Products beginning with the letter "I"
-
How about hazelnut jalapeno mocha?
Software Zen:
delete this;Gary Wheeler wrote:
jalapeno
I actually don't like the flavor of jalapeno. Jalapeno has a sickening sweet taste with only mild heat. Give me more punch in flavor and heat. How about Kona Habanero blend? or maybe Ares Launch Exaust coffee (with Naga extract)?
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
Like Interacx. The problem is, if I create a class like
IXFoobaz, it looks like an interface, what with that leading I. And then if the last letter is and X and you abbreviate like I did above, then a class (which I actually have) calledIXXmlContainerjust starts to look gawdawful and confusing. Especially since the class implementsIXmlContainer, which is, you guessed it, an interface. :sigh: MarcYeah, you gotta love the whole interface naming convention. IUnknown. IDispatch. IChihuahua...
Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com
-
Gary Wheeler wrote:
jalapeno
I actually don't like the flavor of jalapeno. Jalapeno has a sickening sweet taste with only mild heat. Give me more punch in flavor and heat. How about Kona Habanero blend? or maybe Ares Launch Exaust coffee (with Naga extract)?
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
Like Interacx. The problem is, if I create a class like
IXFoobaz, it looks like an interface, what with that leading I. And then if the last letter is and X and you abbreviate like I did above, then a class (which I actually have) calledIXXmlContainerjust starts to look gawdawful and confusing. Especially since the class implementsIXmlContainer, which is, you guessed it, an interface. :sigh: Marc -
Gary Wheeler wrote:
Well, at least you're not using hydrazine for cream
nah. He'd probably use that, as a chaser... X|
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL -
Gary Wheeler wrote:
This kind of Ares[^]? Well, at least you're not using hydrazine for cream...
yup, see that tiny rocket at the top? We've got the test contract locally. They will be testing the escape system here even to the point of not only simulating, but also executing a full scale destructive failure and attempting an escape just ahead of the explosion. We're talking live action, edge of the seat, Die hard 2 ejection seat ahead of the explosion, fun... unmanned of course with a dozen or more cameras whirring on at extreme high speed taking in all the detail. I can't wait... :-D oh... and I googled this[^] :laugh: :laugh:
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
Marc Clifton wrote:
can I ask other Java questions on the Lounge
Certainly; but please start your subject with "URGENT! PLZ HELP!!!", so we can provide you with a rapid and effective snide remark helpful response. :-\
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTLDouglas Troy wrote:
Certainly; but please start your subject with "URGENT! PLZ HELP!!!", so we can provide you with a rapid and effective snide remark helpful response.
That's *our Indian* trade mark. Why won't you come up with something original you loser? ;P
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
-
dnh wrote:
Why not spell it out, like InteracxXmlContainer. Too long?
To follow up with a good reason why its too long, is that these are subclassed controls and in the form designer's tool box, I really don't want "Interacx" to swallow up the control name, especially for controls like "Date" and "Time", which are half of the word "Interacx". So I opted for "IX" to improve the readability of the form designer's toolbox. Of course, I could have figured out how to strip off the header. Hmmmm.... Marc
-
dnh wrote:
Why not spell it out, like InteracxXmlContainer. Too long?
To follow up with a good reason why its too long, is that these are subclassed controls and in the form designer's tool box, I really don't want "Interacx" to swallow up the control name, especially for controls like "Date" and "Time", which are half of the word "Interacx". So I opted for "IX" to improve the readability of the form designer's toolbox. Of course, I could have figured out how to strip off the header. Hmmmm.... Marc
Hmm that's indeed good reason!
Marc Clifton wrote:
Of course, I could have figured out how to strip off the header. Hmmmm....
:)
[My Blog]
"Visual studio desperately needs some performance improvements. It is sometimes almost as slow as eclipse." - Rüdiger Klaehn
"Real men use mspaint for writing code and notepad for designing graphics." - Anna-Jayne Metcalfe -
dnh wrote:
InteracxXmlContainer
Because XML is correctly written as "XML" and not "Xml." Peace!
-=- James
Please rate this message - let me know if I helped or not! * * *If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
See DeleteFXPFiles -
...are far worse. You cannot use it as namespace name.
You have, what I would term, a very formal turn of phrase not seen in these isles since the old King passed from this world to the next. martin_hughes on VDK
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
...are far worse. You cannot use it as namespace name.
another great reason to have a TLA. TLA's make good prefixes or namespaces. :) well... until you get to the acronym abreviation for RRDD: R2D2 and realize that the programmer has seen way too many movies.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
Yeah, you gotta love the whole interface naming convention. IUnknown. IDispatch. IChihuahua...
Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com
-
Yeah, you gotta love the whole interface naming convention. IUnknown. IDispatch. IChihuahua...
Christopher Duncan Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes Coming soon: Got a career question? Ask the Attack Chihuahua! www.PracticalUSA.com
Christopher Duncan wrote:
IUnknown. IDispatch. IChihuahua...
ICaramba... :omg:
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
Douglas Troy wrote:
Certainly; but please start your subject with "URGENT! PLZ HELP!!!", so we can provide you with a rapid and effective snide remark helpful response.
That's *our Indian* trade mark. Why won't you come up with something original you loser? ;P
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
That's *our Indian* trade mark.
That's odd, I thought "Hi! Welcome to 7-11" was ... ;P
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL -
Like Interacx. The problem is, if I create a class like
IXFoobaz, it looks like an interface, what with that leading I. And then if the last letter is and X and you abbreviate like I did above, then a class (which I actually have) calledIXXmlContainerjust starts to look gawdawful and confusing. Especially since the class implementsIXmlContainer, which is, you guessed it, an interface. :sigh: MarcPerhaps you could use something I-ish from Unicode? Î I I I ?
-
Like Interacx. The problem is, if I create a class like
IXFoobaz, it looks like an interface, what with that leading I. And then if the last letter is and X and you abbreviate like I did above, then a class (which I actually have) calledIXXmlContainerjust starts to look gawdawful and confusing. Especially since the class implementsIXmlContainer, which is, you guessed it, an interface. :sigh: Marc -
Like Interacx. The problem is, if I create a class like
IXFoobaz, it looks like an interface, what with that leading I. And then if the last letter is and X and you abbreviate like I did above, then a class (which I actually have) calledIXXmlContainerjust starts to look gawdawful and confusing. Especially since the class implementsIXmlContainer, which is, you guessed it, an interface. :sigh: MarcUmmm - isn't that what namespaces are for, rather than using a product specific prefix? Then you could have
Interacx::Foobaz... -
Like Interacx. The problem is, if I create a class like
IXFoobaz, it looks like an interface, what with that leading I. And then if the last letter is and X and you abbreviate like I did above, then a class (which I actually have) calledIXXmlContainerjust starts to look gawdawful and confusing. Especially since the class implementsIXmlContainer, which is, you guessed it, an interface. :sigh: MarcSurely your interfaces would be prefixed II then?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
Ummm - isn't that what namespaces are for, rather than using a product specific prefix? Then you could have
Interacx::Foobaz...Stuart Dootson wrote:
Ummm - isn't that what namespaces are for, rather than using a product specific prefix?
Indeed it is. But in this case, the classes in question are controls and I want to differentiate them from the .NET controls. Like how Infragistics prefixes its controls with "Ultra", I'm prefixing my controls with "IX". Marc
-
James R. Twine wrote:
Because XML is correctly written as "XML" and not "Xml."
Well, as far as my coding standards go, I try to adhere to first letter caps, all other letters lowercase, even for abbreviations and acronyms, even though I realize this goes against the standard. But it does avoid things like:
class XMLIDGUIDMapwhich I would write as:class XmlIdGuidMapMarcMarc Clifton wrote:
class XmlIdGuidMap
becomes:
class XIGMbut then, in your standard:class XiGmthat is, for acronym fans:class XGbut, again, your way imposes:class Xgso call itclass Xand don't bother about anymore. :)If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke