A new system to measure a CP member
-
Last week I went to a required employee training session in my company. It mainly talked about how to handle harassment and discrimination in the work place. We were told that there are three things you should not discuss in the work place: Sex, Religion, and Politics. But it seems pretty hard to judge a person wihtout knowing his opinions on those three things. Most of the topics (95% ?) in the CP lounge are related to Sex or Religion or Politics. So I figured out a simple 3-digit system to measure a person's view, may be we can optionally set the 3-digit property in our user profiles and have the 3 numbers attached to our ids automatically when posting. The 3-digit is based on your opinion on the following 3 statements. Statement one: Bush is an idiot. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree Statement two: Religion sucks. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree Statement three: Naked woman (not in front of children) is good. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree With this new system, a 111 guy would know better not to mess with a 555 guy unless he wants to start a flame war (and who doesn't? ;-) ).
212 1) disagree. I know *real* idiots, Bush isn't one. That's not to say he's particularly good at running a country, but even there i can picture worse... 2) strongly disagree. Religion is an abstract concept. It lacks all of the necessary equipment. If someone tells you they've "got religion", they don't. *People* suck. 3) disagree. *Some* naked women are good, sometimes, in some places. i.e., attractive naked women are good, now, in front of me; ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else.
---
Shog9 If I could sleep forever, I could forget about everything...
-
Last week I went to a required employee training session in my company. It mainly talked about how to handle harassment and discrimination in the work place. We were told that there are three things you should not discuss in the work place: Sex, Religion, and Politics. But it seems pretty hard to judge a person wihtout knowing his opinions on those three things. Most of the topics (95% ?) in the CP lounge are related to Sex or Religion or Politics. So I figured out a simple 3-digit system to measure a person's view, may be we can optionally set the 3-digit property in our user profiles and have the 3 numbers attached to our ids automatically when posting. The 3-digit is based on your opinion on the following 3 statements. Statement one: Bush is an idiot. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree Statement two: Religion sucks. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree Statement three: Naked woman (not in front of children) is good. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree With this new system, a 111 guy would know better not to mess with a 555 guy unless he wants to start a flame war (and who doesn't? ;-) ).
314 I should discuss only politics with Nish. ;P I vote pro drink :beer:
-
Last week I went to a required employee training session in my company. It mainly talked about how to handle harassment and discrimination in the work place. We were told that there are three things you should not discuss in the work place: Sex, Religion, and Politics. But it seems pretty hard to judge a person wihtout knowing his opinions on those three things. Most of the topics (95% ?) in the CP lounge are related to Sex or Religion or Politics. So I figured out a simple 3-digit system to measure a person's view, may be we can optionally set the 3-digit property in our user profiles and have the 3 numbers attached to our ids automatically when posting. The 3-digit is based on your opinion on the following 3 statements. Statement one: Bush is an idiot. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree Statement two: Religion sucks. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree Statement three: Naked woman (not in front of children) is good. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree With this new system, a 111 guy would know better not to mess with a 555 guy unless he wants to start a flame war (and who doesn't? ;-) ).
i think that bush is an idiot, but that doesn't define my entire political outlook. i have no use for religion, but i can't say it "sucks". i don't like mustard either, but i don't put down people who like it. i'm married, so i won't touch that 3rd one. :) -c
Conservative: One who admires radicals centuries after they're dead. -- Leo C. Rosten
-
212 1) disagree. I know *real* idiots, Bush isn't one. That's not to say he's particularly good at running a country, but even there i can picture worse... 2) strongly disagree. Religion is an abstract concept. It lacks all of the necessary equipment. If someone tells you they've "got religion", they don't. *People* suck. 3) disagree. *Some* naked women are good, sometimes, in some places. i.e., attractive naked women are good, now, in front of me; ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else.
---
Shog9 If I could sleep forever, I could forget about everything...
Shog9 wrote: ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else Anyone care for a new sig? :rolleyes: cheers, Chris Maunder
-
Shog9 wrote: ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else Anyone care for a new sig? :rolleyes: cheers, Chris Maunder
Chris Maunder wrote: Anyone care for a new sig? no thanks. i don't smoke. -c
Conservative: One who admires radicals centuries after they're dead. -- Leo C. Rosten
-
Shog9 wrote: ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else Anyone care for a new sig? :rolleyes: cheers, Chris Maunder
Chris Maunder wrote: Anyone care for a new sig? I'll bite. Its about time I quoted a fellow CPian. :P
Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
'ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else' - Shog9 -
Chris Maunder wrote: Anyone care for a new sig? I'll bite. Its about time I quoted a fellow CPian. :P
Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
'ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else' - Shog9 -
I rate as a ?x? ? because I have never met the guy to decide. x because I think you are confusing religion with faith. ? because they are Ok in the right situation. Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining. Said by Roger Wright about me.
Colin^Davies wrote: I rate as a ?x? ? because I have never met the guy to decide. x because I think you are confusing religion with faith. ? because they are Ok in the right situation. Regardz Colin J Davies Then you are a 333. You see, the system is fool-proof. :laugh:
-
i think that bush is an idiot, but that doesn't define my entire political outlook. i have no use for religion, but i can't say it "sucks". i don't like mustard either, but i don't put down people who like it. i'm married, so i won't touch that 3rd one. :) -c
Conservative: One who admires radicals centuries after they're dead. -- Leo C. Rosten
-
Last week I went to a required employee training session in my company. It mainly talked about how to handle harassment and discrimination in the work place. We were told that there are three things you should not discuss in the work place: Sex, Religion, and Politics. But it seems pretty hard to judge a person wihtout knowing his opinions on those three things. Most of the topics (95% ?) in the CP lounge are related to Sex or Religion or Politics. So I figured out a simple 3-digit system to measure a person's view, may be we can optionally set the 3-digit property in our user profiles and have the 3 numbers attached to our ids automatically when posting. The 3-digit is based on your opinion on the following 3 statements. Statement one: Bush is an idiot. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree Statement two: Religion sucks. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree Statement three: Naked woman (not in front of children) is good. 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=don't know, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree With this new system, a 111 guy would know better not to mess with a 555 guy unless he wants to start a flame war (and who doesn't? ;-) ).
155 All democrats are going to hell. In hell they will have to give away all their water and food. Bill Clinton will convince them that THIS IS A GOOD THING. Of course Bill will keep his but will tell you that he isn't drinking or eating. And the idiots will believe him :) Richard Monarchies, aristocracies, and religions....there was never a country where the majority of the people were in their secret hearts loyal to any of these institutions. Mark Twain - The Mysterious Stranger