Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Personal Ideologies

Personal Ideologies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
csharpcssasp-netcomsysadmin
40 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B BoneSoft

    First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


    Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

    M Offline
    M Offline
    MidwestLimey
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    BoneSoft wrote:

    So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.

    Hi Scott, there is help. New studies suggest a combination of Obamox and Libertrin can have amazing effects ...

    Bar fomos edo pariyart gedeem, agreo eo dranem abal edyero eyrem kalm kareore

    R B 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • M MidwestLimey

      BoneSoft wrote:

      So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.

      Hi Scott, there is help. New studies suggest a combination of Obamox and Libertrin can have amazing effects ...

      Bar fomos edo pariyart gedeem, agreo eo dranem abal edyero eyrem kalm kareore

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rob Graham
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      MidwestLimey wrote:

      combination of Obamox and Libertrin

      Unfortunately they are both addictive and expensive...The initial dose costs between $700B and $1T. And you have to watch out for Pelosidosis and Reidoids as side effects.

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rob Graham

        MidwestLimey wrote:

        combination of Obamox and Libertrin

        Unfortunately they are both addictive and expensive...The initial dose costs between $700B and $1T. And you have to watch out for Pelosidosis and Reidoids as side effects.

        B Offline
        B Offline
        BoneSoft
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        :laugh: Yep, you'll crap blood for a month and have a size 7 poop-chute, but it's all cotton candy and unicorns from then on out.


        Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B BoneSoft

          :laugh: Yep, you'll crap blood for a month and have a size 7 poop-chute, but it's all cotton candy and unicorns from then on out.


          Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dan Neely
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          I thought it was butterflies and unicorns....

          Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M MidwestLimey

            BoneSoft wrote:

            So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.

            Hi Scott, there is help. New studies suggest a combination of Obamox and Libertrin can have amazing effects ...

            Bar fomos edo pariyart gedeem, agreo eo dranem abal edyero eyrem kalm kareore

            B Offline
            B Offline
            BoneSoft
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Yeah, but weren't those studies done by the IPCC with computer models based on amoeba?


            Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dan Neely

              I thought it was butterflies and unicorns....

              Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

              B Offline
              B Offline
              BoneSoft
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              For some yes, but not all patients experienced a thrill up their leg.


              Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B BoneSoft

                First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


                Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                BoneSoft wrote:

                Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.

                You never mentioned what I think is one of your finer traits - you listen to what the other guy is saying, even if you disagree. Likewise, even if someone self-identifies as a conservative, you don't automatically assume that everything they do or say represents truth and beauty.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B BoneSoft

                  First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


                  Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  peterchen
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  That's why you were so... irritated :)

                  BoneSoft wrote:

                  I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies

                  I've grown up in east germany, saw the fall of the wall at age 16, seen "the system" crumble, embraced - not without hesitation - what I believed was the new on - experiencing a few years of a freedom that is probably impossible in any stable society - and finally figured out the new system is as fake and pretentious as the old one. I've had the money in my pockets change twice - from Mark to DM to Euro. Still, I consider my life rather uneventful, safe and protected. I've learnt a few things, however. One is that for the majority*) of people it doesn't really matter if they can't go on vacations because of a rent increase without pay rise, or because of some communist buerocrat thinking you are not parteitreu enough. Personally, I have a strong distrust for people in power - be they "government" or "company owner". Your freedom of commerce can work only because a a selective set of strong unfreedoms. Money can be as much a religion as Jesus Christ. People don't need government, but they need society - and this can come from government, religion, and I hope one day we will find something better for that. So, in conclusion: Hi, I'm Peter. And I'm conservative, and libertarian, and liberal and none of it.


                  *) The difference - IMO is how society deals with the minority. So far, I've gone from the "eradicate them" (in various ways, not all destructive) to "ignore them". A general improvement, but far from deserving that "oh we are so good and they are so bad" praise.

                  Burning Chrome ^ | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • O Oakman

                    BoneSoft wrote:

                    Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.

                    You never mentioned what I think is one of your finer traits - you listen to what the other guy is saying, even if you disagree. Likewise, even if someone self-identifies as a conservative, you don't automatically assume that everything they do or say represents truth and beauty.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    BoneSoft
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    I wasn't looking to toot my own horn. Just dangling my philisophical root in the breeze for all to see. And was hoping for some reciprocation. Just playing I'll show you mine if you'll show me yours. :-D


                    Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B BoneSoft

                      First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


                      Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Synaptrik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      I'll bite. My core philosophy is mixed. Maybe I'll come across as a baffoon, but I'll attempt to explain my view anyway. I'm not an anarchist. I believe we need a government. I don't like large government. But I don't think that small government is the answer. That produces a vacuum that gets filled by corporate interests. Corporations don't die. What they get a hold of they can hold indefinitely. So at some time we need to evaluate what belongs to us as a people. The land's resources should belong to the people in my opinion. Public property. Oil rights is a good example. Mining rights. Etc. If a corporation buys up all of the reserved land being auctioned off they can hold it indefinitely since they don't die. So, over time we can lose our collective property to corporate interests whose primary responsibility is profit. I believe that Wages drive an economy. I believe in the Free Market as an economic model, but I also believe it needs to be corralled. Not interfered with, but not let loose into the wild either. I believe that for the Free Market to have true success there needs to be a livable minimum wage. That a person's time is a commodity. That where profits are made are from consumer spending and the majority don't make enough to spend. I don't believe in Welfare. With a livable minimum wage most social programs can be axed in total. With a livable wage we could all afford health care. Don't need socialized medicine. I don't believe in privatised infrastructure. I don't have any competition for Power, Gas, Water, Or Phone. Its the locally available private company or I can move. That's not a free market. I believe in a Commons belonging to the people. That part of our society that we all depend upon. Our infrastructure is part of that in my view. Only special cases would require assistance with a livable minimum wage. No need for Welfare. And you can't depend on Churches for charity as they argue for the right to discriminate. And in my opinion should be entitled to it. I do believe Churches should be taxed. They make money. Pat Robertson is rich without having to pay tax. I don't believe Abortion and other laws should be federal. I do support the basic Jefforson model of more power to the states. States should have the right to pass laws concerning abortion and drugs for that matter in my view. I believe we should only defend our nation. I believe in Iraq we attacked a nation and didn't defend ours. I believe in Afghanistan we were defending our nation. I believe t

                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Synaptrik

                        I'll bite. My core philosophy is mixed. Maybe I'll come across as a baffoon, but I'll attempt to explain my view anyway. I'm not an anarchist. I believe we need a government. I don't like large government. But I don't think that small government is the answer. That produces a vacuum that gets filled by corporate interests. Corporations don't die. What they get a hold of they can hold indefinitely. So at some time we need to evaluate what belongs to us as a people. The land's resources should belong to the people in my opinion. Public property. Oil rights is a good example. Mining rights. Etc. If a corporation buys up all of the reserved land being auctioned off they can hold it indefinitely since they don't die. So, over time we can lose our collective property to corporate interests whose primary responsibility is profit. I believe that Wages drive an economy. I believe in the Free Market as an economic model, but I also believe it needs to be corralled. Not interfered with, but not let loose into the wild either. I believe that for the Free Market to have true success there needs to be a livable minimum wage. That a person's time is a commodity. That where profits are made are from consumer spending and the majority don't make enough to spend. I don't believe in Welfare. With a livable minimum wage most social programs can be axed in total. With a livable wage we could all afford health care. Don't need socialized medicine. I don't believe in privatised infrastructure. I don't have any competition for Power, Gas, Water, Or Phone. Its the locally available private company or I can move. That's not a free market. I believe in a Commons belonging to the people. That part of our society that we all depend upon. Our infrastructure is part of that in my view. Only special cases would require assistance with a livable minimum wage. No need for Welfare. And you can't depend on Churches for charity as they argue for the right to discriminate. And in my opinion should be entitled to it. I do believe Churches should be taxed. They make money. Pat Robertson is rich without having to pay tax. I don't believe Abortion and other laws should be federal. I do support the basic Jefforson model of more power to the states. States should have the right to pass laws concerning abortion and drugs for that matter in my view. I believe we should only defend our nation. I believe in Iraq we attacked a nation and didn't defend ours. I believe in Afghanistan we were defending our nation. I believe t

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        BoneSoft
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        I agree with a vast majority of what you said. Which leaves me wondering why we've disagreed on so many issues... :confused: Though I believe that's actually been a limited number to date. But most notably, I agree with this:

                        Synaptrik wrote:

                        I believe that we can have passioned debate without resorting to petty insults and abuse. I believe that I have also been guilty of that and will try to abstain.

                        Both sentences.


                        Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B BoneSoft

                          For some yes, but not all patients experienced a thrill up their leg.


                          Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Dan Neely
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          I was referring to this.[^] Butterflies and unicorns is the cannonical synopsis. :cool:

                          Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B BoneSoft

                            I wasn't looking to toot my own horn. Just dangling my philisophical root in the breeze for all to see. And was hoping for some reciprocation. Just playing I'll show you mine if you'll show me yours. :-D


                            Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Stan Shannon
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            Of course, Jon assumes he has something to say thats worth listening to rather than a narrow set of trite libertarians rationalizations.

                            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dan Neely

                              I was referring to this.[^] Butterflies and unicorns is the cannonical synopsis. :cool:

                              Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              BoneSoft
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Yep, I've had to go back and watch that several times. Cracks me up when he's on the unicorn flying over the raibow singing about the hope for change.


                              Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B BoneSoft

                                First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


                                Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stan Shannon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                My core belief is that it is important to keep things that can be seperate from government, separate from government, regardless of how democratic that government might be. That is essentially the importance of free market capitalism and christianity to our particular form of civilization. Both provide a largely self regulating mechanism for human interaction which do not need to be controlled by the state. They provide a means of providing moral parameters and a means of economic independence which the state should never be allowed to directly control. As you suggested, the state's primary role is enforcing a set of common laws, with those deemed essential to human liberty clearly stated in a constitution and strictly enforced by a central political authority, with all others deliberated upon and enforced directly by the people themselves at the local level of government. I might add also that I feel that civilization is inherently tyrannical. The important thing is to counter balance one form of tyranny with another. The tyranny of the state is balanced by the tyranny of the people, the economic tyranny of capitalism is balanced by the moral tryanny of the church both of which combine to oppose the political tyranny from both the state and the people. If one social institution is allowed to exlusively possess all possible forms of tyranny - poliltical, economic and moral, than all hope is lost for any notion of freedom and liberty. And no amount of democracy will be enough to deal with the state when it controls all those forms of tyranny.

                                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                modified on Friday, January 23, 2009 7:01 PM

                                S S 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • B BoneSoft

                                  I agree with a vast majority of what you said. Which leaves me wondering why we've disagreed on so many issues... :confused: Though I believe that's actually been a limited number to date. But most notably, I agree with this:

                                  Synaptrik wrote:

                                  I believe that we can have passioned debate without resorting to petty insults and abuse. I believe that I have also been guilty of that and will try to abstain.

                                  Both sentences.


                                  Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Synaptrik
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Well, to be honest, I think that I was clouded by Parken's anger. He gets a bit black when he doesn't like something and I mistook your post for his. But mostly I haven't really disagreed too much with you.

                                  This statement is false

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B BoneSoft

                                    First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


                                    Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    MrPlankton
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    Personal Ideologies as it relates to government. Leave me alone. Personal Ideologies as it relates to religion. Ecclesiastes 12:12-14

                                    MrPlankton

                                    Mexican boy: Viene la tormenta! Sarah Connor: What did he just say? Gas Station Attendant: He said there's a storm coming Sarah Connor: [sighs] I know.

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B BoneSoft

                                      First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


                                      Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      Diego Moita
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      A few of my personal beliefs: 1) Personal beliefs are dangerous. They can fossilize into dogmatism, ideologies and prejudice. 2) A society where everyone just takes care of himself is, quite often, a society where the strong prey on the weak. 3) Government and politicians are a necessary evil. Used with care they might not be so evil. Most people don't use them with care. 4) In the long run, politicians don't matter; institutions do matter. 5) I'm not afraid of contradictions. Reality is chaotic, therefore realist people are chaotic. Only dogmatic lunatics are coherent. 6) The pocket is the most sensitive part of the human body. Everybody has good intentions and a noble spirit until it hurts their pockets.


                                      Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B BoneSoft

                                        First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


                                        Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                                        O Offline
                                        O Offline
                                        Oakman
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        I'll let someone else say it for me: "I believe in my neighbors. I know their faults, and I know that their virtues far outweigh their faults. "I believe in my fellow citizens. Our headlines are splashed with crime yet for every criminal there are 10,000 honest, decent, kindly men. If it were not so, no child would live to grow up. Business could not go on from day to day. Decency is not news. It is buried in the obituaries, but is a force stronger than crime. I believe in the patient gallentry of nurses and the tedious sacrifices of teachers. I believe in the unseen and unending fight against desperate odds that goes on quietly in almost every home in the land. "I believe in Rodger Young. (Americans) are free today because of endless unnamed heroes from Valley Forge to the Yalu River. I believe in -- I am proud to belong to -- the United States. Despite shortcomings from lynchings to bad faith in high places, our nation has had the most decent and kindly internal practices and foreign policies to be found anywhere in history "And finally, I believe in my whole race. Yellow, white, black, red, brown. In the honesty, courage, intelligence, durability, and goodness of the overwhelming majority of my brothers and sisters everywhere on this planet. I am proud to be a human being. I believe that we have come this far by the skin of our teeth. That we always make it just by the skin of our teeth, but that we will always make it. Survive. Endure. I believe that this hairless embryo with the aching, oversize brain case and the opposable thumb, this animal barely up from the apes will endure. Will endure longer than his home planet -- will spread out to the stars and beyond, carrying with him his honesty and his insatiable curiosity, his unlimited courage and his noble essential decency. "This I believe with all my heart." -Robert A. Heinlein.

                                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                        S R 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Stan Shannon

                                          Of course, Jon assumes he has something to say thats worth listening to rather than a narrow set of trite libertarians rationalizations.

                                          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Shepman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Were you under the impression that we missed Ilion? Or does his absence just give you more room to display childishness? The Oak may be over the top sometimes, but at his worst, he is more interesting, informative and intelligent than you can ever hope to be.

                                          S S 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups