constructor failed??? [modified]

[CPallini]

He creates a temporary object (calling aa(5)) inside the default constructor (leaving garbage inside x), probably he wanted to initialize x with 5 instead. :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke

[toxcct]

thanks dear. but i saw your answer, so no need to flood the thread ;P :cool:

[VisualCalc][Binary Guide][CommDialogs] | [Forums Guidelines]

[ShilpiP]

Is This program working ???

cout>>x>>endl;
cin<<ch;

try using debuging than you find that why x is not giving right output :) #include "stdafx.h" #include <iostream> using namespace std;

class aa
{

public:

	aa(int t = 5)
	{
		x = t;
	}
	void print()
	{
		cout<<x <<endl;
	
	}
private:
	int x;

};
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
aa t;
t.print();
cout<<"---------------------"<<endl;

aa t1(4);
t1.print();
char ch;
cin>>ch;


return 0;

}

Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN

modified on Thursday, June 5, 2008 3:41 AM

[CPallini]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ;P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

toxcct wrote:

so no need to flood the thread

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ;P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke

[dealon]

Thank you Pallini.I got it... But i found this code can't work. class aa { public: aa():x(5) { }//... }; it said x(5) is not a base class. Thanks once again! :)

If we dream, every thing is possible!

[toxcct]

Shilpi Boosar wrote:

cout>>x>>endl;cin<<ch;

you're not serious, are you ? :~ X| when you don't know what you're talking about, please avoid posting crap, that will avoid the question poster to be confused at last.

[VisualCalc][Binary Guide][CommDialogs] | [Forums Guidelines]

[dealon]

Thans Shilpi. I'm so sorry.It's my fault. I have edited my post... :)

If we dream, every thing is possible!

[toxcct]

it's because in this class, you don't define a x member...

[VisualCalc][Binary Guide][CommDialogs] | [Forums Guidelines]

[dealon]

Sorry toxcct.It's my fault. I have edited my post. Thanks youtoxcct.

If we dream, every thing is possible!

[CPallini]

In my sample

//...

was the concise notation for

aa(int t)
{
x = t;
}
void print()
{
cout << x << endl;
}
private:
int x;
};

:)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke

[ShilpiP]

I think now you got the answer why i write that code. :)

Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN

[ShilpiP]

Its ok dealon :) He also dont know about this.

Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN

[toxcct]

nope. i still don't understand why you used the wrong operators... cout use <<, not >>

[VisualCalc][Binary Guide][CommDialogs] | [Forums Guidelines]

[dealon]

Thank you very much, Shilpi. :)

If we dream, every thing is possible!

[ShilpiP]

Actually he write the wrong code and I just do write his wrong code to explain him where he is wrong.:) I just explain him that his code is not working. LOL :laugh:

Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN

[ShilpiP]

Most Welcome :)

Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN

[Hamid Taebi]

Oh what happend for your thread I give you 5 but I think it needs to repair. :laugh:

[CPallini]

Thanks my friend. Anyway I don't bother if people don't appreciate my humour. :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke