Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor
  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. One for the stupid people

One for the stupid people

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
csharpannouncement
19 Posts 4 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    John Carson wrote:

    And where in that post did I claim that it proves global warming?

    So your post was pointless?

    Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

    J Offline
    J Offline
    John Carson
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    fat_boy wrote:

    So your post was pointless?

    No, the idea of answering a fool according to his folly is to highlight the folly.

    John Carson

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J John Carson

      fat_boy wrote:

      So your post was pointless?

      No, the idea of answering a fool according to his folly is to highlight the folly.

      John Carson

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      And an answer without a question is, pointless.

      Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J John Carson

        I have reached another member of my target audience. I could point out that the article also says:

        The record of six days of 40 degree heat or more was set in January 1908. On Tuesday Adelaide had a top temperature of 43.2 degrees. The Weather Bureau is forecasting a further five days of 40 degrees or more for the city. The State's longest heatwave happened last March, with 15 days above 35 degrees.

        Thus, by one measure (temperature above 35), the longest heatwave on record was last March and the longest heatwave by another measure (temperature above 40) is predicted to occur over the next few days. Of course, that in itself doesn't mean much. I was merely indulging in the Biblical practice of answering a fool according to his folly. Naturally the fools learned nothing and only added to their foolishness.

        John Carson

        B Offline
        B Offline
        bryce
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        *sigh* all of that are whats happening "on record" any idea what it was like 500 years ago/1000 years? you're a bit sad man Bryce

        MCP --- To paraphrase Fred Dagg - the views expressed in this post are bloody good ones. --
        Publitor, making Pubmed easy. http://www.sohocode.com/publitor

        Our kids books :The Snot Goblin, and Book 2 - the Snotgoblin and Fluff

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J John Carson

          I have reached another member of my target audience. I could point out that the article also says:

          The record of six days of 40 degree heat or more was set in January 1908. On Tuesday Adelaide had a top temperature of 43.2 degrees. The Weather Bureau is forecasting a further five days of 40 degrees or more for the city. The State's longest heatwave happened last March, with 15 days above 35 degrees.

          Thus, by one measure (temperature above 35), the longest heatwave on record was last March and the longest heatwave by another measure (temperature above 40) is predicted to occur over the next few days. Of course, that in itself doesn't mean much. I was merely indulging in the Biblical practice of answering a fool according to his folly. Naturally the fools learned nothing and only added to their foolishness.

          John Carson

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stan Shannon
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          I'm sure it comforts you to know, John, that, at least on the Science, I agree with you.

          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            I'm sure it comforts you to know, John, that, at least on the Science, I agree with you.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            John Carson
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            I'm sure it comforts you to know, John, that, at least on the Science, I agree with you.

            It does comfort me somewhat.

            John Carson

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J John Carson

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              I'm sure it comforts you to know, John, that, at least on the Science, I agree with you.

              It does comfort me somewhat.

              John Carson

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              You're still totally fucked up on everything else, though...

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                You're still totally fucked up on everything else, though...

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                John Carson
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                You're still totally f***ed up on everything else, though...

                Of course.

                John Carson

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  And an answer without a question is, pointless.

                  Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  John Carson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  fat_boy wrote:

                  And an answer without a question is, pointless.

                  You continue to demonstrate new inadequacies. An answer does not need to be in reply to a question. It can equally be a reply to a statement. Try adding a dictionary to your reading material. From the Concise Oxford Dictionary: answer n. 1. something said or done to deal with or in reaction to a question, statement, or circumstance.

                  John Carson

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J John Carson

                    fat_boy wrote:

                    And an answer without a question is, pointless.

                    You continue to demonstrate new inadequacies. An answer does not need to be in reply to a question. It can equally be a reply to a statement. Try adding a dictionary to your reading material. From the Concise Oxford Dictionary: answer n. 1. something said or done to deal with or in reaction to a question, statement, or circumstance.

                    John Carson

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    :zzz:

                    Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J John Carson

                      For the benefit of those stupid people who insist on judging climate change on the basis of short term weather in single locations. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/28/2476403.htm[^]

                      John Carson

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      Proof![^]

                      ___________________________________________ .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes

                      • Login
                      • Don't have an account? Register
                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups