Why *does* this work, and when will it *not* work? (Two-way MSMQ messaging using WCF)

Furty

I've been experimenting with various implementations of two-way communications using WCF over MSMQ, and without ever thinking it would work, tried the following:

using System;
using System.ServiceModel;

namespace MessagingSample
{
[ServiceContract]
public interface ISampleContract
{
[OperationContract(IsOneWay = true)]
void StartDoingSomething(string someText, SampleClient client);
}

\[ServiceBehavior\]
public class SampleClient
{
    private ISampleContract workerService;

    public void StartClient(string server)
    {
        // Init the service instance
        EndpointAddress endpointAddress = new EndpointAddress(
            new Uri(string.Format(@"net.msmq://{0}/private/SampleQueue", server)));

        NetMsmqBinding clientBinding = new NetMsmqBinding();
        clientBinding.Security.Transport.MsmqAuthenticationMode = MsmqAuthenticationMode.None;
        clientBinding.Security.Transport.MsmqProtectionLevel = System.Net.Security.ProtectionLevel.None;

        ChannelFactory<ISampleContract> channelFactory =
            new ChannelFactory<ISampleContract>(clientBinding, endpointAddress);
        workerService = channelFactory.CreateChannel();

    }

    public void StopClient()
    {
        if (workerService != null)
        {
            workerService = null;
        }
    }

    public void StartDoingSomething(string text)
    {
        if (workerService != null)
        {
            workerService.StartDoingSomething(text, this);
        }
    }

    public void DoSomethingElse(string text)
    {
        System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(text);
    }
}


\[ServiceBehavior\]
public class SampleServer : ISampleContract
{
    private ServiceHost serviceHost = null;

    public void StartServer(string server)
    {
        Uri serviceUri = new Uri(string.Format(@"net.msmq://{0}/private/SampleQueue", server));

        NetMsmqBinding serviceBinding = new NetMsmqBinding();
        serviceBinding.Security.Transport.MsmqAuthenticationMode = MsmqAuthenticationMode.None;
        serviceBinding.Security.Transport.MsmqProtectionLevel = System.Net.Security.ProtectionLevel.None;
        serviceBinding.MaxReceivedMessageSize = 1024 \* 4096;
        serviceBinding.ReaderQuotas.MaxArrayLength = 1024 \* 4096;

Meer Osman Ali

Try coding it in Java. C# sucks big time. May Allah give you the knowledge

Furty

The operative word there being try, of course. P.S. Do you always submit message board posts that make you sound like a total moron, or was this just an isolated instance?

Meer Osman Ali

Furty wrote:

Do you always submit message board posts that make you sound like a total moron, or was this just an isolated instance?

Dude i was showing u the right path for programming

Furty

Meer Osman Ali wrote:

Dude i was showing u the right path for programming

Right. Gotcha. I had you pegged as a trolling wanker, but thanks for the confirmation!

Meer Osman Ali

Furty wrote:

I had you pegged as a trolling wanker, but thanks for the confirmation!

:-D Gee have a nice day then

Lost User

Allah has given us C#. Java is an abomination to Allah, a heretic language. Are you rally suggesting that we ignore the progress that He has granted us? Ignore type-safety? Drop the increased productivity? That sounds like the arrogance that Iblis would display :omg: As Spock would say, "Live long and prosper" :-D

Dave Kreskowiak

No, pretty much every post he's made is from a completely ignorant viewpoint.

A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
2006, 2007, 2008

Pete OHanlon

If it farts like a troll, smells like a troll, and looks like a troll, shouldn't we just castrate it?

Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

Luc Pattyn

Absolutely not. It would fart, smell and look like a troll even more, and scream its heart out on top of that. On the other hand, if it intends to procreate, you would have to accept these short-term disadvantages, and go for the long-term benefits. Or act a little more effectively and solve the problem once and forever. :) PS: nothing much has changed around here, has it?

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]

Fixturized forever. :confused:

Pete OHanlon

Luc Pattyn wrote:

PS: nothing much has changed around here, has it?

Same ol', same ol'. Mind you, I've spent the last month or so working on a bit of Open Source work along with Karl Shifflett, so I've spent less time in the forums as a result.

Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys