Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. .NET (Core and Framework)
  4. equivalent

equivalent

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved .NET (Core and Framework)
csharpquestion
11 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Try
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Which technology in .Net is equivalent to EJB?

    J P 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • T Try

      Which technology in .Net is equivalent to EJB?

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jon_Boy
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      What the heck is EJB?

      Any suggestions, ideas, or 'constructive criticism' are always welcome. "There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people." - Mr. Garrison

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jon_Boy

        What the heck is EJB?

        Any suggestions, ideas, or 'constructive criticism' are always welcome. "There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people." - Mr. Garrison

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Paul Conrad
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        kissdznuts wrote:

        What the heck is EJB?

        Enterprise JavaBeans.

        "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Try

          Which technology in .Net is equivalent to EJB?

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Paul Conrad
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          :confused: EJB is Java, .NET is Microsoft. Please elaborate more clearly what you are trying to find out. What exactly do you mean by technology equivalence between the two?

          "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

          W 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Paul Conrad

            :confused: EJB is Java, .NET is Microsoft. Please elaborate more clearly what you are trying to find out. What exactly do you mean by technology equivalence between the two?

            "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

            W Offline
            W Offline
            Wendelius
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I know I'm giving a dumb impression, but I've not used Java seriously. Anyway, have to ask: Isn't EJB more like a pattern than a pure technology. I know that there are API's that help you to encapsulate the business logic but the usage of these services is kind of an architectural question. Am I totaly lost (propably :))?

            The need to optimize rises from a bad design. My articles[^]

            P P 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • W Wendelius

              I know I'm giving a dumb impression, but I've not used Java seriously. Anyway, have to ask: Isn't EJB more like a pattern than a pure technology. I know that there are API's that help you to encapsulate the business logic but the usage of these services is kind of an architectural question. Am I totaly lost (propably :))?

              The need to optimize rises from a bad design. My articles[^]

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Paul Conrad
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Mika Wendelius wrote:

              I've not used Java seriously

              Me neither. At least not since college over three years ago.

              Mika Wendelius wrote:

              Isn't EJB more like a pattern than a pure technology. I know that there are API's that help you to encapsulate the business logic but the usage of these services is kind of an architectural question. Am I totaly lost (propably Smile)?

              I'll admit I am not 100% sure. Looked at it a while back, then discover .NET and stuck with it.

              "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

              W 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Paul Conrad

                Mika Wendelius wrote:

                I've not used Java seriously

                Me neither. At least not since college over three years ago.

                Mika Wendelius wrote:

                Isn't EJB more like a pattern than a pure technology. I know that there are API's that help you to encapsulate the business logic but the usage of these services is kind of an architectural question. Am I totaly lost (propably Smile)?

                I'll admit I am not 100% sure. Looked at it a while back, then discover .NET and stuck with it.

                "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

                W Offline
                W Offline
                Wendelius
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Paul Conrad wrote:

                then discover .NET and stuck with it.

                That makes (at least) two of us :)

                The need to optimize rises from a bad design. My articles[^]

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W Wendelius

                  I know I'm giving a dumb impression, but I've not used Java seriously. Anyway, have to ask: Isn't EJB more like a pattern than a pure technology. I know that there are API's that help you to encapsulate the business logic but the usage of these services is kind of an architectural question. Am I totaly lost (propably :))?

                  The need to optimize rises from a bad design. My articles[^]

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Pete OHanlon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  It's one of those amorphous technology things. Basically, there's a specification that says what EJB must be like and then there's a Container that hosts EJB.

                  Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                  My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

                  W 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Pete OHanlon

                    It's one of those amorphous technology things. Basically, there's a specification that says what EJB must be like and then there's a Container that hosts EJB.

                    Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                    My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

                    W Offline
                    W Offline
                    Wendelius
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Thanks! That explains a few issues I some time ago wondered, but never had the time to really investigate what's it all about. As I agreed with Paul: I found .Net and from there on life has been nothing but sunshine :)

                    The need to optimize rises from a bad design. My articles[^]

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W Wendelius

                      Thanks! That explains a few issues I some time ago wondered, but never had the time to really investigate what's it all about. As I agreed with Paul: I found .Net and from there on life has been nothing but sunshine :)

                      The need to optimize rises from a bad design. My articles[^]

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Pete OHanlon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      I have some ex-Java lads working who couldn't believe who productive you could be in .NET. Now they won't go back.

                      Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                      My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Pete OHanlon

                        I have some ex-Java lads working who couldn't believe who productive you could be in .NET. Now they won't go back.

                        Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                        My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        Kevin McFarlane
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        I've encountered a few people who've done both Java and .NET and all prefer .NET. One said the Java world is more advanced in some ways but the .NET world is more productive with easier-to-use tools.

                        Kevin

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups