Been said before...
-
Synaptrik wrote:
IGNORE HIM....
So you write a post to: A) Remind me that X exists B) I should ignore X Do you know the meaning of "contradiction"? BTW, don't need to tell me to ignore the particular instance of X you referred to. I already block all his posts; can't read them. AFAIK he only appears in SB indirectly, in posts like yours. ;P
Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.
Diego, have you thought about turning your script into an article? Currently it's a bit buried in the archives...
-
Diego, have you thought about turning your script into an article? Currently it's a bit buried in the archives...
-
Steve_Harris wrote:
Currently it's a bit buried in the archives...
How can I get it? I am not sure where to search.. :(
Apurva Kaushal
-
Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:
I'll buy you something
Hmmm, ... samosas! :) Any suggestion of a good Indian beer to go with it?
Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.
Sure! :-D As for the beer, you'll have to ask someone else; I'm a teetotaller. :)
Cheers, Vıkram.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every moment of it.
-
I was just ranting out loud. I wasn't talking to you personally. My apologies if people thought I was talking to them like children. My mistake, I thought the soapbox was all about the rants. And likewise, I don't wish to fight, just don't see the value in trying to insult me. The way I saw it I could only have insulted those with whom the shoe fits. If I'm wrong and I insulted the entire list membership, then I do sincerely apologize.
This statement is false
Synaptrik wrote:
My apologies if people thought I was talking to them like children.
You mean when you posted, "Go ahead now children and rip on me some more. Lets see what you got. Maybe, just maybe, you'll engage in true wit instead of the schoolyard insults. So grade school" - That was when we misconstrued your remarks?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Looking for sympathy, eh? Although it's completely pathetic, I'll admit it IS pretty funny as well! :-D
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Looking for sympathy, eh?
What a fool you are. Even had I a weak personality like yours, I know better that to look for sympathy from Mr Kaiser. But, if he's not totally immune to the calls of truth or justice, that's excellent.
Ooh, snarky. I wonder if it's because "the community" has started gang-raping you...
-
I was just ranting out loud. I wasn't talking to you personally. My apologies if people thought I was talking to them like children. My mistake, I thought the soapbox was all about the rants. And likewise, I don't wish to fight, just don't see the value in trying to insult me. The way I saw it I could only have insulted those with whom the shoe fits. If I'm wrong and I insulted the entire list membership, then I do sincerely apologize.
This statement is false
Synaptrik wrote:
My mistake, I thought the soapbox was all about the rants.
Happens to the best of us. You have to make that mistake to learn that the SoapBox is really for ambushing people who post a rant. You generally catch 70% of a threads ire just by being the original poster.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
Synaptrik wrote:
My mistake, I thought the soapbox was all about the rants.
Happens to the best of us. You have to make that mistake to learn that the SoapBox is really for ambushing people who post a rant. You generally catch 70% of a threads ire just by being the original poster.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
Diego, have you thought about turning your script into an article? Currently it's a bit buried in the archives...
I promised to do it and still want to. I'll do it on February, after Brazilian Carnaval.
Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.
-
Synaptrik wrote:
Are you still trying to find ways to cut up on me?
I gave you what seemed like a useful hint. Why so paranoid?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Synaptrik wrote:
My apologies if people thought I was talking to them like children.
You mean when you posted, "Go ahead now children and rip on me some more. Lets see what you got. Maybe, just maybe, you'll engage in true wit instead of the schoolyard insults. So grade school" - That was when we misconstrued your remarks?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Looks like you are confusing my original post (which is what I was replying to) with a reply later (which you are quoting). I only meant my original post with regards to my apology. Not my replies. If you start with the abuse, I'll more than happily join in and attempt to make a comedy out of it. If it still insists on being tragic then I'll move on. But, if you're really that bored, scour the net for some political piece to talk about. Why attempt to pick apart my words and hold me to task? Do you love me that much that you insist on making me a better person?
This statement is false
-
BoneSoft wrote:
You generally catch 70% of a threads ire just by being the original poster.
I seldom am the OP. . . :confused:
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Synaptrik wrote:
So, you're not insulting a newbie.
That begs the question, then: why are you acting like one?
-
Every village needs an idiot and he's the SBs village idiot. Depriving the village of their idiot will not be appreciated.
Synaptrik wrote:
some people here appear to need someone to hammer on
Yep the village idiot, if you take away the village idiot you must epect to replace him as a target for a while at least. Besides there are too many here who like playing with the village idiot and they will continue to do so. This is born out by the number of rants that have been started and the years he has been inhabiting the SB.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
and who the hell are you anyways?
"Well, we're getting "F"'d at work. WPF, WCF, and WWF... WTF?" --John Simmons
-
useful at getting my article account uni-voted. Other than that it sounded more like a barb disguised as a helpful hint.
This statement is false
-
Looks like you are confusing my original post (which is what I was replying to) with a reply later (which you are quoting). I only meant my original post with regards to my apology. Not my replies. If you start with the abuse, I'll more than happily join in and attempt to make a comedy out of it. If it still insists on being tragic then I'll move on. But, if you're really that bored, scour the net for some political piece to talk about. Why attempt to pick apart my words and hold me to task? Do you love me that much that you insist on making me a better person?
This statement is false
-
You might want to qualify that some more and actually point out what qualifies my actions as a newbie. I'm listening.... ...lessee... posted a rant.... got slammed with insults... parried a bit.... hmmm... I must be new.
This statement is false