Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. Using Regex in C# for ip:port format

Using Regex in C# for ip:port format

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
csharpregexquestion
26 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Navneet Hegde

    Hmmmm not working for 2221.1.1:3000 Sorry!

    Develop2Program & Program2Develop

    L Offline
    L Offline
    leppie
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Navneet Hegde wrote:

    Hmmmm not working for 2221.1.1:3000

    Well, that is not suppose to work...

    xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
    IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now!
    ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L leppie

      You need to escape the '.' else it will match anything.

      xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
      IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now!
      ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mirko1980
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      That is true, too. You must also replace all the . with \. So, the regex is "^\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}:\d{1,5}$" Take in mind that also the above regex is not absolutely correct. For example, it matches also 999.999.999.999:3000.

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L leppie

        Sorry make that 123a123a123a123:1

        xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
        IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now!
        ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Navneet Hegde
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        This should work @"^[0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[:][0-9]{1,5}$" Thanks!

        Develop2Program & Program2Develop

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Navneet Hegde

          This should work @"^[0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[:][0-9]{1,5}$" Thanks!

          Develop2Program & Program2Develop

          L Offline
          L Offline
          leppie
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          Navneet Hegde wrote:

          This should work

          Rather use \. than [.] . Some regex implementations might see [.] as .

          xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
          IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now!
          ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L leppie

            Navneet Hegde wrote:

            This should work

            Rather use \. than [.] . Some regex implementations might see [.] as .

            xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
            IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now!
            ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Navneet Hegde
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Sure thx!

            Develop2Program & Program2Develop

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Andy Rama

              Hi all, I am using C#.Net 2008. I am using following code to varify proper format (udp ip:port i.e "225.1.1.1:3000") of input string. But it is not working properly. System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex regStr = new System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex(@"\d{1,3}.\d{1,3}.\d{1,3}.\d{1,3}:\d{1,5}"); bool b; b = regStr.IsMatch("225.1.1.1:3000"); //return true b = regStr.IsMatch("2225.1.1.1:3000"); //return true. should return false Anybody knows proper regular expression for ip:port format? Can anyone give me good links for using Regex , regular expression in C#. Thanks in advance. Regards, Aniket A. Salunkhe

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              I'd just try to open the port and let the framework figure it out.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P PIEBALDconsult

                I'd just try to open the port and let the framework figure it out.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Luc Pattyn
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                let the framework figure it out.

                and miss all the fun regexing IPv6?

                Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


                Fixturized forever. :confused:


                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Andy Rama

                  Hi all, I am using C#.Net 2008. I am using following code to varify proper format (udp ip:port i.e "225.1.1.1:3000") of input string. But it is not working properly. System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex regStr = new System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex(@"\d{1,3}.\d{1,3}.\d{1,3}.\d{1,3}:\d{1,5}"); bool b; b = regStr.IsMatch("225.1.1.1:3000"); //return true b = regStr.IsMatch("2225.1.1.1:3000"); //return true. should return false Anybody knows proper regular expression for ip:port format? Can anyone give me good links for using Regex , regular expression in C#. Thanks in advance. Regards, Aniket A. Salunkhe

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Roink
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  Another thread came up with: @"^[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}[:][0-9]{1,5}$" But what if you want to constrain the octets to ONLY values from 0 to 255? And what if you really wanna go whole hog and constrain the port to 0 to 65535? I don't know regular expressions that well, so I am curious. Roink

                  Roink

                  J A 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • L Luc Pattyn

                    PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                    let the framework figure it out.

                    and miss all the fun regexing IPv6?

                    Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


                    Fixturized forever. :confused:


                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    PIEBALDconsult
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    I'm more concerned about, "that which will come after IPv6". Let Microsoft do all the work, that's why I pay them. :-D

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Roink

                      Another thread came up with: @"^[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}[:][0-9]{1,5}$" But what if you want to constrain the octets to ONLY values from 0 to 255? And what if you really wanna go whole hog and constrain the port to 0 to 65535? I don't know regular expressions that well, so I am curious. Roink

                      Roink

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      J4amieC
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      Roink wrote:

                      But what if you want to constrain the octets to ONLY values from 0 to 255? And what if you really wanna go whole hog and constrain the port to 0 to 65535?

                      Then you head over to www.regexplib.com and you do a search[^]

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J J4amieC

                        Roink wrote:

                        But what if you want to constrain the octets to ONLY values from 0 to 255? And what if you really wanna go whole hog and constrain the port to 0 to 65535?

                        Then you head over to www.regexplib.com and you do a search[^]

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Roink
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        As they say in Britain, Brilliant! Everything a growing RegEx coder needs! Thank you! Muchas gracias! Merci beaucoup!

                        Roink

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Roink

                          As they say in Britain, Brilliant! Everything a growing RegEx coder needs! Thank you! Muchas gracias! Merci beaucoup!

                          Roink

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          J4amieC
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          Roink wrote:

                          As they say in Britain, Brilliant

                          I think they say that in other countries too, not just here in GB!

                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J J4amieC

                            Roink wrote:

                            As they say in Britain, Brilliant

                            I think they say that in other countries too, not just here in GB!

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            PIEBALDconsult
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            No, it's only there. :-D

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Mirko1980

                              That is true, too. You must also replace all the . with \. So, the regex is "^\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}:\d{1,5}$" Take in mind that also the above regex is not absolutely correct. For example, it matches also 999.999.999.999:3000.

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Andy Rama
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              Mirko1980 wrote:

                              "^\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}:\d{1,5}$"

                              Thanks. It's working to check proper format of string. Still I am working to check proper formt of string with correct ip address & port. Thanks & Regards, Aniket A. Salunkhe

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R Roink

                                Another thread came up with: @"^[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}[:][0-9]{1,5}$" But what if you want to constrain the octets to ONLY values from 0 to 255? And what if you really wanna go whole hog and constrain the port to 0 to 65535? I don't know regular expressions that well, so I am curious. Roink

                                Roink

                                A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Andy Rama
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                Roink, Thanks for the solution. Following is working to check proper ip & port. I found this from regexlib.com. But still need to do varification for port as 0,00,000, etc or 0*. @"^(\d{1,2}|1\d\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])\.(\d{1,2}|1\d\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])\.(\d{1,2}|1\d\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])\.(\d{1,2}|1\d\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5]):(\d{1,4}|[0-5]\d\d\d\d|[0-5]\d\d\d\d|6[0-4]\d\d\d|65[0-4]\d\d|655[0-2]\d|6553[0-5])$" Thanks & Regards, Aniket A. Salunkhe

                                modified on Wednesday, December 3, 2008 4:47 AM

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups