Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Google Chrome

Google Chrome

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmlcom
26 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Shog9 0

    About time someone else made a browser... this whole IE-Opera-FF triangle***** was getting lame. *yeah, i know, Safari technically exists... but that's just Mac lust.

    ----

    You're right. These facts that you've laid out totally contradict the wild ramblings that I pulled off the back of cornflakes packets.

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Quick
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    They are using the Apple WebKit rendering engine though it seems, so if it works for Safari now it will probably work for Google Chrome fine. http://webkit.org/[^] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit[^]

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      With Google Chrome's use of WebKit, looks like it will not be long before you see Google Android making an appearance on some mobile phones.

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Paul Selormey
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      I am not sure it will ever get to Japan :~ - the mobile phone market here is just closed to foreign goods. If they are targeting the emerging markets and Africa, then they will be better of. Vodafone's activities here was expected to bring some changes, but they have since left the market selling *all* assets to Softbank (owner of Yahoo/Japan). Best regards, Paul.

      Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Paul Selormey

        Google Chrome...[^] it seems Google is considering a browser. Best regards, Paul.

        Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.

        K Offline
        K Offline
        kirankss
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        I am waiting for it to stabilize before I switch from Firefox. Interestingly Google OS is Google chrome. http://googlesystem.blogspot.com

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Paul Selormey

          Google Chrome...[^] it seems Google is considering a browser. Best regards, Paul.

          Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.

          N Offline
          N Offline
          NormDroid
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          It was only a matter if time, I'm actually suprised the didn't begin developing one sooner.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E El Corazon

            If Microsoft is Borg, that would make google more of Body Snatcher[^] they remake everything.... :) I'll give it shot if they finish it. So far they actually do have a few quality things, minus some spying on activities.... Work I know I can't, all google products are forbidden at work due to spyware restrictions. Not sure the world is ready for Yet Another Browser.... I'll stick to firefox until this is reviewed after release. :)

            _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Steve Mayfield
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            I wonder if Chrome will allow us to select the search provider (like IE was forced to do by uhhh Google & Yahoo) or will it restrict us to only use Google :confused:

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Steven Quick

              They are using the Apple WebKit rendering engine though it seems, so if it works for Safari now it will probably work for Google Chrome fine. http://webkit.org/[^] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit[^]

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stuart Dootson
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              That's the first sane thing I've heard about this Google browser - at least they're reusing a decent open-source rendering engine...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Paul Selormey

                Google Chrome...[^] it seems Google is considering a browser. Best regards, Paul.

                Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rocky Moore
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Wouldn't it just be better to eliminate all but one browser and have it open source and be done with it? I mean, we have two top browsers and neither can seem to get even the web standards implememented properly after all these years. Is the standards maybe the real problem here? Of course, now I guess we would not need a Google Toolbar :)

                Rocky <>< Recent Blog Post: More on Windows Live Writer..

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Shog9 0

                  About time someone else made a browser... this whole IE-Opera-FF triangle***** was getting lame. *yeah, i know, Safari technically exists... but that's just Mac lust.

                  ----

                  You're right. These facts that you've laid out totally contradict the wild ramblings that I pulled off the back of cornflakes packets.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stuart Dootson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Shog9 wrote:

                  Opera...*yeah, i know, Safari technically exists... but that's just Mac lust.

                  Given that Safari's got more users that Opera (almost 10x more according to one source[^] I found) and Webkit is being used in more applications (including Google Chrome, from what I can tell), I think it's Opera that's the marginalised browser out of the two. And hell, yeah, I use Safari (although I'd be using Firefox if my Mac was a bit newer - FF just starts too slowly on a 1.4GHz G4 compared with Safari)

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paul Selormey

                    Google Chrome...[^] it seems Google is considering a browser. Best regards, Paul.

                    Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    Peter Kassenaar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Here's a link to the detailed comic book (by Google) on Google Chrome: http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/#[^] Can't remember that I've ever seen a new software introduction accompanied/explained by a *comic book*. Anyone? Regards, Peter.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Paul Selormey

                      Google Chrome...[^] it seems Google is considering a browser. Best regards, Paul.

                      Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      Kevin McFarlane
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      It would be nice if we could get rid of the dreaded JavaScript though.

                      Kevin

                      P S 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • S Shog9 0

                        Shucks, Richard - don't go making lemons out of lemonade! :-\ We've lived for decades in a world where software is expected to run on hardware from numerous manufacturers, in myriad environments and countless configurations. There are problems, yes, but for the most part it works and we're all better off for it. Why? Because everyone has a vested interest in staying more-or-less compatible with everyone else while moving the state of the industry foreward. No one is releasing Media Center PCs with built-in EGA video. ;) The browser market has been dominated by one fiefdom after another, each acting without regard for anyone else. A PCjr with a grafted-on NVIDIA card competing against an Apple IIe with a terrabyte RAID setup. Madness! Google's browser may never take off, but i'm willing to bet we'll see any innovative features rolled into mainstream browsers anyway. Competition ain't bad...

                        ----

                        You're right. These facts that you've laid out totally contradict the wild ramblings that I pulled off the back of cornflakes packets.

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        Kevin McFarlane
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        Shog9 wrote:

                        Competition ain't bad...

                        I think there are enough browsers already. Too much choice can be almost as bad as no choice.

                        Shog9 wrote:

                        i'm willing to bet we'll see any innovative features rolled into mainstream browsers anyway

                        We already have that with most recent innovations having been pioneered by Opera and then been made relatively mainstream by Firefox, followed by IE.

                        Kevin

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Rocky Moore

                          Wouldn't it just be better to eliminate all but one browser and have it open source and be done with it? I mean, we have two top browsers and neither can seem to get even the web standards implememented properly after all these years. Is the standards maybe the real problem here? Of course, now I guess we would not need a Google Toolbar :)

                          Rocky <>< Recent Blog Post: More on Windows Live Writer..

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          Kevin McFarlane
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          Rocky Moore wrote:

                          Wouldn't it just be better to eliminate all but one browser and have it open source and be done with it?

                          No. Choice is good but, as I said above in reply to Shog, not too much choice.

                          Kevin

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • K Kevin McFarlane

                            It would be nice if we could get rid of the dreaded JavaScript though.

                            Kevin

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            Paul Selormey
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            They will first have to command the browser market. With MS seriously fighting against the proposed ECMAScript 4.x, you know there is not going to be any improvements soon. Best regards, Paul.

                            Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Stuart Dootson

                              Shog9 wrote:

                              Opera...*yeah, i know, Safari technically exists... but that's just Mac lust.

                              Given that Safari's got more users that Opera (almost 10x more according to one source[^] I found) and Webkit is being used in more applications (including Google Chrome, from what I can tell), I think it's Opera that's the marginalised browser out of the two. And hell, yeah, I use Safari (although I'd be using Firefox if my Mac was a bit newer - FF just starts too slowly on a 1.4GHz G4 compared with Safari)

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mike Dimmick
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=0[^]: 6.37% plays 0.74%, or 8.6 times. IE 8 Beta 2 is showing[^] at 0.23% already.

                              DoEvents: Generating unexpected recursion since 1991

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • K Kevin McFarlane

                                It would be nice if we could get rid of the dreaded JavaScript though.

                                Kevin

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Shog9 0
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Kevin McFarlane wrote:

                                It would be nice if we could get rid of the dreaded JavaScript though.

                                Awww, dude... JS rocks!

                                ----

                                You're right. These facts that you've laid out totally contradict the wild ramblings that I pulled off the back of cornflakes packets.

                                K 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Shog9 0

                                  Kevin McFarlane wrote:

                                  It would be nice if we could get rid of the dreaded JavaScript though.

                                  Awww, dude... JS rocks!

                                  ----

                                  You're right. These facts that you've laid out totally contradict the wild ramblings that I pulled off the back of cornflakes packets.

                                  K Offline
                                  K Offline
                                  Kevin McFarlane
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  I like what JavaScript does, I hate the way it does it; i.e., I hate the language. Too many weeks of JavaScript hell in my last contract.:mad:

                                  Kevin

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups