Goddamn I am pissed off... [modified]

Mike Gaskey · modified on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:24 PM

Stan Shannon wrote:

is the most dispicable act in all of American history and the very earliest element of Obama's true legacy.

without a doubt.

Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

Christian Graus · modified on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:24 PM

I disagree with the people booing, but you're saying that these people can have free speech, so long as they don't use it ? Obama's true legacy in your mind, given that he's been respectful of Bush, and said he is a 'good man', is what ?

Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

Mike Gaskey

Christian Graus wrote:

but you're saying that these people can have free speech, so long as they don't use it ?

no, he'sn saying that Obama and his cult are uncouth scum.

Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

Stan Shannon

Christian Graus wrote:

but you're saying that these people can have free speech, so long as they don't use it ?

They have what they have thanks largely to men just like George W. Bush, but that does not mean they deserve it.

Christian Graus wrote:

Obama's true legacy in your mind, given that he's been respectful of Bush, and said he is a 'good man', is what ?

It is far, far, far too late for any of that to have any meaning at all. The only man with any class there today is now back in Texas.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

Christian Graus

Mike Gaskey wrote:

no, he'sn saying that Obama and his cult are uncouth scum.

ROTFL. Well, again, Obama has only been respectful in anything I've seen. But, if 53% of your country are uncouth scum, that would kind of suck. I'm not seeing it, and I've been all over the country this last month.

Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

Christian Graus

Stan Shannon wrote:

They have what they have thanks largely to men just like George W. Bus

Free speech came from men who can hardly form a sentence ? :P Sorry, it was too easy.

Stan Shannon wrote:

It is far, far, far too late for any of that to have any meaning at all.

So, his example is irrelevant ? He's still to blame for the worst of his supporters behaviour ? Is Bush subject to the same level of blame ?

Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

DRHuff · modified on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:24 PM

Showing off the true class and maturity of the Democrats.

I'm pretty sure I would not like to live in a world in which I would never be offended. I am absolutely certain I don't want to live in a world in which you would never be offended. Dave

Oakman · modified on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:24 PM

Stan Shannon wrote:

This is the most dispicable act in all of American history

"In all of American history?" All? You don't have a clue, do you? I mean if you fell into a swimming pool full of horney clues, and you'd sprayed your body with clue pheromes and you offered a thousand a night for one to spend it with you, you wouldn't end up with a single clue to show for your trouble, would you?

Stan Shannon wrote:

Say what you like about Bush he was a good man who tried to do the right thing, and the people booing him are the very definition of vile and evil hate.

Oh goodie! Whine with my dinner.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

Oakman

DRHuff wrote:

Showing off the true class and maturity of the Democrats.

The way Stan is doing for the Republicans?

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

DRHuff

Oakman wrote:

The way Stan is doing for the Republicans?

Yep. It made Dems look like whiners for 8 years and now it will make Reps do the same for 4 or more. But I will give the Republicans credit for way more grace and class on their exit compared to Clinton and his staff. From all reports the Bush White house has done as much as possible to create a smooth turnover for Obama. Compare that to the minimal amount done by the Clinton staff and the state of the offices after they left. I bet the 'O's are still on the keyboards.

I'm pretty sure I would not like to live in a world in which I would never be offended. I am absolutely certain I don't want to live in a world in which you would never be offended. Dave

Stan Shannon

Oakman wrote:

"In all of American history?" All?

Yes, Jon, all. Treating an American who has faithfully and honorably fulfilled the obligations of his office in that fashion is, in fact, absolutely beyond any possibility of a doubt the vilest act that has occured in our history.

Oakman wrote:

Whine with my dinner.

Drink up, asshole.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

Oakman

Stan Shannon wrote:

Treating an American who has faithfully and honorably fulfilled the obligations of his office in that fashion is, in fact, absolutely beyond any possibility of a doubt the vilest act that has occured in our history.

Funny, I would have thought that assassinating "an American who has faithfully and honorably fulfilled the obligations of his office" might be a tad worse. I bet Mr. Lincoln would agree with me.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

leckey 0 · modified on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:24 PM

You can't have free speech and not to disagree with a President, or anyone else for that matter. Rude? Yes. Uncouth? Yes. But to condemn them? That's ANTI-American. As long as a person does not condone violence on another, they have the right to say what they feel. Just because it doesn't mesh with your thoughts does not give you the right to determine their future outcome. BTW, I am still a registered Republican, voted for Bush both times. You make me ashamed of being Republican if your thoughts are the majority of the party.

Back in the blog beatch! http://CraptasticNation.blogspot.com/[^]

Stan Shannon

Oakman wrote:

Funny, I would have thought that assassinating "an American who has faithfully and honorably fulfilled the obligations of his office" might be a tad worse. I bet Mr. Lincoln would agree with me.

Lincoln was murdered by a madman who believed himself to be acting on behalf of a foreign government. But, hey, if you want to present that for comparison, thats fine with me.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

Stan Shannon

leckey wrote:

they have the right to say what they feel.

I didn't say they didn't have the right, I said they didn't deserve it. Using their free speech rights in that way was hypocritical, despicable and as anti-American as any thing any American has ever done.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

leckey 0

So how do you determine who DESERVES more free speech than another in the US?

Back in the blog beatch! http://CraptasticNation.blogspot.com/[^]

Stan Shannon

leckey wrote:

So how do you determine who DESERVES more free speech than another in the US?

Based upon my own, individual, moral evaluations.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

leckey 0

So based on YOUR moral evaluations a person has more free speech? Wow, how anti-1st Amendment of you.

Back in the blog beatch! http://CraptasticNation.blogspot.com/[^]

Stan Shannon

leckey wrote:

So based on YOUR moral evaluations a person has more free speech? Wow, how anti-1st Amendment of you.

I never said any such thing. Booing and ridiculing a man who worked for 8 years to preserve their right to free speech is reprehensible in every damn sense of the word. With freedom comes responsibility. You cannot have one without the other and what those people did was grossly irresponsible, encouraged by the behavior of the democrat party and the American left for the last 8 years.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

BoneSoft

Christian Graus wrote:

Is Bush subject to the same level of blame ?

Near as I can tell, he's to blame for anything that goes wrong anywhere any time. I fully expect to soon hear that Murphy's Law has been renamed Bush's Law. But it's not just Bush, remember one old lady saying Obama was a terrorist? Then suddenly McCain and his entire voting base believed that (if you believe the media anyway)? Stan may be wrong in doing so, but is he more damaging that virtually the entire national media doing it for the other team before the election? I'm not saying it's right, but the media does it for months, no doubt swaying votes, and nobody raises an eyebrow. But Stan does it on CP, and suddenly it deserves rebuke?

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.