Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Open osurce is booming, or wait it's broken and not holding up to it's promises...

Open osurce is booming, or wait it's broken and not holding up to it's promises...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
com
3 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    alex barylski
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I just finished reading these two articles: http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2008/tc20081130_319283.htm[^] http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2008/tc20081130_276152.htm[^] I realize they are probably focusing on slightly different OSS projects but still... Is it just me or do they seem contradictorary to each other, like no wonder I'm confused about I have a future in software. :P Cheers, Alex

    J M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • A alex barylski

      I just finished reading these two articles: http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2008/tc20081130_319283.htm[^] http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2008/tc20081130_276152.htm[^] I realize they are probably focusing on slightly different OSS projects but still... Is it just me or do they seem contradictorary to each other, like no wonder I'm confused about I have a future in software. :P Cheers, Alex

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jim Crafton
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Not exactly. It seems to me that both are true. Under the whole GPL system, which is what you have most of the time for these kinds of companies, these companies are not "software" companies, they're consulting firms. So selling the consulting is going great, so long as they can under cut their competition. However from a standpoint of actually trying to sell software they suck, because they don't/won't/can't make money at that. Pure OSS as your only business model is stupid and bound to fail in the long run.

      ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A alex barylski

        I just finished reading these two articles: http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2008/tc20081130_319283.htm[^] http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2008/tc20081130_276152.htm[^] I realize they are probably focusing on slightly different OSS projects but still... Is it just me or do they seem contradictorary to each other, like no wonder I'm confused about I have a future in software. :P Cheers, Alex

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Marc Clifton
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I guess they were practicing for Obama's Fairness Act. Marc

        Available for consulting and full time employment. Contact me. Interacx

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups