Another severed foot found in Canada. Six and counting
-
Now that's just freakish. Someone should lend them a hand...
Citizen 20.1.01
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
-
Cats! I knew it was the cats!
-
"Our first step is to establish identity," Priceless!! In other news, British Columbia authorities have discovered the washed up remains of 6 people, all missing one foot. They're still trying to determine if there's any possible connection between the six bodies or any relation between this and any other ongoing investigations...they've asked that anyone spotting a lone foot walking around to please contact them immediately.
-
One…two…three…ufff thanks God – it’s not me. All my lower limbs are on place!
The narrow specialist in the broad sense of the word is a complete idiot in the narrow sense of the word.
-
Now that's just freakish. Someone should lend them a hand...
Citizen 20.1.01
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
-
You'd think solving this would be a shoe-in!
-------------------------------------------------------- Knowledge is knowing that the tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in fruit salad!!
-
Now that's just freakish. Someone should lend them a hand...
Citizen 20.1.01
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
-
Someone, somewhere, has a pretty exclusive collection that perhaps, only the 'donors' get to see! :wtf:
What does an agnostic, dyslexic, insomniac do? He lies awake at night wondering if there's a dog.
Sounds like they already have one foot in the grave.
Todd Smith
-
Some heads are gonig to roll if they don't solve it soon!
Todd Smith
-
Based on combinatorial math, that would be a minimum of 3 people and a maximum of six, provided the assumption that ALL people have two feet. Given the fact that some people may only have one foot, we're still stuck with a maximum of six. If we start working with the idea that some people have no feet, we get a Divide By Zero error. However, statistically, the number of people in a given population with no feet could still theoretically provide us with a maximum assuming the population is North America. This could be further limited by the reports of missing persons with no feet. Obviously, the feet found would be included in the set of people with at least one foot. If we use the union of people with at least one foot and the set of people with no feet ... oh hell, I just lost my train of thought.
-
Some heads are gonig to roll if they don't solve it soon!
Todd Smith