HD Partitions
-
You'll only benefit if the swap is on a separate physical drive. If you're concurrently loading data and writing to the swap on the same HD you're still going to thrash.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall
I used to believe the same thing, and then I read otherwise. While theoretically true, it seems that modern OS's do benefit from a swap on a different drive rather it be physical or illogical.
Need software developed? Offering C# development all over the United States, ERL GLOBAL, Inc is the only call you will have to make.
If you don't ask questions the answers won't stand in your way.
Most of this sig is for Google, not ego. -
When you format your HD, what the size that you let for Windows and for data? I was letting 40Gb for Windows/Program Files and the remainder (120Gb) for data files (my documents/etc). I will purchase a 500Gb HD, then I was thinking about 100Gb for Windows and 400Gb for data. What's your settings?
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:
For my most of my departments development machines at work I have 50GB for windows XP / applications and the rest for data.
John
-
You'll only benefit if the swap is on a separate physical drive. If you're concurrently loading data and writing to the swap on the same HD you're still going to thrash.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall
-
On my home machine with 250GB I set Windows XP to 10GB and the rest of the hdd for program files and data. I used nLite to change the default drive of program files to the d: I don't have many apps installed as the pc is mostly for videos and music.
Do you know some nLite-like program where I can change Program Files folder location after installation?
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:
-
I used to believe the same thing, and then I read otherwise. While theoretically true, it seems that modern OS's do benefit from a swap on a different drive rather it be physical or illogical.
Need software developed? Offering C# development all over the United States, ERL GLOBAL, Inc is the only call you will have to make.
If you don't ask questions the answers won't stand in your way.
Most of this sig is for Google, not ego.Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
on a different drive rather it be physical or illogical.
Now you should clarify something to me: illogical drives are from apple or are the ones that allow to install vista on them? (sorry) ;P
-
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
on a different drive rather it be physical or illogical.
Now you should clarify something to me: illogical drives are from apple or are the ones that allow to install vista on them? (sorry) ;P
Joan Murt wrote:
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: on a different drive rather it be physical or illogical. Now you should clarify something to me: illogical drives are from apple or are the ones that allow to install vista on them?
No! illogical drives are Logical drives from Apple!
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:
-
When you format your HD, what the size that you let for Windows and for data? I was letting 40Gb for Windows/Program Files and the remainder (120Gb) for data files (my documents/etc). I will purchase a 500Gb HD, then I was thinking about 100Gb for Windows and 400Gb for data. What's your settings?
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:
I usually have different drives: * At home: - 1xHDD 40Gb for Windows 7. - 2xHDD 80Gb for documents & programs. * At work: - 1xHDD 250Gb for windows vista and programs. - n network drives placed inside our servers in order to store any document. My 2 cents.
-
When you format your HD, what the size that you let for Windows and for data? I was letting 40Gb for Windows/Program Files and the remainder (120Gb) for data files (my documents/etc). I will purchase a 500Gb HD, then I was thinking about 100Gb for Windows and 400Gb for data. What's your settings?
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:
I always use separate disks. For the "basic office machines" we configure with one HDD only, the split is 50:50.
-
When you format your HD, what the size that you let for Windows and for data? I was letting 40Gb for Windows/Program Files and the remainder (120Gb) for data files (my documents/etc). I will purchase a 500Gb HD, then I was thinking about 100Gb for Windows and 400Gb for data. What's your settings?
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:
Clickok wrote:
What's your settings?
I stopped partitioning drives when I discovered that I could never accurately estimate the size I would need for the partition. 40G for Windows/Program Files? That sounds woefully small. I just checked--the 64bit Program Files is under 1GB, the x86 Program Files is 14GB. Swap file is another 8GB or so. Hmmm. I suppose 40GB is ok. One thing I think is a good idea is to put the swap file on a separate physical drive. I've noticed performance improvement when doing that. Marc
Available for consulting and full time employment. Contact me. Interacx
-
You'll only benefit if the swap is on a separate physical drive. If you're concurrently loading data and writing to the swap on the same HD you're still going to thrash.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall
dan neely wrote:
You'll only benefit if the swap is on a separate physical drive.
Regardless of same/different drive, the fragmentation will be reduced.
Best wishes, Hans
[CodeProject Forum Guidelines] [How To Ask A Question] [My Articles]
-
Clickok wrote:
What's your settings?
I stopped partitioning drives when I discovered that I could never accurately estimate the size I would need for the partition. 40G for Windows/Program Files? That sounds woefully small. I just checked--the 64bit Program Files is under 1GB, the x86 Program Files is 14GB. Swap file is another 8GB or so. Hmmm. I suppose 40GB is ok. One thing I think is a good idea is to put the swap file on a separate physical drive. I've noticed performance improvement when doing that. Marc
Available for consulting and full time employment. Contact me. Interacx
Marc Clifton wrote:
I stopped partitioning drives when I discovered that I could never accurately estimate the size I would need for the partition. 40G for Windows/Program Files? That sounds woefully small.
Agreed. I went hogwild my last system and did a 4way partition. IIRC OS 20GB, Apps 100GB, Documents 20GB, media 460GB. I forgot that temps and the desktop (aka the midden) were in documents and settings, and spent lots of time shuffling stuff out. :doh: Never again. It was an interesting exercise to see which companies determined paths properly and which were hard coded for C:\Program Files\
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall
-
Clickok wrote:
What's your settings?
I stopped partitioning drives when I discovered that I could never accurately estimate the size I would need for the partition. 40G for Windows/Program Files? That sounds woefully small. I just checked--the 64bit Program Files is under 1GB, the x86 Program Files is 14GB. Swap file is another 8GB or so. Hmmm. I suppose 40GB is ok. One thing I think is a good idea is to put the swap file on a separate physical drive. I've noticed performance improvement when doing that. Marc
Available for consulting and full time employment. Contact me. Interacx
Marc Clifton wrote:
I stopped partitioning drives when I discovered that I could never accurately estimate the size I would need for the partition.
I agree, but my reason is that I need reinstall Windows frequently, and I don't have a second physical drive, then for simplicity I prefer separate windows/programs from data.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:
-
dan neely wrote:
You'll only benefit if the swap is on a separate physical drive.
Regardless of same/different drive, the fragmentation will be reduced.
Best wishes, Hans
[CodeProject Forum Guidelines] [How To Ask A Question] [My Articles]
Only if you set a page file small enough that it fragments in the 1st place. HDs are cheap enough there's no reason not to specify 3-4x the size of your ram in which case the system becomes unusable first. NTM the fact that there's almost no return from defragmenting segments larger than about 64mb because the transfer time dominates over the seek time.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall
-
When you format your HD, what the size that you let for Windows and for data? I was letting 40Gb for Windows/Program Files and the remainder (120Gb) for data files (my documents/etc). I will purchase a 500Gb HD, then I was thinking about 100Gb for Windows and 400Gb for data. What's your settings?
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:
i never partition. just buy a 2nd HD - it's safer and cleaner.
-
You'll only benefit if the swap is on a separate physical drive. If you're concurrently loading data and writing to the swap on the same HD you're still going to thrash.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall
-
When you format your HD, what the size that you let for Windows and for data? I was letting 40Gb for Windows/Program Files and the remainder (120Gb) for data files (my documents/etc). I will purchase a 500Gb HD, then I was thinking about 100Gb for Windows and 400Gb for data. What's your settings?
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:
On my primary machine, I have a 160gb SATA drive that has nothing but the boot partition on it. My development drive is a separate 500gb SATA drive, and I have a 1tb SATA drive with two equal-sized partitions (the E: drive contains nothing but the program files folders, and the F drive contains data. On my web server, it's a 80gb IDE drive for the boot drive, and a 320gb drive for the actual web sites. On my wife's machine, it's a 160gb SATA for booting, and a 500gb for data and installed applications and data. My laptop has a 200gb drive with just one partition. All of these are backed up on a regular basis onto my homemade NAS that has a 20gb laptop drive to boot from, and a 500gb and 1tb SATA drives for storing the backups. Common theme (in case you didn't notice) - wherever possible, I use a separate drive for booting. The boot drive only contains Windows and drivers. ALL installed programs and data are placed on a secondary drive.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
When you format your HD, what the size that you let for Windows and for data? I was letting 40Gb for Windows/Program Files and the remainder (120Gb) for data files (my documents/etc). I will purchase a 500Gb HD, then I was thinking about 100Gb for Windows and 400Gb for data. What's your settings?
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:
Sigh! This discussion comes up at least once a month here (not sure how you missed them all) and there are two camps, the old school people who can't seem to wrap their heads around modern technology and advocate all manner of partitioning and the modern enlightened people who would advise that it's just not necessary any more and only paints yourself into a corner down the road. If you want to separate your data make a subdirectory called "Data" and keep your data there. There is no useful reason to partition in this day and age. Look more toward your backup strategy than your partitioning strategy, backup is actually still very relevant even today. :)
"It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don't say it." -Sam Levenson
-
I always keep a partition only for windows swap file. I don't know if in this days it still help so much, but in the past was a real system boost. And the two ones you already mentioned.
You avoid fragmentation, but you incur long seeks. Fragmentaiton can be avoided by creating a large-enough swap file once (set to "No swap file", reboot, set desired swap file size, reboot. done.). e.g. when you set apart a small partition at the "end" of the disk for the swap file, there will be frequent seeks from one end of the disk to the other. BAD.
-
I used to believe the same thing, and then I read otherwise. While theoretically true, it seems that modern OS's do benefit from a swap on a different drive rather it be physical or illogical.
Need software developed? Offering C# development all over the United States, ERL GLOBAL, Inc is the only call you will have to make.
If you don't ask questions the answers won't stand in your way.
Most of this sig is for Google, not ego.Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
and then I read otherwise
Well, I read that I can earn up to $20K a month working two hours a day from home! Performance is so subjective I accept only these things: (1) Reproducable measurement (2) A serious technical explanation that does not run contrary to what I belive :rolleyes: (3) It says "Velociraptor" on the box
-
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
and then I read otherwise
Well, I read that I can earn up to $20K a month working two hours a day from home! Performance is so subjective I accept only these things: (1) Reproducable measurement (2) A serious technical explanation that does not run contrary to what I belive :rolleyes: (3) It says "Velociraptor" on the box
I agree, in general. However, when I hear or read something like this I ask myself what is the cost of implementing. If it is trivial and presents a low risk I err on the side of the statement. If it goes against common-sense, requires an effort, and presents a risk then I just stay with the status quo. Of course any person here who has written an operating system and hd driver would know immediately. ( I haven't) I wonder if people like that post on CP?
Need software developed? Offering C# development all over the United States, ERL GLOBAL, Inc is the only call you will have to make.
If you don't ask questions the answers won't stand in your way.
Most of this sig is for Google, not ego.
