Jesus's favorite candidate
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-BFEhkIujA[^] He would make the perfect president, with his clear understanding of the both the Bible and of the theory of evolution (which states the the human race evolved entirely by "accident"), and with his His medieval views on marriage[^].
modified on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:22:28 PM
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-BFEhkIujA[^] He would make the perfect president, with his clear understanding of the both the Bible and of the theory of evolution (which states the the human race evolved entirely by "accident"), and with his His medieval views on marriage[^].
modified on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:22:28 PM
Unelectable. Any democrat running would beat him. (well, maybe not Kucinich...)
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-BFEhkIujA[^] He would make the perfect president, with his clear understanding of the both the Bible and of the theory of evolution (which states the the human race evolved entirely by "accident"), and with his His medieval views on marriage[^].
modified on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:22:28 PM
That was an excellent answer. I'm actually pretty damn sure that more Americans are comfortable with a traditional Christian definition of marriage than they are with one derived in some radical San Francisco bath house.
The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-BFEhkIujA[^] He would make the perfect president, with his clear understanding of the both the Bible and of the theory of evolution (which states the the human race evolved entirely by "accident"), and with his His medieval views on marriage[^].
modified on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:22:28 PM
Are you old enough to vote in 2008?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
Are you old enough to vote in 2008?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Yes. I will be 18 in 2008.
-
Yes. I will be 18 in 2008.
If you are eligible to vote in the 2008 presidential election, are you then automatically eligible to vote in a primary election, should you not have turned 18 by then?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
If you are eligible to vote in the 2008 presidential election, are you then automatically eligible to vote in a primary election, should you not have turned 18 by then?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
I don't know, but probably not. I think you need to be registered to vote in the primaries, and to register to vote, you need to be 18.
-
That was an excellent answer. I'm actually pretty damn sure that more Americans are comfortable with a traditional Christian definition of marriage than they are with one derived in some radical San Francisco bath house.
The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.
The question is not whether to forbid christians to marry the way they like, or how they view their own marriage. The question is whether or not narrow minded bigots should be allowed to dictate the lives of others. The idea of denying consenting grown ups to marry, based solely on their gender, reeks of fascism. It's amazing that such shitty thinking is still widespread in the so called "civilized world".
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-BFEhkIujA[^] He would make the perfect president, with his clear understanding of the both the Bible and of the theory of evolution (which states the the human race evolved entirely by "accident"), and with his His medieval views on marriage[^].
modified on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:22:28 PM
Great answer. I might just vote for him. Thanks for pointing me to this. On a related note, this guy is endorsed by the legend himself[^]. ;)
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: The Story of the Spoiled Child The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango
-
If you are eligible to vote in the 2008 presidential election, are you then automatically eligible to vote in a primary election, should you not have turned 18 by then?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
as long as you are 18 and registered, you can vote in any applicable election, even if you were registered the day before...
[Insert Witty Sig Here]
-
Great answer. I might just vote for him. Thanks for pointing me to this. On a related note, this guy is endorsed by the legend himself[^]. ;)
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: The Story of the Spoiled Child The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango
Yeah he sounds like the perfect candidate for you, seeing how he is committed to serving Israel's interests[^], instead of adhering to the founding fathers' policy of noninvolvement in "entangling alliances".
-
The question is not whether to forbid christians to marry the way they like, or how they view their own marriage. The question is whether or not narrow minded bigots should be allowed to dictate the lives of others. The idea of denying consenting grown ups to marry, based solely on their gender, reeks of fascism. It's amazing that such shitty thinking is still widespread in the so called "civilized world".
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
whether or not narrow minded bigots should be allowed to dictate the lives of others
That's kinda up to the voter isn't it.
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
The idea of denying consenting grown ups to marry, based solely on their gender, reeks of fascism
If the government was saying that you can no longer legally hump guys, that would be dictating lives in a fascist manner. Saying you can't have a piece of paper that says you're married to another guy doesn't really compare.
Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.
-
The question is not whether to forbid christians to marry the way they like, or how they view their own marriage. The question is whether or not narrow minded bigots should be allowed to dictate the lives of others. The idea of denying consenting grown ups to marry, based solely on their gender, reeks of fascism. It's amazing that such shitty thinking is still widespread in the so called "civilized world".
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
The question is whether or not narrow minded bigots should be allowed to dictate the lives of others.
But how can you possibly avoid that? I mean, how do you even define 'narrow minded bigotry' without actually being a narrow minded bigot?
The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.
-
Yeah he sounds like the perfect candidate for you, seeing how he is committed to serving Israel's interests[^], instead of adhering to the founding fathers' policy of noninvolvement in "entangling alliances".
Demon Possessed wrote:
instead of adhering to the founding fathers' policy of noninvolvement in "entangling alliances".
I'm actually pretty sure that WWI and WWII sort of blew that principle out of the water. Its kind of difficult to avoid entangling alliances when the world would otherwise be controlled by people as politically incompetnet as the Europeans turned out to be. Now, if we could just get back to the original interpretation of the 4th amendment, and get rid of the 14th, that would be some progress the founders would be happy with!
The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.
-
Yeah he sounds like the perfect candidate for you, seeing how he is committed to serving Israel's interests[^], instead of adhering to the founding fathers' policy of noninvolvement in "entangling alliances".
Better to serve friends than Islamic theocracies, I'd say.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: The Story of the Spoiled Child The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango
-
Better to serve friends than Islamic theocracies, I'd say.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: The Story of the Spoiled Child The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango
And in other news, Americans' attitude to report [about nuclear weapons in Iran] reminiscent of Auschwitz[^]. :rolleyes:
-
The question is not whether to forbid christians to marry the way they like, or how they view their own marriage. The question is whether or not narrow minded bigots should be allowed to dictate the lives of others. The idea of denying consenting grown ups to marry, based solely on their gender, reeks of fascism. It's amazing that such shitty thinking is still widespread in the so called "civilized world".
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
The idea of denying consenting grown ups to marry, based solely on their gender, reeks of fascism. It's amazing that such shitty thinking is still widespread in the so called "civilized world".
Oh please, why the hell do two people of the same sex need to marry? Why not let 3 people get married and call it a Tri-Marriage? Marriage is the foundation for starting a family, not to get tax breaks and shit with your sex buddy. :mad:
Word, write letters and sh*t yo. It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird. Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings. The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do. Everyone needs believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-BFEhkIujA[^] He would make the perfect president, with his clear understanding of the both the Bible and of the theory of evolution (which states the the human race evolved entirely by "accident"), and with his His medieval views on marriage[^].
modified on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:22:28 PM
Sounds like a reasonable and honest man.
Word, write letters and sh*t yo. It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird. Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings. The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do. Everyone needs believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer.
-
Sounds like a reasonable and honest man.
Word, write letters and sh*t yo. It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird. Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings. The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do. Everyone needs believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer.
Have you ever looked up the word "reason"?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
The idea of denying consenting grown ups to marry, based solely on their gender, reeks of fascism. It's amazing that such shitty thinking is still widespread in the so called "civilized world".
Oh please, why the hell do two people of the same sex need to marry? Why not let 3 people get married and call it a Tri-Marriage? Marriage is the foundation for starting a family, not to get tax breaks and shit with your sex buddy. :mad:
Word, write letters and sh*t yo. It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird. Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings. The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do. Everyone needs believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer.
CataclysmicQuantum wrote:
Oh please, why the hell do two people of the same sex need to marry?
Don't trouble yourself, marriage is something you'll never need to worry about. :rolleyes:
To introduce faith christianity must destroy reason, to introduce salvation it must destroy happiness.