Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. .NET (Core and Framework)
  4. 3.5 to 3.0 Conversion

3.5 to 3.0 Conversion

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved .NET (Core and Framework)
csharpdotnettutorialquestion
8 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    ss mmm
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    How to open an application in 3.0 framework? The app is built on VS2008, .net Framework 3.5 platform and now I need to convert it to VS2008 3.0 Framework. How to do that?

    Thanks

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S ss mmm

      How to open an application in 3.0 framework? The app is built on VS2008, .net Framework 3.5 platform and now I need to convert it to VS2008 3.0 Framework. How to do that?

      Thanks

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Pete OHanlon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      If you're using .NET 3.5 features, then you can't. If you don't use any of the newer features (such as Linq) then you can change it by selecting the project properties and change the Target framework. Do a recompile and you're good to go.

      Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

      My blog | My articles

      S E 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P Pete OHanlon

        If you're using .NET 3.5 features, then you can't. If you don't use any of the newer features (such as Linq) then you can change it by selecting the project properties and change the Target framework. Do a recompile and you're good to go.

        Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

        My blog | My articles

        S Offline
        S Offline
        ss mmm
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thanks

        Thanks

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Pete OHanlon

          If you're using .NET 3.5 features, then you can't. If you don't use any of the newer features (such as Linq) then you can change it by selecting the project properties and change the Target framework. Do a recompile and you're good to go.

          Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

          My blog | My articles

          E Offline
          E Offline
          Ed Poore
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I thought that you could use LINQ on 3.0?  But you'd have to install that extension set of things for VS2005.

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Ed Poore

            I thought that you could use LINQ on 3.0?  But you'd have to install that extension set of things for VS2005.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Pete OHanlon
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            That's true, but I didn't want to go down to that level of detail.

            Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

            My blog | My articles

            E 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Pete OHanlon

              That's true, but I didn't want to go down to that level of detail.

              Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

              My blog | My articles

              E Offline
              E Offline
              Ed Poore
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

              That's true, but I didn't want to go down to that level of detail.

              That's unlike you :rolleyes:

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Ed Poore

                Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

                That's true, but I didn't want to go down to that level of detail.

                That's unlike you :rolleyes:

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Pete OHanlon
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Ed.Poore wrote:

                That's unlike you

                It's all part of the new user friendly, touchy freely me.

                Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                My blog | My articles

                E 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Pete OHanlon

                  Ed.Poore wrote:

                  That's unlike you

                  It's all part of the new user friendly, touchy freely me.

                  Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                  My blog | My articles

                  E Offline
                  E Offline
                  Ed Poore
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  You want the use Macs too much :rolleyes:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups