate. So your little 'simile' is as retarded as everything else you and Andrew typically yap about. If all you lefties want to impeach a president for defending the nation than you should grow some testicles and do it.

              The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

              O I 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                oilFactotum wrote:

                What defines such a republic? How about an executive that ignores the rule of law, commits war-crimes and then destroys the actual evidence?"

                And who will peacefully step down in another year and be subject to any investigations congress wishes to initiate. So your little 'simile' is as retarded as everything else you and Andrew typically yap about. If all you lefties want to impeach a president for defending the nation than you should grow some testicles and do it.

                The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                O Offline
                O Offline
                oilFactotum
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                And who will peacefully step down in another year

                Doesn't excuse him for an instant. I'm not suprised that you somehow think it does.

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                defending the nation

                Unfortunately that is exactly what he is not doing.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O oilFactotum

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  And who will peacefully step down in another year

                  Doesn't excuse him for an instant. I'm not suprised that you somehow think it does.

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  defending the nation

                  Unfortunately that is exactly what he is not doing.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  oilFactotum wrote:

                  Doesn't excuse him for an instant. I'm not suprised that you somehow think it does.

                  If he isn't impeached, he doesn't need an excuse.

                  oilFactotum wrote:

                  Unfortunately that is exactly what he is not doing.

                  Fortunantely, no one elected you or Andrew to have a say in defining what is necessary for defense.

                  The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • O oilFactotum

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    Doesn't the obvious fact...

                    Doesn't the obvious fact that 'The US as a banana republic' is a simile make you feel stupid for pointing out that is is not exact. Wow, amazing!

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    Besides, if roughing up a few forgien terrorsits makes us a banana republic

                    No, Guess you didn't actually do any reading: "What defines such a republic? How about an executive that ignores the rule of law, commits war-crimes and then destroys the actual evidence?"

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    BoneSoft
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    I guess the message to take home from that 'article' is that if you don't want trouble, don't take a shoe bomb onto an international flight full of innocent people.


                    Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O oilFactotum

                      http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/12/this-is-a-banan.html[^] "We live in a country where the government can detain indefinitely, torture in secret, and then secretly destroy the tapes of torture sessions to protect its own staff"

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      BoneSoft
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      The one case that really talks about is Padilla. And his legal team seems to think that "sensory deprivation, sleep deprivation & enforced stress positions" constitutes torture. And if that can be considered torture, I should be able to sue the bank and the DMV for making me stand in line.


                      Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

                      I O 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        oilFactotum wrote:

                        What defines such a republic? How about an executive that ignores the rule of law, commits war-crimes and then destroys the actual evidence?"

                        And who will peacefully step down in another year and be subject to any investigations congress wishes to initiate. So your little 'simile' is as retarded as everything else you and Andrew typically yap about. If all you lefties want to impeach a president for defending the nation than you should grow some testicles and do it.

                        The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                        I Offline
                        I Offline
                        IamChrisMcCall
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        We are doing it, we're starting with Cheney. Be careful what you wish for. And stop insinuating that being a liberal indicates some lack of manliness, it's ridiculous.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B BoneSoft

                          The one case that really talks about is Padilla. And his legal team seems to think that "sensory deprivation, sleep deprivation & enforced stress positions" constitutes torture. And if that can be considered torture, I should be able to sue the bank and the DMV for making me stand in line.


                          Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

                          I Offline
                          I Offline
                          IamChrisMcCall
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          BoneSoft wrote:

                          And his legal team seems to think that "sensory deprivation, sleep deprivation & enforced stress positions" constitutes torture.

                          Sensory or sleep deprivation is torture. So are enforced stress positions. You know this, but you pretend it's no big deal to ease your conscience. If those techniques were not torture, why would they be used to extract information? Making someone slightly uncomfortable is not going to accomplish anything and you know that, too. But, sure, it's like being at the DMV. Whatever helps you get through the day as a torturer by proxy. Be careful, though, torture breaks down the torturer as surely as it breaks down the victim.

                          B 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • B BoneSoft

                            The one case that really talks about is Padilla. And his legal team seems to think that "sensory deprivation, sleep deprivation & enforced stress positions" constitutes torture. And if that can be considered torture, I should be able to sue the bank and the DMV for making me stand in line.


                            Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

                            O Offline
                            O Offline
                            oilFactotum
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            BoneSoft wrote:

                            seems to think that "sensory deprivation, sleep deprivation & enforced stress positions" constitutes torture.

                            They don't just 'seem to think it'. They are crimes under US law.

                            BoneSoft wrote:

                            I should be able to sue the bank and the DMV for making me stand in line.

                            X| I honestly hope you don't really believe that.

                            B 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Stan Shannon

                              oilFactotum wrote:

                              Doesn't excuse him for an instant. I'm not suprised that you somehow think it does.

                              If he isn't impeached, he doesn't need an excuse.

                              oilFactotum wrote:

                              Unfortunately that is exactly what he is not doing.

                              Fortunantely, no one elected you or Andrew to have a say in defining what is necessary for defense.

                              The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                              O Offline
                              O Offline
                              oilFactotum
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              Stan Shannon wrote:

                              he doesn't need an excuse.

                              He has no excuse. He broke US law, he did it in secret and destroyed the evidence.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B BoneSoft

                                First off you're wrong. Replace "WMD's" with "atomic weapons" and you're correct. But... Ask virtually any Japanese about that and they'll tell you that it was justified and it almost certainly saved lives. They'll tell you that the Japanese government would not have stopped until every man woman and child had died fighting. They'll tell you it was probably the only way to end the war. It was horrible and disgusting, but circumstances are important to consider. I won't say it was the best decision, I wouldn't want to have to make it, but it may have been the only recourse, and may have even been the right move. And though far removed, I may have been touched by it more than most critics I've met that like to throw that around. My mother in law died as a result of the Nagasaki bomb. She was stuffed into a stone oven shortly before the blast, and died of a rare cancer years later.


                                Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

                                I Offline
                                I Offline
                                IamChrisMcCall
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                BoneSoft wrote:

                                Ask virtually any Japanese about that and they'll tell you that it was justified and it almost certainly saved lives.

                                You've got to be kidding me. Saved lives, maybe, but we dropped those bombs on civilian targets. The nation of Japan has been in a state of cultural mourning for the victims of the attack ever since it happened.

                                C S B M 5 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • B BoneSoft

                                  First off you're wrong. Replace "WMD's" with "atomic weapons" and you're correct. But... Ask virtually any Japanese about that and they'll tell you that it was justified and it almost certainly saved lives. They'll tell you that the Japanese government would not have stopped until every man woman and child had died fighting. They'll tell you it was probably the only way to end the war. It was horrible and disgusting, but circumstances are important to consider. I won't say it was the best decision, I wouldn't want to have to make it, but it may have been the only recourse, and may have even been the right move. And though far removed, I may have been touched by it more than most critics I've met that like to throw that around. My mother in law died as a result of the Nagasaki bomb. She was stuffed into a stone oven shortly before the blast, and died of a rare cancer years later.


                                  Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  oilFactotum
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  BoneSoft wrote:

                                  First off you're wrong. Replace "WMD's" with "atomic weapons" and you're correct.

                                  I'm curious about your meaning. If atomic weapons are not WMD's then nothing is.

                                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I IamChrisMcCall

                                    BoneSoft wrote:

                                    Ask virtually any Japanese about that and they'll tell you that it was justified and it almost certainly saved lives.

                                    You've got to be kidding me. Saved lives, maybe, but we dropped those bombs on civilian targets. The nation of Japan has been in a state of cultural mourning for the victims of the attack ever since it happened.

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    CataclysmicQuantum
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    IamChrisMcCall wrote:

                                    we dropped those bombs on civilian targets

                                    They are part of the war machine, they are the foundation of it.

                                    Word, write letters and sh*t yo.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • I IamChrisMcCall

                                      We are doing it, we're starting with Cheney. Be careful what you wish for. And stop insinuating that being a liberal indicates some lack of manliness, it's ridiculous.

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Stan Shannon
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      Being all talk and no walk is typically considered a lack of manliness. Go ahead and impeach them for defending the nation, I have nothing to lose from that. If they are guilty they should be impeached, if they are not it will destroy the democrat party. Either way, I win.

                                      The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                                      A I 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • O oilFactotum

                                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                                        he doesn't need an excuse.

                                        He has no excuse. He broke US law, he did it in secret and destroyed the evidence.

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Stan Shannon
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        So impeach him. Whats the problem?

                                        The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • I IamChrisMcCall

                                          BoneSoft wrote:

                                          Ask virtually any Japanese about that and they'll tell you that it was justified and it almost certainly saved lives.

                                          You've got to be kidding me. Saved lives, maybe, but we dropped those bombs on civilian targets. The nation of Japan has been in a state of cultural mourning for the victims of the attack ever since it happened.

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Stan Shannon
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          So FDR and Truman were at least as evil as Bush?

                                          The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups