Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Personal Ideologies

Personal Ideologies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
csharpcssasp-netcomsysadmin
40 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B BoneSoft

    I agree with a vast majority of what you said. Which leaves me wondering why we've disagreed on so many issues... :confused: Though I believe that's actually been a limited number to date. But most notably, I agree with this:

    Synaptrik wrote:

    I believe that we can have passioned debate without resorting to petty insults and abuse. I believe that I have also been guilty of that and will try to abstain.

    Both sentences.


    Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Synaptrik
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Well, to be honest, I think that I was clouded by Parken's anger. He gets a bit black when he doesn't like something and I mistook your post for his. But mostly I haven't really disagreed too much with you.

    This statement is false

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B BoneSoft

      First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


      Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      MrPlankton
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      Personal Ideologies as it relates to government. Leave me alone. Personal Ideologies as it relates to religion. Ecclesiastes 12:12-14

      MrPlankton

      Mexican boy: Viene la tormenta! Sarah Connor: What did he just say? Gas Station Attendant: He said there's a storm coming Sarah Connor: [sighs] I know.

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B BoneSoft

        First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


        Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Diego Moita
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        A few of my personal beliefs: 1) Personal beliefs are dangerous. They can fossilize into dogmatism, ideologies and prejudice. 2) A society where everyone just takes care of himself is, quite often, a society where the strong prey on the weak. 3) Government and politicians are a necessary evil. Used with care they might not be so evil. Most people don't use them with care. 4) In the long run, politicians don't matter; institutions do matter. 5) I'm not afraid of contradictions. Reality is chaotic, therefore realist people are chaotic. Only dogmatic lunatics are coherent. 6) The pocket is the most sensitive part of the human body. Everybody has good intentions and a noble spirit until it hurts their pockets.


        Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B BoneSoft

          First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


          Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          I'll let someone else say it for me: "I believe in my neighbors. I know their faults, and I know that their virtues far outweigh their faults. "I believe in my fellow citizens. Our headlines are splashed with crime yet for every criminal there are 10,000 honest, decent, kindly men. If it were not so, no child would live to grow up. Business could not go on from day to day. Decency is not news. It is buried in the obituaries, but is a force stronger than crime. I believe in the patient gallentry of nurses and the tedious sacrifices of teachers. I believe in the unseen and unending fight against desperate odds that goes on quietly in almost every home in the land. "I believe in Rodger Young. (Americans) are free today because of endless unnamed heroes from Valley Forge to the Yalu River. I believe in -- I am proud to belong to -- the United States. Despite shortcomings from lynchings to bad faith in high places, our nation has had the most decent and kindly internal practices and foreign policies to be found anywhere in history "And finally, I believe in my whole race. Yellow, white, black, red, brown. In the honesty, courage, intelligence, durability, and goodness of the overwhelming majority of my brothers and sisters everywhere on this planet. I am proud to be a human being. I believe that we have come this far by the skin of our teeth. That we always make it just by the skin of our teeth, but that we will always make it. Survive. Endure. I believe that this hairless embryo with the aching, oversize brain case and the opposable thumb, this animal barely up from the apes will endure. Will endure longer than his home planet -- will spread out to the stars and beyond, carrying with him his honesty and his insatiable curiosity, his unlimited courage and his noble essential decency. "This I believe with all my heart." -Robert A. Heinlein.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          S R 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            Of course, Jon assumes he has something to say thats worth listening to rather than a narrow set of trite libertarians rationalizations.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Shepman
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            Were you under the impression that we missed Ilion? Or does his absence just give you more room to display childishness? The Oak may be over the top sometimes, but at his worst, he is more interesting, informative and intelligent than you can ever hope to be.

            S S 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • S Shepman

              Were you under the impression that we missed Ilion? Or does his absence just give you more room to display childishness? The Oak may be over the top sometimes, but at his worst, he is more interesting, informative and intelligent than you can ever hope to be.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              Shepman wrote:

              he is more interesting, informative and intelligent than you can ever hope to be.

              No, actually, I'm pretty sure I am at least as informed, well read, well reasoned and intelligent as he is. I simply get in trouble for challanging the social parameters that we are all supposed to acknowledge to be considered morally upright new-agers. As to being interesting, I am the most interesting person I have ever met.

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                I'll let someone else say it for me: "I believe in my neighbors. I know their faults, and I know that their virtues far outweigh their faults. "I believe in my fellow citizens. Our headlines are splashed with crime yet for every criminal there are 10,000 honest, decent, kindly men. If it were not so, no child would live to grow up. Business could not go on from day to day. Decency is not news. It is buried in the obituaries, but is a force stronger than crime. I believe in the patient gallentry of nurses and the tedious sacrifices of teachers. I believe in the unseen and unending fight against desperate odds that goes on quietly in almost every home in the land. "I believe in Rodger Young. (Americans) are free today because of endless unnamed heroes from Valley Forge to the Yalu River. I believe in -- I am proud to belong to -- the United States. Despite shortcomings from lynchings to bad faith in high places, our nation has had the most decent and kindly internal practices and foreign policies to be found anywhere in history "And finally, I believe in my whole race. Yellow, white, black, red, brown. In the honesty, courage, intelligence, durability, and goodness of the overwhelming majority of my brothers and sisters everywhere on this planet. I am proud to be a human being. I believe that we have come this far by the skin of our teeth. That we always make it just by the skin of our teeth, but that we will always make it. Survive. Endure. I believe that this hairless embryo with the aching, oversize brain case and the opposable thumb, this animal barely up from the apes will endure. Will endure longer than his home planet -- will spread out to the stars and beyond, carrying with him his honesty and his insatiable curiosity, his unlimited courage and his noble essential decency. "This I believe with all my heart." -Robert A. Heinlein.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Stan Shannon
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                Oakman wrote:

                I'll let someone else say it for me:

                There's a surprise... :rolleyes:

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B BoneSoft

                  First off, let me say that I have absolutely no intention of this thread turning into another of our many many "you disagree with me so you're obviously an idiot" fiascos... Partly because some of you, I cannot fathom what leads you to the views you have. And partly just because I think it would be interesting to know, and help put some things in perspective... I'm interested in knowing what core things shape your political philosophies. Personally, I have a healthy distrust for all things government. So to me the only good government is a small government. People, for the most part, can take care of themselves. And the more that government has a hand in "helping" people, the less freedoms they have, and the less opportunity they have to learn to take care of themselves. That's the core belief. That the more power government has, the more they (and individuals in it) use that power how they see fit. Because of that core belief, communism is my antithesis. Capitalism wins out by default as a system of commerce and fits that philosophy rather well. Also because of that core belief, the nuclear family is essential for taking care of some of those who truely can't take care of themselves and as a support system to individuals in the family that doesn't require government. To which, religion is well suited to further support. To me, the government should provide laws to enforce at least a minimal moral code to keep communities civil and just. And it should provide infrastructure as needed to support the facilities we need and use. And there are some people who truely need help who don't have family or other support, to which it's easy to argue that the federal government needs to provide assistance to. And it needs to maintain and support a military that's strong enough to keep the external wolves at bay. That's me in a nutshell. I'm not looking for criticism on my views, but of course I can't stop you. And constructive criticism is hardly ever a bad thing. I'm just interested in hearing others core philosophies, especially those I don't understand. I'm hoping that having a better understanding of what makes us all tick, will give us a better chance of understanding each others arguments and where they come from. So in conclusion: Hi I'm Scott, and I'm a Conservativaholic.


                  Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Chris Austin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  I really only want a basic federal government and really agree with a federalist system. I think the government should be there to protect us from violence as well as anything or anyone that would try to curtail our freedoms as well as violate our social customs. As far a social safety-net and social services goes I am not inherently against it as long as it is controlled and decided on locally rather than at the federal level. I just think the federal government should strive to stay out of our daily lives except of course in special situations. I agree that trade free of many restrictions is inherently better than a heavy regulated system. But, where I think we have failed is that the people running the companies and those putting them in power lack any respect for our cultural customs. Instead they have opted for a marginal profit growth at all cost approach that is bad for business in the long term. I have no idea how to regulate morality or a respect for customs rather than to let these bad apples fail and be mindful not to support them. Some other things I've grown to believe are: Democracy seems inherently disadvantaged by people whom would blindly consume anything put in front of them rather than think about what they really want and hold dear. No one should ever have to sacrifice [^] but rather give when they feel it is the right thing to do. Mindless Consumerism (keeping up with the Joneses) is not a good goal in life yet it seems the default. There is no such thing as a "social contract". At least I've never signed one.

                  Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long

                  modified on Friday, January 23, 2009 7:56 PM

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Shannon

                    Shepman wrote:

                    he is more interesting, informative and intelligent than you can ever hope to be.

                    No, actually, I'm pretty sure I am at least as informed, well read, well reasoned and intelligent as he is. I simply get in trouble for challanging the social parameters that we are all supposed to acknowledge to be considered morally upright new-agers. As to being interesting, I am the most interesting person I have ever met.

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Shepman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    As to being interesting, I am the most least interesting person I have ever met.

                    Arrogance can be simply an appreciation for one's own skill and talents. In your case, however, it appears to be a old man's fantasy. Anything you have said that might possibly be considered interesting you have said so many times that one has to assume that you are simply cutting and pasting. Like Ilion before you, you have given up attempting to communicate - and simply wish to post insults and inanities.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Shepman

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      As to being interesting, I am the most least interesting person I have ever met.

                      Arrogance can be simply an appreciation for one's own skill and talents. In your case, however, it appears to be a old man's fantasy. Anything you have said that might possibly be considered interesting you have said so many times that one has to assume that you are simply cutting and pasting. Like Ilion before you, you have given up attempting to communicate - and simply wish to post insults and inanities.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stan Shannon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      Shepman wrote:

                      Anything you have said that might possibly be considered interesting you have said so many times that one has to assume that you are simply cutting and pasting

                      I just use this as a froum for refuting commonly held misperceptions about culture, history, politics etc because those misperciptions deserve to be refuted. But, I don't repeat myself any more than does anyone else around here. There is only one known political formula for both optimal economic and social stability which also provides for optimal human liberty and freedom. That formula is the one articulated and formalized by our founding generation. The further we move away from that formula the more we sacrifice either economic stability, social stability or liberty, or (most likely) all of the above. It doesn't matter what anyone wishes things to be like, that is simply a fact.

                      Shepman wrote:

                      Like Ilion before you, you have given up attempting to communicate - and simply wish to post insults and inanities.

                      Except that I don't do that. You just don't like what I communicate. It is your own little way of trying to limit free expression - find a way to demonize what you don't want to hear, an altogether too common tactic in our modern political world.

                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        My core belief is that it is important to keep things that can be seperate from government, separate from government, regardless of how democratic that government might be. That is essentially the importance of free market capitalism and christianity to our particular form of civilization. Both provide a largely self regulating mechanism for human interaction which do not need to be controlled by the state. They provide a means of providing moral parameters and a means of economic independence which the state should never be allowed to directly control. As you suggested, the state's primary role is enforcing a set of common laws, with those deemed essential to human liberty clearly stated in a constitution and strictly enforced by a central political authority, with all others deliberated upon and enforced directly by the people themselves at the local level of government. I might add also that I feel that civilization is inherently tyrannical. The important thing is to counter balance one form of tyranny with another. The tyranny of the state is balanced by the tyranny of the people, the economic tyranny of capitalism is balanced by the moral tryanny of the church both of which combine to oppose the political tyranny from both the state and the people. If one social institution is allowed to exlusively possess all possible forms of tyranny - poliltical, economic and moral, than all hope is lost for any notion of freedom and liberty. And no amount of democracy will be enough to deal with the state when it controls all those forms of tyranny.

                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                        modified on Friday, January 23, 2009 7:01 PM

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Sahir Shah
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        ...tyranny... freedom ...liberty.

                        You support legislation such as the Patriot Act and yet you scream tyranny if the federal government does anything beyond printing currency and securing the national borders. Make up your mind; are you for or against tyranny?

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O Oakman

                          I'll let someone else say it for me: "I believe in my neighbors. I know their faults, and I know that their virtues far outweigh their faults. "I believe in my fellow citizens. Our headlines are splashed with crime yet for every criminal there are 10,000 honest, decent, kindly men. If it were not so, no child would live to grow up. Business could not go on from day to day. Decency is not news. It is buried in the obituaries, but is a force stronger than crime. I believe in the patient gallentry of nurses and the tedious sacrifices of teachers. I believe in the unseen and unending fight against desperate odds that goes on quietly in almost every home in the land. "I believe in Rodger Young. (Americans) are free today because of endless unnamed heroes from Valley Forge to the Yalu River. I believe in -- I am proud to belong to -- the United States. Despite shortcomings from lynchings to bad faith in high places, our nation has had the most decent and kindly internal practices and foreign policies to be found anywhere in history "And finally, I believe in my whole race. Yellow, white, black, red, brown. In the honesty, courage, intelligence, durability, and goodness of the overwhelming majority of my brothers and sisters everywhere on this planet. I am proud to be a human being. I believe that we have come this far by the skin of our teeth. That we always make it just by the skin of our teeth, but that we will always make it. Survive. Endure. I believe that this hairless embryo with the aching, oversize brain case and the opposable thumb, this animal barely up from the apes will endure. Will endure longer than his home planet -- will spread out to the stars and beyond, carrying with him his honesty and his insatiable curiosity, his unlimited courage and his noble essential decency. "This I believe with all my heart." -Robert A. Heinlein.

                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rob Graham
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          Ditto (my turn)

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Shepman

                            Were you under the impression that we missed Ilion? Or does his absence just give you more room to display childishness? The Oak may be over the top sometimes, but at his worst, he is more interesting, informative and intelligent than you can ever hope to be.

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Sahir Shah
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            yeah and he's punny too.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Stan Shannon

                              My core belief is that it is important to keep things that can be seperate from government, separate from government, regardless of how democratic that government might be. That is essentially the importance of free market capitalism and christianity to our particular form of civilization. Both provide a largely self regulating mechanism for human interaction which do not need to be controlled by the state. They provide a means of providing moral parameters and a means of economic independence which the state should never be allowed to directly control. As you suggested, the state's primary role is enforcing a set of common laws, with those deemed essential to human liberty clearly stated in a constitution and strictly enforced by a central political authority, with all others deliberated upon and enforced directly by the people themselves at the local level of government. I might add also that I feel that civilization is inherently tyrannical. The important thing is to counter balance one form of tyranny with another. The tyranny of the state is balanced by the tyranny of the people, the economic tyranny of capitalism is balanced by the moral tryanny of the church both of which combine to oppose the political tyranny from both the state and the people. If one social institution is allowed to exlusively possess all possible forms of tyranny - poliltical, economic and moral, than all hope is lost for any notion of freedom and liberty. And no amount of democracy will be enough to deal with the state when it controls all those forms of tyranny.

                              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                              modified on Friday, January 23, 2009 7:01 PM

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Shepman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #30

                              Stan Shannon wrote:

                              My core belief is

                              "f*** this goddamned collectivist piece of sh*t country."[^]

                              S O 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • S Shepman

                                Stan Shannon wrote:

                                My core belief is

                                "f*** this goddamned collectivist piece of sh*t country."[^]

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stan Shannon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #31

                                Shepman wrote:

                                "f*** this goddamned collectivist piece of sh*t country."[^]

                                Indeed...

                                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Rob Graham

                                  Ditto (my turn)

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Stan Shannon
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #32

                                  So, precisely how does... "I believe in my neighbors. I know their faults, and I know that their virtues far outweigh their faults. "I believe in my fellow citizens." ... square with libertarian principles? Clearly, you can't 'believe in your fellow citizens' and still fear to give them the freedom and power to participate in defining the rules and standards that define their civilization.

                                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Sahir Shah

                                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                                    ...tyranny... freedom ...liberty.

                                    You support legislation such as the Patriot Act and yet you scream tyranny if the federal government does anything beyond printing currency and securing the national borders. Make up your mind; are you for or against tyranny?

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Stan Shannon
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #33

                                    Sahir Shah wrote:

                                    Make up your mind; are you for or against tyranny?

                                    I am both for it and against it.

                                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Shepman

                                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                                      My core belief is

                                      "f*** this goddamned collectivist piece of sh*t country."[^]

                                      O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      Oakman
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #34

                                      Shepman wrote:

                                      Stan Shannon wrote: My core belief is "f*** this goddamned collectivist piece of sh*t country."[^]

                                      People used to say that Ilion and Adnan were opposite sides of the same coin. It turns out that Stan and Adnan are the same side of the same coin.

                                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M MrPlankton

                                        Personal Ideologies as it relates to government. Leave me alone. Personal Ideologies as it relates to religion. Ecclesiastes 12:12-14

                                        MrPlankton

                                        Mexican boy: Viene la tormenta! Sarah Connor: What did he just say? Gas Station Attendant: He said there's a storm coming Sarah Connor: [sighs] I know.

                                        B Offline
                                        B Offline
                                        BoneSoft
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #35

                                        That pretty much covers it.


                                        Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Stan Shannon

                                          Shepman wrote:

                                          Anything you have said that might possibly be considered interesting you have said so many times that one has to assume that you are simply cutting and pasting

                                          I just use this as a froum for refuting commonly held misperceptions about culture, history, politics etc because those misperciptions deserve to be refuted. But, I don't repeat myself any more than does anyone else around here. There is only one known political formula for both optimal economic and social stability which also provides for optimal human liberty and freedom. That formula is the one articulated and formalized by our founding generation. The further we move away from that formula the more we sacrifice either economic stability, social stability or liberty, or (most likely) all of the above. It doesn't matter what anyone wishes things to be like, that is simply a fact.

                                          Shepman wrote:

                                          Like Ilion before you, you have given up attempting to communicate - and simply wish to post insults and inanities.

                                          Except that I don't do that. You just don't like what I communicate. It is your own little way of trying to limit free expression - find a way to demonize what you don't want to hear, an altogether too common tactic in our modern political world.

                                          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Shepman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #36

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          Except that I don't do that.

                                          No, of course not. When you wrote, "f*** Lowery, f*** Obama, f*** the democrat party, f*** the liberals, and f*** this goddamned collectivist piece of sh*t country." you weren't trolling, it just seemed that way.

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups