Issue/bug tracker recommendations...
-
I would recommend Mantis[^] if you need something simple.
Work @ Network integrated solutions | Flickr | A practical use of the MVC pattern
I'll take a look. Thanks.
-
Free issue/bug tracker recommendations for one-dev projects? What do you guys use?
I'd recommend Trac[^]. Integrates nicely with subversion, if you use it.
cheers, Paul M. Watson.
-
Free issue/bug tracker recommendations for one-dev projects? What do you guys use?
-
Free issue/bug tracker recommendations for one-dev projects? What do you guys use?
Here's a nice big list w/ comments (free and non-free): http://www.pensieve.org/ow.asp?BugTrackingSoftwareDiscussions[^]
----
You're right. These facts that you've laid out totally contradict the wild ramblings that I pulled off the back of cornflakes packets.
-
Free issue/bug tracker recommendations for one-dev projects? What do you guys use?
FogBugz On Demand: free for 1 or 2 users http://www.fogcreek.com/FogBugz/StudentAndStartup.html[^]
Jon Sagara Some see the glass as half-empty, some see the glass as half-full. I see the glass as too big. -- George Carlin .NET Blog | Personal Blog | Articles
-
Free issue/bug tracker recommendations for one-dev projects? What do you guys use?
-
BugTracker.NET is very simple and easy to use. Ignore the source code you get with it though. It's awful. The product itself is great.
cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
-
I have used BugTracker.NET. Although not so pretty, it works well for small teams. There are various other commercial products that offer 'free 5 or less user licenses' that could appeal to you. IIRC, most of those wont allow web facing interfaces for the free versions.
xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now!
((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))I'm the author of BugTracker.NET, but if I were doing a truly one person project I'd use the hosted version of FogBugz, just so as not to have to worry about doing the backups. Free for two users. You wouldn't be able to use it for interacting with your customers though. For that, BugTracker.NET. My own personal next choice would be RedMine. I hate the design philosophy of Mantis, which somebody else recommended.
-
But it misses out the killer app - google spreadsheets. Now it takes about 1/4 of the time to log and access bugs (you need a fairly small project, as of course adding notes etc is a limited process, but it's a very cool tool)
-
Hey, I heard that! The code is getting a little better. More stuff in .cs files, less stuff in includes. If think it's funny, though, with the advent of MVC that <% %> imbedded in HTML is back. I had to wait 6 years but it's back!
LOL. I'm busted! Seriously though: everytime I look at your code I think "one day I'm going to give that guy a present. A present in the form of code with no #includes :D But: I also look at the code and think to myself "it works". And that, my friend, is what's important. :beer:
cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
-
LOL. I'm busted! Seriously though: everytime I look at your code I think "one day I'm going to give that guy a present. A present in the form of code with no #includes :D But: I also look at the code and think to myself "it works". And that, my friend, is what's important. :beer:
cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
What version of BugTracker.NET are you using?
-
Free issue/bug tracker recommendations for one-dev projects? What do you guys use?
Thank you all for the leads.
-
What version of BugTracker.NET are you using?
-
If it's the #includes that you hate the most, here's a line from the release notes for version 2.9.5: * Moved almost all the code out of the old "inc" files. Now, less than 200 lines of trivial code left in the includes. But what you're really missing is the full text search (based on Lucene.NET). Try it at http://ifdefined.com/btnet, the "search text" at the top of the page.
-
If it's the #includes that you hate the most, here's a line from the release notes for version 2.9.5: * Moved almost all the code out of the old "inc" files. Now, less than 200 lines of trivial code left in the includes. But what you're really missing is the full text search (based on Lucene.NET). Try it at http://ifdefined.com/btnet, the "search text" at the top of the page.