Extraordinary popular delusions and the madness of crowds
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
I detest everything Palin represents - ultra-conservative religious values, obedience to God, small town raised, "hockey mom", Ms. Congeniality, apparent dishonesty, a view of the world a the playground for the human race, etc...
I agree with you on everything except the small town raised bit. Before moving to Phoenix I was raised in a town with a population of less than 2,000. I don't think living in a small town in anyway damaged me nor do I see small town living as a negative thing.
73Zeppelin wrote:
Her personality, worldview and physical appearance grate upon my nerves like you wouldn't believe.
I had just started watching TV again since collage football is starting up. When I see and hear her it just makes me want to turn off the TV.
73Zeppelin wrote:
I believe this woman has the capacity to regress the U.S. further into a state of pseudo-theocracy by giving a voice to the evangelical crowd.
Same here. Too be honest I am amazed at how easily my fellow citizens are allowing this to happen.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
Chris Austin wrote:
When I see and hear her it just makes me want to turn off the TV.
Yep, I can't stand her pompous demeanor and screechy voice. I actually tuned in to C-SPAN at around noon the Friday after McCain's convention speech. McCain and Palin where doing a rally in a small town of Wisconsin (I think). I couldn't believe it when a couple of minutes into Palin speech, she started repeating the exact same lines she had given at the convention a couple of nights before. :wtf:
Q: What's the difference between a hockey mom reformer and a business-as-usual pork-barrel spending politician?
A: Lipstick -
BoneSoft wrote:
I also heard something about early Republican primaries being open and lots of democrats voting in those primaries for the for most liberal candidates, i.e. McCain and Juliani. But I don't know how much effect that may have had if it was what happened.
I suspect very little since an equal number would be voting for the most unelectable nut on the ballot. Texas had open primaries and the R's that were talking about crossing the line were split ~50/50 in who they thought voting for would be most effective in monkey wrenching. :rolleyes:
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall
This election seems a good argument against having too many candidates. You would think the more the better, but it doesn't appear that way.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
Chris Austin wrote:
When I see and hear her it just makes me want to turn off the TV.
Yep, I can't stand her pompous demeanor and screechy voice. I actually tuned in to C-SPAN at around noon the Friday after McCain's convention speech. McCain and Palin where doing a rally in a small town of Wisconsin (I think). I couldn't believe it when a couple of minutes into Palin speech, she started repeating the exact same lines she had given at the convention a couple of nights before. :wtf:
Q: What's the difference between a hockey mom reformer and a business-as-usual pork-barrel spending politician?
A: LipstickAl Beback wrote:
she started repeating the exact same lines she had given at the convention a couple of nights before.
Yeah, that seemed really strange. It was disappointing to be honest, how stupid have we become to put up with this obvious crap from both parties.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
-
Oakman wrote:
Palin was a brilliant choice politically.
You mentioned in another related post that her appointment may have been mostly political. Which I hope is not the case, and time will tell. But if that is the case, with all the build up, she will have some high expectation come debate time. I'll be anxious to see how she does. I was already a little disappointed to see her make the same acceptance speach a few days later in another venue. If she is a prop, it will hurt them badly. But if she's not, Obama is in trouble. What I can say for her is she's made this election exciting for a change.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
What I can say for her is she's made this election exciting for a change.
In about the same sense that topless mud-wrestling is exciting...
-
You make it sounds as if there's nothing to like or admire in the woman. Or do you just dislike the fact that there's finally somebody on the ticket that represents the right? Because that's what the excitement is about. Nobody on the right wanted McCain, I still have no idea how he got there. Forget swing votes and disgruntled Hillary supporters, Palin will get Republicans off the couch to vote. And that is what has the left scared into making one stupid mistake after another. Ignoring her wouldn't have done them much good either, but it would have done them less harm.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
, I still have no idea how he got there.
Because he did the same thing he has done his entire career; he changed his positions on key points. Also, the right has lost it's way. It is no longer about small government, state's rights, personal liberty and, finical responsibility. The right just like the left is now dominated by special interest concerns.
BoneSoft wrote:
You make it sounds as if there's nothing to like or admire in the woman.
I personally haven't found any admirable qualities as of yet. So far she seems to be a typical politician.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
-
I also heard something about early Republican primaries being open and lots of democrats voting in those primaries for the for most liberal candidates, i.e. McCain and Juliani. But I don't know how much effect that may have had if it was what happened. But thanks, that's the first explaination I've heard, and it makes some sense. I was on the verge of assuming an evil Democrat conspiracy.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
But thanks, that's the first explaination I've heard, and it makes some sense. I was on the verge of assuming an evil Democrat conspiracy.
You mean something like "Operation Chaos" by Rush and his dildo heads.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
-
Oakman wrote:
Palin was a brilliant choice politically.
You mentioned in another related post that her appointment may have been mostly political. Which I hope is not the case, and time will tell. But if that is the case, with all the build up, she will have some high expectation come debate time. I'll be anxious to see how she does. I was already a little disappointed to see her make the same acceptance speach a few days later in another venue. If she is a prop, it will hurt them badly. But if she's not, Obama is in trouble. What I can say for her is she's made this election exciting for a change.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
I was already a little disappointed to see her make the same acceptance speach a few days later in another venue
It is standard for politicians to have a stump speech that they give over and over again, embellishing it only slightly for each venue. But normally that is NOT the same speech that 37 million people have already watched. My reaction to hearing the same jokes over and over again is about the same as it would be if I were to be forced to watch the same episode of House (a brilliantly funny show) over and over again. X| She needs new jokes. Even Milton Berle knew he couldn't tell the same ones week after week.
BoneSoft wrote:
What I can say for her is she's made this election exciting for a change.
I was certainly wrong when I told you that McCain had made a big mistake in picking her. It seems my career as a pontificator might be very, very short.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
BoneSoft wrote:
I was already a little disappointed to see her make the same acceptance speach a few days later in another venue
It is standard for politicians to have a stump speech that they give over and over again, embellishing it only slightly for each venue. But normally that is NOT the same speech that 37 million people have already watched. My reaction to hearing the same jokes over and over again is about the same as it would be if I were to be forced to watch the same episode of House (a brilliantly funny show) over and over again. X| She needs new jokes. Even Milton Berle knew he couldn't tell the same ones week after week.
BoneSoft wrote:
What I can say for her is she's made this election exciting for a change.
I was certainly wrong when I told you that McCain had made a big mistake in picking her. It seems my career as a pontificator might be very, very short.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Oakman wrote:
I was certainly wrong when I told you that McCain had made a big mistake in picking her
I thought the same. But, it will be interesting to see how she holds up to Biden in the debates. He is a pretty bright and seemingly genuine guy; if she attempts to make the debate personal I think he will rip her up. But, if she steps up on the current issues it could be an interesting debate. {Edit} I should add that I don't really know if the results of the debates will matter. People seem to have really fallen into the "red vs blue" mentality so there seems to be little concern about the merit in actual platform or policy.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
-
BoneSoft wrote:
But thanks, that's the first explaination I've heard, and it makes some sense. I was on the verge of assuming an evil Democrat conspiracy.
You mean something like "Operation Chaos" by Rush and his dildo heads.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
Chris Austin wrote:
You mean something like "Operation Chaos" by Rush and his dildo heads.
The first time cross-over voting played in the primaries was in New Hampshire. The press had declared Obama the winner the day before the vote was taken, so many people who might have voted for him decided instead to vote for McCain in the Republican primary. The three main results were that Hillary won, reviving her campaign; McCain won, reviving his campaign; and Keith Olbermann had apoplexy on camera.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Oakman wrote:
I was certainly wrong when I told you that McCain had made a big mistake in picking her
I thought the same. But, it will be interesting to see how she holds up to Biden in the debates. He is a pretty bright and seemingly genuine guy; if she attempts to make the debate personal I think he will rip her up. But, if she steps up on the current issues it could be an interesting debate. {Edit} I should add that I don't really know if the results of the debates will matter. People seem to have really fallen into the "red vs blue" mentality so there seems to be little concern about the merit in actual platform or policy.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
Chris Austin wrote:
I should add that I don't really know if the results of the debates will matter. People seem to have really fallen into the "red vs blue" mentality so there seems to be little concern about the merit in actual platform or policy.
I think there are many true independents left in this country. But since they have few positive feelings about either of the candidates, they remain apathetic about the election. However, they are the ones who, in the swing states, will ultimately make the decision about who will be the next president. The good news for you is that they seem to be leaning slightly in favor of your guy.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
BoneSoft wrote:
What I can say for her is she's made this election exciting for a change.
In about the same sense that topless mud-wrestling is exciting...
No, I was thinking more like baby-oil.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
Chris Austin wrote:
I should add that I don't really know if the results of the debates will matter. People seem to have really fallen into the "red vs blue" mentality so there seems to be little concern about the merit in actual platform or policy.
I think there are many true independents left in this country. But since they have few positive feelings about either of the candidates, they remain apathetic about the election. However, they are the ones who, in the swing states, will ultimately make the decision about who will be the next president. The good news for you is that they seem to be leaning slightly in favor of your guy.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Oakman wrote:
The good news for you is that they seem to be leaning slightly in favor of your guy.
Ron Paul is my guy. I think both major party candidates are not capable of leading our country out of the obvious mediocrity we have been wallowing in since the 80s.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
-
Chris Austin wrote:
You mean something like "Operation Chaos" by Rush and his dildo heads.
The first time cross-over voting played in the primaries was in New Hampshire. The press had declared Obama the winner the day before the vote was taken, so many people who might have voted for him decided instead to vote for McCain in the Republican primary. The three main results were that Hillary won, reviving her campaign; McCain won, reviving his campaign; and Keith Olbermann had apoplexy on camera.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
You should have been here in Dallas, Texas; it was rampant among my neighbors and others that I know.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
-
Oakman wrote:
I was certainly wrong when I told you that McCain had made a big mistake in picking her
I thought the same. But, it will be interesting to see how she holds up to Biden in the debates. He is a pretty bright and seemingly genuine guy; if she attempts to make the debate personal I think he will rip her up. But, if she steps up on the current issues it could be an interesting debate. {Edit} I should add that I don't really know if the results of the debates will matter. People seem to have really fallen into the "red vs blue" mentality so there seems to be little concern about the merit in actual platform or policy.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
Chris Austin wrote:
if she attempts to make the debate personal I think he will rip her up.
I don't think that will happen. It served it's purpose in the acceptance speach in front of the audience it was intended to excite.
Chris Austin wrote:
should add that I don't really know if the results of the debates will matter.
It will matter a lot if she chokes. Barring that, I think you're right. Up until her nomination Republicans had nothing to vote for, if she proves to be a prop Obama has a shot at the White House.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
The torrent of damaging stories which have emerged in the days since Sarah Palin was tapped to be the Republican vice presidential nominee have done nothing to dampen the chants of "Sa-rah! Sa-rah!" at rallies across the United States. Link[^]. I think the title of this thread explains it all. Charles Mackay[^] would be proud.
...that mortally intolerable truth; that all deep, earnest thinking is but the intrepid effort of the soul to keep the open independence of her sea; while the wildest winds of heaven and earth conspire to cast her on the treacherous, slavish shore.
What do you call all the Obama zealots, including 500,000 germans?
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Chris Austin wrote:
I should add that I don't really know if the results of the debates will matter. People seem to have really fallen into the "red vs blue" mentality so there seems to be little concern about the merit in actual platform or policy.
I think there are many true independents left in this country. But since they have few positive feelings about either of the candidates, they remain apathetic about the election. However, they are the ones who, in the swing states, will ultimately make the decision about who will be the next president. The good news for you is that they seem to be leaning slightly in favor of your guy.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Oakman wrote:
However, they are the ones who, in the swing states, will ultimately make the decision about who will be the next president.
There could also be some surprises. Georgia has been a "safe red" state, but might actually be in play this time. Certainly Obama will command the large African-American vote (and it is irrelevant whether because of race or ideology). There is also a large working class white vote that is really stung by the current economy, and that might put aside it's racism to vote against the Republicans who are seen as the party of the rich, and who are largely sitting on their laurels here, confident that past performance predicts the future. They forget that not long ago, this was a safe Dixiecrat state, and there linger a lot of old loyalties to the Democratic party.
-
What do you call all the Obama zealots, including 500,000 germans?
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
What do you call all the Obama zealots, including 500,000 germans?
Friends of the next POTUS?
-
Oakman wrote:
The good news for you is that they seem to be leaning slightly in favor of your guy.
Ron Paul is my guy. I think both major party candidates are not capable of leading our country out of the obvious mediocrity we have been wallowing in since the 80s.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
Chris Austin wrote:
leading our country out of the obvious mediocrity we have been wallowing in since the 80s.
That will be hard to do. Speaking of problems that have mushroomed since the 80s, I want a candidate that says "I'm going to fix health care, by deporting illegal aliens, closing down McDonalds, giving tax credits for treadmill purchases and gym memberships, and educating people on how to save more than 3% of their income, to not think that debt and credit cards are great and that cooking at home is an option that should occationally be explored. And the educating part will start with the fat lazy money wasting old wrinkled white men in Congress." Of course that might not be so great on the economy...
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
You should have been here in Dallas, Texas; it was rampant among my neighbors and others that I know.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long
Chris Austin wrote:
You should have been here in Dallas, Texas; it was rampant among my neighbors and others that I know.
My son and I both voted for Hilary. It was a blast.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Chris Austin wrote:
You should have been here in Dallas, Texas; it was rampant among my neighbors and others that I know.
My son and I both voted for Hilary. It was a blast.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
I bet. My neighbor who is a card carrying liberal democrat voted for McCain while my 'better dead than blue' friend showed up at the poll and cacus for Clinton. It is pretty humorous and shows what a joke the current system is.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long