Reasons for upgrading from VS2003 to VS2008
-
What kind of projects do you work on? What size are they?
Todd Smith
I work for a large health insurance company. Many of the projects are > 1yr in development time, so fairly large.
-
VS 2003 is really suck. If you are using VS 2005 or 2008, you won't look back to VS 2003. Upgrade it ~ - if you want to improve the developer's productivity - if you want to develop .NET 2.0 or 3.0 or 3.5 projects. (ASP.NET 3.5 or 2.0 is really awesome. ) etc
Thanks and Regards, Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)
You need to correct your grammar. It should be: "VS 2003 is teh suck"
cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
-
I'll give you one dam good one: Mainsteam support ends this year[^]. Forget the rest, don't use unsupported software to develop your app's you're only asking for trouble.
Simon
-
I received an email that we would not be doing the upgrade unless I can provide 'business reasons' for why we should upgrade. I'm doing some research on my own, but thought that you guys could give me quite a few that I would probably overlook. Thanks!
Because, like, it's currently 2008, and Visual Studio is called "Visual Studio 2008" so they, like, go together. Like Peanut butter and Jam. Or something. Just tell him all the cool kids are using VS 2008 and he doesn't want to be considered uncool, right?
cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
-
I received an email that we would not be doing the upgrade unless I can provide 'business reasons' for why we should upgrade. I'm doing some research on my own, but thought that you guys could give me quite a few that I would probably overlook. Thanks!
I'm still doing most of my development in VS 2003, but I have VC++ 6, VS 2003, VS 2005 and VS 2008 installed. All I would say, is if you are going to upgrade, avoid VS 2005 - it's slow as hell (especially without the SP1 update and the fixes for Intellisense). Really. Don't bother with VS 2005. It's poor. Go for VS 2008, it looks similar, is better in everyway and is faster. Mike
-
I received an email that we would not be doing the upgrade unless I can provide 'business reasons' for why we should upgrade. I'm doing some research on my own, but thought that you guys could give me quite a few that I would probably overlook. Thanks!
Four out of five developers who don't receive the latest tools "go postal". (The fifth one shreds his documents and retires.)
-
- Better gradients - Toolbar icons more inline with the blurry, illegible Office 2003 icons. - Because Microsoft released it Don't feel bad, until a month ago I was still on VS 2003 at work. Now I have VS 2005, but as far as I know no one at work has 2008.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog
Jim Crafton wrote:
Don't feel bad, until a month ago I was still on VS 2003 at work. Now I have VS 2005, but as far as I know no one at work has 2008.
Heh, I still haven't moved everything from VC6 to VC9 :rolleyes: It compiles already. can we prease release it now pretty prease?
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist -
No, but I've had windows patches break apps, and thanks to the fact they are still under mainstream support, Microsoft fix the break. It's not really about the support hotline, it's more about the fact MS will ensure it continues to work.
Simon
-
I received an email that we would not be doing the upgrade unless I can provide 'business reasons' for why we should upgrade. I'm doing some research on my own, but thought that you guys could give me quite a few that I would probably overlook. Thanks!
Because the Visual C++ Feature Pack only runs in VC++2008.
Stupidity is an International Association - Enrique Jardiel Poncela Die deutsche Sprache sollte sanft und ehrfurchtsvoll zu den toten Sprachen abgelegt werden, denn nur die Toten haben die Zeit, diese Sprache zu lernen. - Mark Twain
-
Togakangaroo wrote:
Ending support is an interesting reason, but the first question from management will be what does Microsoft supporting vs2003 get me? It's not like there's a hot-line that I can call with questions.
Well, actually, there is a hot line you can call with questions. If you have an MSDN subscription you get some free calls, if not, you pay per "incident". But more importantly, "support" is a guarantee from Microsoft that the product will continue to work. Once support ends, you have no guarantee that it will still work. MS might release a patch to windows to fix some critical security flaw, but in doing so, breaks VS2003, well they aren't going to care.
Simon
Really? Didn't know that, would that just be for Visual Studio bugs or for .NET how-do-I-do-this questions as well? Also, as I said, doesn't that chart imply that support ended in 2007 anyways?
-
I received an email that we would not be doing the upgrade unless I can provide 'business reasons' for why we should upgrade. I'm doing some research on my own, but thought that you guys could give me quite a few that I would probably overlook. Thanks!
Possibility to use LINQ and other .NET 3.5 features you will otherwise have to use notepad and the bare compiler for. Fastly improved ASP.NET support. Mayor improvements of productivity in the code editor, although I can still recommend resharper or coderush. Also, you can't do WCF services in VS2003, which I think is important if you are doing anything remotely service oriented with the .NET framework.
WM. What about weapons of mass-construction? "What? Its an Apple MacBook Pro. They are sexy!" - Paul Watson My blog
-
- Better gradients - Toolbar icons more inline with the blurry, illegible Office 2003 icons. - Because Microsoft released it Don't feel bad, until a month ago I was still on VS 2003 at work. Now I have VS 2005, but as far as I know no one at work has 2008.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog
Jim Crafton wrote:
Don't feel bad, until a month ago I was still on VS 2003 at work. Now I have VS 2005, but as far as I know no one at work has 2008.
I had VS 6.0 until the first of the year. Now I have vs 2005. But at home where the fun coding goes on, I have VS 2008. Of course my machine is better at home, too. :)
-
Really? Didn't know that, would that just be for Visual Studio bugs or for .NET how-do-I-do-this questions as well? Also, as I said, doesn't that chart imply that support ended in 2007 anyways?
Togakangaroo wrote:
Really? Didn't know that, would that just be for Visual Studio bugs or for .NET how-do-I-do-this questions as well?
Both I think, but never used it so I could be wrong. (You can also get free support via the forums for stuff like that, and with an MSDN license I believe you get free live chat, but again, never used it)
Togakangaroo wrote:
Also, as I said, doesn't that chart imply that support ended in 2007 anyways?
Sorry, I forgot about that part of your post. No vs2002 support ends in 2007, for vs2003 it's 14/10/2008. The final column is when the service pack stops being supported. This means that Vs2003 with no service pack stops being supported in 2007, but provided you keep up to date with the service packs, of which there is currently 1, you'll be supported till 14/10/2008.
Simon
-
You need to correct your grammar. It should be: "VS 2003 is teh suck"
cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
-
I received an email that we would not be doing the upgrade unless I can provide 'business reasons' for why we should upgrade. I'm doing some research on my own, but thought that you guys could give me quite a few that I would probably overlook. Thanks!
jchigg2000 wrote:
I can provide 'business reasons'
Microsoft's entire development has been adaptive to customer's needs, developing programming resources is one of their core competencies. Working with archaic technology while our customers and competition uses the latest and greatest technologies to their advantage is where we have suffered from reactive rather than proactive measures. by upgrading to the latest the company gains the advantage of having a proactive mindset for adaptive client-based development. It is truly a win-win scenario as the development using modern tools give our customers the advantage of modern power and technology while providing cheaper use of man-power resources to our own company. Truly the bottom-line effect of latest technology should go straight to the top-of-the-house as an advantage of increased efficiency and adaptive technologies in a client-based focus, saving money and gaining power is something that shows respect to the core competency of our company. We would be moving ahead rather than attempting to nail jello to the tree by using older technology in a modern world. Surely this should be obvious now how we can move-ahead into the new century with advantages of new technology saving money for our bottom line! yes, there are about 5 bingos there.
-
jchigg2000 wrote:
I can provide 'business reasons'
Microsoft's entire development has been adaptive to customer's needs, developing programming resources is one of their core competencies. Working with archaic technology while our customers and competition uses the latest and greatest technologies to their advantage is where we have suffered from reactive rather than proactive measures. by upgrading to the latest the company gains the advantage of having a proactive mindset for adaptive client-based development. It is truly a win-win scenario as the development using modern tools give our customers the advantage of modern power and technology while providing cheaper use of man-power resources to our own company. Truly the bottom-line effect of latest technology should go straight to the top-of-the-house as an advantage of increased efficiency and adaptive technologies in a client-based focus, saving money and gaining power is something that shows respect to the core competency of our company. We would be moving ahead rather than attempting to nail jello to the tree by using older technology in a modern world. Surely this should be obvious now how we can move-ahead into the new century with advantages of new technology saving money for our bottom line! yes, there are about 5 bingos there.
I think I'm going to paste that right into my email!
-
I received an email that we would not be doing the upgrade unless I can provide 'business reasons' for why we should upgrade. I'm doing some research on my own, but thought that you guys could give me quite a few that I would probably overlook. Thanks!
There's no need. Programming hasn't gotten any easier or better in the last five years. Just keep using VS 2003. :|
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
-
jchigg2000 wrote:
I can provide 'business reasons'
Microsoft's entire development has been adaptive to customer's needs, developing programming resources is one of their core competencies. Working with archaic technology while our customers and competition uses the latest and greatest technologies to their advantage is where we have suffered from reactive rather than proactive measures. by upgrading to the latest the company gains the advantage of having a proactive mindset for adaptive client-based development. It is truly a win-win scenario as the development using modern tools give our customers the advantage of modern power and technology while providing cheaper use of man-power resources to our own company. Truly the bottom-line effect of latest technology should go straight to the top-of-the-house as an advantage of increased efficiency and adaptive technologies in a client-based focus, saving money and gaining power is something that shows respect to the core competency of our company. We would be moving ahead rather than attempting to nail jello to the tree by using older technology in a modern world. Surely this should be obvious now how we can move-ahead into the new century with advantages of new technology saving money for our bottom line! yes, there are about 5 bingos there.
El Corazon wrote:
Microsoft's entire development has been adaptive to customer's needs, developing programming resources is one of their core competencies. Working with archaic technology while our customers and competition uses the latest and greatest technologies to their advantage is where we have suffered from reactive rather than proactive measures. by upgrading to the latest the company gains the advantage of having a proactive mindset for adaptive client-based development. It is truly a win-win scenario as the development using modern tools give our customers the advantage of modern power and technology while providing cheaper use of man-power resources to our own company. Truly the bottom-line effect of latest technology should go straight to the top-of-the-house as an advantage of increased efficiency and adaptive technologies in a client-based focus, saving money and gaining power is something that shows respect to the core competency of our company. We would be moving ahead rather than attempting to nail jello to the tree by using older technology in a modern world. Surely this should be obvious now how we can move-ahead into the new century with advantages of new technology saving money for our bottom line!
:wtf: You must have a business / marketing degree. That is some seriously good BS.
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
-
I received an email that we would not be doing the upgrade unless I can provide 'business reasons' for why we should upgrade. I'm doing some research on my own, but thought that you guys could give me quite a few that I would probably overlook. Thanks!
If you're on pro rather than VSTS, then testing tools.....
C# has already designed away most of the tedium of C++.
-
Jim Crafton wrote:
but as far as I know no one has 2008
I've been using it for months - It is great!
Recent blog posts: * Introduction to LINQ to XML (Part 1) - (Part 2) - (part 3) My website | Blog
Me too - superb piece of software....Must be a British thing - perhaps we appreciate things that don't have shiny lights and big bangs too much ;)
C# has already designed away most of the tedium of C++.