New Bond Film..
-
I saw it over the weekend. Was good but not as good as Daniel Craigs first bond film. Lots of action in this one with some fast paced action scenes. A few cheesy moments but not as many as normal, he didnt utter his cheesy line "The names bond, James Bond" throughout the whole film. All in all 4/5. What does everyone else think?
Too short, only about an hour and forty mins, a good bond film should be 2 and a half hours. No gadgets, no real plot. OK film, just not a Bond Film.
------------------------------------ We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. - Aesop
-
Too short, only about an hour and forty mins, a good bond film should be 2 and a half hours. No gadgets, no real plot. OK film, just not a Bond Film.
------------------------------------ We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. - Aesop
Dalek Dave wrote:
Too short, only about an hour and forty mins, a good bond film should be 2 and a half hours.
I thought it was a good time, too long and you start to get bored in the cinema.
Dalek Dave wrote:
No gadgets, no real plot. OK film, just not a Bond Film.
but they had to change the format as it was getting boring and samey(is that a word? :)) with the same general plot overall. Its more about him and his raw ability to complete the jobs he has been set. I think its a change in the right direction.
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
Too short, only about an hour and forty mins, a good bond film should be 2 and a half hours.
I thought it was a good time, too long and you start to get bored in the cinema.
Dalek Dave wrote:
No gadgets, no real plot. OK film, just not a Bond Film.
but they had to change the format as it was getting boring and samey(is that a word? :)) with the same general plot overall. Its more about him and his raw ability to complete the jobs he has been set. I think its a change in the right direction.
It's a trilogy meant to show you the genesis of the Bond you know and love. The third film should introduce the gadgets, the wit, the charm, the suave killing machine. Right now he is just getting some revenge and describing the tough inner core of Bond (as you said.) (I haven't seen it yet. I just read too much :) )
cheers, Paul M. Watson.
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
Too short, only about an hour and forty mins, a good bond film should be 2 and a half hours.
I thought it was a good time, too long and you start to get bored in the cinema.
Dalek Dave wrote:
No gadgets, no real plot. OK film, just not a Bond Film.
but they had to change the format as it was getting boring and samey(is that a word? :)) with the same general plot overall. Its more about him and his raw ability to complete the jobs he has been set. I think its a change in the right direction.
I used to watch Bond films specifically for the Gadgets... As did many people I know!
-
Too short, only about an hour and forty mins, a good bond film should be 2 and a half hours. No gadgets, no real plot. OK film, just not a Bond Film.
------------------------------------ We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. - Aesop
Dalek Dave wrote:
Too short, only about an hour and forty mins, a good bond film should be 2 and a half hours.
They have learned from the Lord of the Rings, they will pout out extended and expanded DVD versions.
This signature was proudly tested on animals.
-
I saw it over the weekend. Was good but not as good as Daniel Craigs first bond film. Lots of action in this one with some fast paced action scenes. A few cheesy moments but not as many as normal, he didnt utter his cheesy line "The names bond, James Bond" throughout the whole film. All in all 4/5. What does everyone else think?
-
i like mcgyver better... then chuck norris i like chuck norris better... then mcgyver
---------------------------------------------------------- "unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep" - my daily unix command list
inspector gadget is good too.
cheers, Paul M. Watson.
-
i like mcgyver better... then chuck norris i like chuck norris better... then mcgyver
---------------------------------------------------------- "unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep" - my daily unix command list
Why is McGyver not in the ultimate showdown of ultimate destiny? :wtf:
-
I used to watch Bond films specifically for the Gadgets... As did many people I know!
Yeah, big round bouncing gadgets... :-D
-
Why is McGyver not in the ultimate showdown of ultimate destiny? :wtf:
Because he's fictional. :-D
-
Too short, only about an hour and forty mins, a good bond film should be 2 and a half hours. No gadgets, no real plot. OK film, just not a Bond Film.
------------------------------------ We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. - Aesop
Dalek Dave wrote:
Too short, only about an hour and forty mins, a good bond film should be 2 and a half hours. No gadgets, no real plot. OK film, just not a Bond Film.
:sigh: I miss Roger Moore.
"When you reach a certain level of comfort, there's nothing wrong with paying somewhat more." -- John McCain in 2000, on his vote against lowering the top tax rate from 39% to Bush's proposed 35%.
-
I used to watch Bond films specifically for the Gadgets... As did many people I know!
cyber-drugs wrote:
I used to watch Bond films specifically for the Gadgets... As did many people I know!
:wtf: I watch Bond films for Bond girls :-\
Cheers, Vıkram.
"You idiot British surprise me that your generators which grew up after Mid 50s had no brain at all." - Adnan Siddiqi.
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
Too short, only about an hour and forty mins, a good bond film should be 2 and a half hours. No gadgets, no real plot. OK film, just not a Bond Film.
:sigh: I miss Roger Moore.
"When you reach a certain level of comfort, there's nothing wrong with paying somewhat more." -- John McCain in 2000, on his vote against lowering the top tax rate from 39% to Bush's proposed 35%.
Al Beback wrote:
I miss Roger Moore.
Keep reloading.