Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Recursion

Recursion

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
16 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Maximilien

    Preyatham wrote:

    also do not use cursors

    what does that mean ? anyway, if I remember correctly, one can transform a recursive function to a iterative function; is that what you mean ?

    Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

    P Offline
    P Offline
    Preyatham
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    firstly i am talking in sql and not in any other technology... see here is the exact question...write a procedure in which you need to display all direct reports of you..if you do not have a direct report then go for your manager and list his direct reports...write this proc without recursion and without using cursors in the procedure....

    bzinez

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Preyatham

      did anyone try writing a recusion procedure without using recursion priciple.....also do not use cursors...any luck, do let me know ;)

      bzinez

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Austin
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      I am so glad I don't do this boring stuff anymore.

      A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Preyatham

        did anyone try writing a recusion procedure without using recursion priciple.....also do not use cursors...any luck, do let me know ;)

        bzinez

        S Offline
        S Offline
        SuperJdynamite
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        What you're looking for is "Common Table Expressions" -- a query type introduced in SQL Server 2005.

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Austin

          I am so glad I don't do this boring stuff anymore.

          A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Preyatham
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          i too thought this was a boring stuff..but when started to work for this, it pissed me....once i make a generic procedure i will publish here to take your comments CEO...:)

          Preyatham

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S SuperJdynamite

            What you're looking for is "Common Table Expressions" -- a query type introduced in SQL Server 2005.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Preyatham
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            I dont know "Common Table Expression". But my intension is to write such a most wanted procedure using only loops and developer friendly with no complexities :-D ....

            Preyatham

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Marc Clifton

              Preyatham wrote:

              did anyone try writing a recusion procedure without using recursion priciple.....also do not use cursors...

              Sure. You just need a big enough hammer, and *splat* everything breaks up into nice small chuncks. Marc

              Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Preyatham
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              hahahaha...will do that..:)

              Preyatham

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Preyatham

                I dont know "Common Table Expression". But my intension is to write such a most wanted procedure using only loops and developer friendly with no complexities :-D ....

                Preyatham

                S Offline
                S Offline
                SuperJdynamite
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                "I dont know "Common Table Expression"." It was tacitly implied that you should Google it and learn more about it. "But my intension is to write such a most wanted procedure using only loops" SQL + loops = terrible idea.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Colin Angus Mackay

                  Have you tried this?[^] :-D

                  Upcoming FREE developer events: * Developer Day Scotland Recent blog posts: * The Value of Smaller Methods * Creating Many-to-Many joins My website | blog

                  Mike HankeyM Offline
                  Mike HankeyM Offline
                  Mike Hankey
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Good eye! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Mike

                  Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away. "George Carlin

                  Semper Fi http://www.hq4thmarinescomm.com[^]

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Preyatham

                    i too thought this was a boring stuff..but when started to work for this, it pissed me....once i make a generic procedure i will publish here to take your comments CEO...:)

                    Preyatham

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Chris Austin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    Preyatham wrote:

                    .once i make a generic procedure i will publish here

                    Thats a great approach. Peer review is great way to improve your skills.

                    Preyatham wrote:

                    i too thought this was a boring stuff..but when started to work for this, it pissed me

                    Same for me. Nothing annoyed me more that working with SQL.

                    Preyatham wrote:

                    o take your comments CEO..

                    It's CPs closest description to what I do. I own and run 3 businesses, and do all I can to avoid extra work. :laugh:

                    A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Colin Angus Mackay

                      Have you tried this?[^] :-D

                      Upcoming FREE developer events: * Developer Day Scotland Recent blog posts: * The Value of Smaller Methods * Creating Many-to-Many joins My website | blog

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      Garth J Lancaster
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      I think the subtlness of that was lost !!! - I was thinking of replying with the saying 'to first understand recursion you must understand recursion' and hit your link, which illustrates it nicely - snicker :-) 'g'

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups