I see he attempting to do it again

[Lost User]

Richard A. Abbott wrote:

I'm no fan of he whose name should not be mentioned.

...Voldemort?

[Ilion]

Rob Graham wrote:

A long trail of successive "You're a *liar*" alternating with "No I'm not" really isn't very interesting "traffic" or discussion.

And you *are* such a liar ... for, as we *all* know, My "abusive" language is *always* in response to that of "the community." You children dish it out, falsely. You can't abide getting it back, honestly earned.

[Ilion]

Richard A. Abbott wrote:

Yes he does annoy (an sometimes offend) with his antics however, to his benefit, his posts do tend to generate substantial traffic and discussion.

Other than the fact that "antics" more accurately describes the behaviors of "the community," I too long ago noticed that you kiddies *need* me.

[Rob Graham]

Illion wrote: And you *are* such a liar ... for, as we *all* know, My "abusive" language is *always* in response to that of "the community." You children dish it out, falsely. You can't abide getting it back, honestly earned.

(See below)[edit]oops, gone already...[/edit] Any more questions, Richard?

[Rob Graham]

He is not rehabilitatable, as he has just demonstrated.

[Oakman]

EliottA wrote:

...Voldemort?

Helen's adopted city.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

[Lost User]

From *his* response, his rehabilitation looks like it could be a protracted affair. So, no more questions from me on this very subject.

[Ilion]

Richard A. Abbott wrote:

Yes he does annoy (an sometimes offend) with his antics however, to his benefit, his posts do tend to generate substantial traffic and discussion.

Well, you know, you *could* give a couple of these fellows a taste of their own medicine.

[Lost User]

As much as you annoy the CP members with your unnecessary antics, I am of the opinion that your views and observations should be heard. So if you remove permanently those unnecessary antics from your postings the CP members may indeed welcome you back. Apparently, the ball is in your court.

[Ilion]

Richard A. Abbott wrote:

As much as you annoy the CP members with your unnecessary antics, I am of the opinion that your views and observations should be heard. So if you remove permanently those unnecessary antics from your postings the CP members may indeed welcome you back. Apparently, the ball is in your court.

Self-contradict much?

[Lost User]

A view and/or observation on a story and/or related posting from a CP member is not the same as an unproductive and unnecessary antic such as name calling.