Subtle VB 2008 Compiler Bug
-
Ok I see that now but if this is limited to VB why wouldn't they spell that out very clearly in the list of products effected?
led mike wrote:
why wouldn't they spell that out very clearly in the list of products effected?
They're just listing all that lot because the default install will install all the languages. But I agree they should emphasise that it's a VB-specific issue.
Kevin
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
am Not anti VB, some of my best friends have VB,
Pah, that's what all languageists say. :)
-- Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit! Buzzwords!
A friend of mine is a VB user and wants to know where he can get help. ;) There is no VBists anonymous in his town.
You always pass failure on the way to success.
-
I know Rube Goldberg[^] is rolling on the bottom of his casket and laughing his ass off. :)
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]
Chris Meech wrote:
I know Rube Goldberg[^] is rolling on the bottom of his casket and laughing his ass off.
I'm pretty sure he has an anti-rolling mechanism built into his casket.
-
led mike wrote:
why wouldn't they spell that out very clearly in the list of products effected?
They're just listing all that lot because the default install will install all the languages. But I agree they should emphasise that it's a VB-specific issue.
Kevin
-
but now in vb missing lines of code IS a subtle bug no? and you have to wonder how many vb programmers would notice anyways :rolleyes:
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
-
I don't think my question was clear. I don't understand how you are concluding from that article that the problem is restricted to VB. It may be the case but that article does not clearly state that.
Well, I cheated. :) I found that link from another post titled "VB Bug" or something. But also they don't mention C# Express 2008 in the list but they do mention VB Express.
Kevin
-
I don't think my question was clear. I don't understand how you are concluding from that article that the problem is restricted to VB. It may be the case but that article does not clearly state that.
Here are the source links: How to Sidestep a Visual Basic Compiler Bug in RTM[^] Complex VB Compiler Bug Results in Lines of Code Being Skipped[^]
Kevin
-
Here are the source links: How to Sidestep a Visual Basic Compiler Bug in RTM[^] Complex VB Compiler Bug Results in Lines of Code Being Skipped[^]
Kevin
-
but now in vb missing lines of code IS a subtle bug no? and you have to wonder how many vb programmers would notice anyways :rolleyes:
"mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"
depends what disappears.
On Error Goto Nextwould probably reveal its disappearance very quickly. :doh:Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop. -- Matthew Faithfull
-
A friend of mine is a VB user and wants to know where he can get help. ;) There is no VBists anonymous in his town.
You always pass failure on the way to success.
GuyThiebaut wrote:
A friend of mine is a VB user and wants to know where he can get help.
There's always an exorcist.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
GuyThiebaut wrote:
A friend of mine is a VB user and wants to know where he can get help.
There's always an exorcist.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
:laugh: I don't know if I could stand that green pea soup being all over the walls.
You always pass failure on the way to success.
-
I know the B stands for BASIC, but the V puzzles me? Very? Vacuously? Vicariously? another v-word even longer than the last with a Question Mark after it?
------------------------------------ I try to appear cooler, by calling him Euler.
V is for Very :)
xacc.ide
IronScheme a R5RS/R6RS-compliant Scheme on the DLR
The rule of three: "The first time you notice something that might repeat, don't generalize it. The second time the situation occurs, develop in a similar fashion -- possibly even copy/paste -- but don't generalize yet. On the third time, look to generalize the approach."