New GMail Themese
-
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
You may be able to create a label out of it.
It'll let you, but all that'll do is label every incoming message ;)
----
You're right. These facts that you've laid out totally contradict the wild ramblings that I pulled off the back of cornflakes packets.
Did not think about that:)
Proud to be a CPHog user
-
I thought I was the only one - I love them, currently using Shiny. Best regards, Paul.
Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.
-
Did not think about that:)
Proud to be a CPHog user
-
Christian Graus wrote:
there is still no filter to show only unread mail.
Meh. Search for
is:unread, then bookmark the resulting URL.----
You're right. These facts that you've laid out totally contradict the wild ramblings that I pulled off the back of cornflakes packets.
See, I knew if I complained, someone would help out. Funny thing, the UI said I had one unread, but that link returned about 15.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
-
I thought I was the only one - I love them, currently using Shiny. Best regards, Paul.
Jesus Christ is LOVE! Please tell somebody.
Paul Selormey wrote:
currently using Shiny.
Me too. I love it, so... shiny. Almost as good as an email client written in Silverlight. Now if they could just make it slower...
----
You're right. These facts that you've laid out totally contradict the wild ramblings that I pulled off the back of cornflakes packets.
-
See, I knew if I complained, someone would help out. Funny thing, the UI said I had one unread, but that link returned about 15.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
-
The "terminal" theme is kind'a cool; except the label bitmaps look bad. but I think I'm going with the Candy theme, and loose all my man points.
-
This is the most common theme in modern software development: get the absolute basics working then jump to the user interface and spend inordinate amounts of time endlessly re-polishing it. It's like the hardcore developers and big picture guys are laid off after release 1.0 and the interface guys move in and become fixtures.
"It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don't say it." -Sam Levenson
John C wrote:
spend inordinate amounts of time endlessly re-polishing it
I think you meant spend inordinate amounts of time "adding themes/skinz". If they really did re-polish things and made them better/easier to use then that wouldn't necessarily be so bad (or easy to poke fun at).
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog
-
It'll search all your archived mail as well, unless you tell it not to.
----
You're right. These facts that you've laid out totally contradict the wild ramblings that I pulled off the back of cornflakes packets.
*grin* I didn't even know I *had* archived mail.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
-
*grin* I didn't even know I *had* archived mail.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
-
They keep adding this crap, but there is still no filter to show only unread mail. Why is that ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Not to mention sorting, filtering and/or grouping. That would be nice.
- S 50 cups of coffee and you know it's on! A post a day, keeps the white coats away!
-
They keep adding this crap, but there is still no filter to show only unread mail. Why is that ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
yes, I am thinking of a future like "There should be a option to assign mailids to folders, Incoming emails should be moved to appropriate folders automtically, It must also have the facility to intimate new emails by folder wise."
-
I am thinking of a future like "There should be a option to assign mailids to folders, Incoming emails should be moved to appropriate folders automtically, It must also have the facility to intimate new emails by folder wise."
