Good Answer

[Stan Shannon]

Richard A. Abbott wrote:

McCain chose an unknown as his running-mate. So it is reasonable for "the Press" to ask a myriad of questions about her, including finding out any skeletons there existing. When you go into National Politics, essentially, you lose nearly all rights to a private life. She knew these things and accepted those restrictions, why can't Stan Shannon? Now she has again returned to relative obscurity, a kind-of "normal" lifestyle can now be enjoyed.

And why didn't Obama get the same treatment?

Richard A. Abbott wrote:

Regarding Jeffersonian democracy, so you want to return to an obsolete system.

There is nothing obselete about it. It remains the most advanced political theory in the world, which is precisely why it is so dangerous. In fact, if anything, the amount of effort that it has taken to overthrow it, and return human civilization to a nearly pre-enlightenment condition, demonstrates precisely how effective and workable Jeffersonian principles are.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

[Lost User]

Stan Shannon wrote:

And why didn't Obama get the same treatment?

For a few weeks of Palin's life, the press were extremely interested in her. Obama had been in "the limelight" for considerably longer so the press had ample time and opportunities to investigate him. Investigate him they no doubt did, but over a longer timescale. And some sensational stuff came out, so he did get "the treatment".

[Stan Shannon]

Richard A. Abbott wrote:

For a few weeks of Palin's life, the press were extremely interested in her. Obama had been in "the limelight" for considerably longer so the press had ample time and opportunities to investigate him. Investigate him they no doubt did, but over a longer timescale. And some sensational stuff came out, so he did get "the treatment".

No actual news gathering organization in the world has done any investigative journalism of any kind on Obama. They sent dozens of reporters out to gather all the information they could on Palin, but have never sent anyone out to do anything on Obama. Ever. They did everything they could to obfuscate and coverup for him on the issues that were uncoverred from other media sources. The media never broke any story on his chruch, his minister, his deals with Rezko(sp?), his association with Ayers, his life prior to his taking public office, his associations with ACORN and other groups, his activities in college, his early years. Nothing. We know less about Obama than we have ever known about anyone who has ever set in the oval office. And that is by design. We are not supposed to know. The duplicity on this could not be more obvious or overt, and anyone who defends it is clearly a part of the process. It is vile and it is evil on every possible level, it is anti-democractic, anti-AMerican, anti-Jeffersonian, anti-western, it is, in short, part and parcel of socialist principles and tactics at work in AMerican society. The reason that is no big deal to you is becuase you are part of it.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

[Oakman]

Stan Shannon wrote:

I have spent most of my adult life in uniform defending this country against the USSR

Stan has admitted in this forum that he joined the Naval guard during the Vietnam war in a vain attempt to avoid active duty. Unfortunately for him his outfit was mobilized. Fortunately for him he never came closer to combat than watching helicopters take off. (It was equally fortunate for anyone whose life might have depended on his combat skills.) Later he joined the Army national guard to pick up some extra bucks, but as soon as it looked like we might go to war in the middle east he moved to a spot in Utah that allowed him to claim he was too far away from any unit to travel to the meetings. (Again, Stan has admitted this here in this forum.) So they dumped him as a bad investment. Although the guard was (over)used by Rumsfeld to keep from re-imposing the draft in the 2000's and many of its members served bravely and well in Iraq, one should remember that back in the sixties and seventies, guys in the real armed forces used to call the guard, draft-dodgers - or say that that their serial numbers all began with NG, as proof that they were "No Good." In Stan's defense, he didn't get out of service altogether by claiming to have a pilonidal cyst like his hero Limbaugh did. Given Stan's homophobia, it was probably because he didn't want any doctor messing around with his asshole long enough to be able to give him the excuse. . .

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

[Lost User]

Stan Shannon wrote:

We are not supposed to know

Ever considered that Obama's early life was so boring that it was uneventful and thus uninteresting? If his association with ACORN is contrary to, or incompatible with, the good due to the public office he holds, then you must do that which your Constitution allows in order for that to stop now and for the future.

Stan Shannon wrote:

The reason that is no big deal to you is becuase you are part of it.

I reckon you are over-acting the part. He may be left of centre in terms of his politics, but his policies over the next few years are what you should judge him by. He may turn out to be the saviour of the United States. But then again, he might not be. Time will tell.

[Stan Shannon]

Oakman wrote:

Stan has admitted in this forum that he joined the Naval guard during the Vietnam war in a vain attempt to avoid active duty. Unfortunately for him his outfit was mobilized. Fortunately for him he never came closer to combat than watching helicopters take off. (It was equally fortunate for anyone whose life might have depended on his combat skills.) Later he joined the Army national guard to pick up some extra bucks, but as soon as it looked like we might go to war in the middle east he moved to a spot in Utah that allowed him to claim he was too far away from any unit to travel to the meetings. (Again, Stan has admitted this here in this forum.) So they dumped him as a bad investment.

Jon, please that is just dishonest. I have been entirely honest about my military experiences. I joined the active duty navy in January 1972 for a four year enlistment three months after turning 18 (I had enlisted the summer before, but January was the earliest slot they had following my 18th birthday). I did so largly for two reasons, my father was concerned about my low draft number and didn't want me to be drafted. He had served in the Navy in WWII and saw it as a perfectly honorable alternative to the draft. And, because I wanted to learn electronics and the Navy had the best electronics schools. By Novemeber of 1972 all US ground forces had been pulled out of Vietname but Naval operations continued until 1975 (76?). So regardless of my motives, I saw more of Vietnam by joining the Navy than I would have by being drafted. In fact, my ship was the flag ship of the task force that demined haiphong harbor. I served as part of a rescue team that would have gone after any pilots that went down (never needed). I did my fucking duty. So fuck you. I joined the guard after being in ROTC and served as a field artillary officer in the Oklahoma national guard (171FA, 45th "Thunderbird" ID) for about four years, got out for a while, served in the Army Reserves for a while, than went back into the Guard. MOved to Utah in the early '90s and with the draw down in military at that time had trouble finding a slot close to my home which is a common problem with Guard service for officers. I could have continued my service on an inactive. unassigned, status, but simply did not want to. I probably would not have stayed in even if I had never left Oklahoma.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us

[Stan Shannon]

Richard A. Abbott wrote:

Ever considered that Obama's early life was so boring that it was uneventful and thus uninteresting? .

I'm actually pretty sure that if Obama's grandad had set him up with a neo-Nazi mentor rather than a member of the American communist party (fact) it would not be considered 'boring' by anyone.

Richard A. Abbott wrote:

If his association with ACORN is contrary to, or incompatible with, the good due to the public office he holds, then you must do that which your Constitution allows in order for that to stop now and for the future.

I intend to, but, again, if this had been a christian community organization that Palin had belonged to, it would have been a lead story every single day of the campaign. ACORN is nothing more than a front for various socialist organizations.

Richard A. Abbott wrote:

He may be left of centre in terms of his politics, but his policies over the next few years are what you should judge him by. He may turn out to be the saviour of the United States. But then again, he might not be. Time will tell.

He will implement his policies through the courts not through legislation - fortunantly for him, he has an equally leftist congress to see to that side of things.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

[Stan Shannon]

Oakman wrote:

back in the sixties and seventies, guys in the real armed forces used to call the guard, draft-dodgers

So were the Navy, the Air Force, the Coast Guard, and any number of non-combat arms units in the US Army and US Marine corp. You didn't have to join the Guard to "dodge" the draft. But it was all perfectly honorable military service.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

[Oakman]

Stan Shannon wrote:

Jon, please that is just dishonest.

Nope. But I will admit that I was mistaken about your service in the Navy. It wasn't NG it was active duty. I misread the import of your original claim to have served ten years in the NG. Still and all, you enlisted in an attempt to get out of combat. And you never saw any combat of any kind. Nonetheless, I owe you an apology.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

[Oakman]

Stan Shannon wrote:

So were the Navy, the Air Force, the Coast Guard, and any number of non-combat arms units in the US Army and US Marine corp.

Sorry, but you have no idea what you were talking about. In addition to the B-52 bombing, the Airforce flew many many ground support missions notably using Puff the Magic Dragon to bring peace to the jungle. They also had some of the bravest and craziest pilots in the world as forward observers. The Navy ran hundreds of river boats up and down the Mekong - some of the most dangerous duty in the war. Just because you were a pansy-assed REMF, doesn't mean that there weren't heroes in the Navy, too. Some 8,000 Coast Guardsmen and 56 different combat vessels were assigned to duty in Vietnam. Nope, truth be told, you really had to work at it to hide behind the lines and cheerlead.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

[Oakman]

Stan Shannon wrote:

He will implement his policies through the courts not through legislation

You seem to have gotten that wrong. They're already talking about the mortgage-bailout bill.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

[Stan Shannon]

Oakman wrote:

And you never saw any combat of any kind.

Thats not quite true - my ship shot down a mig one day that was approaching our task force. So, technically speaking, I've been in combat. (Although I've wondered since if it were actually a threat or an excuse to test the new rocket launchers). I bravely manned my general quarters station in repair three throughout the entire ordeal. :rolleyes:

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

[Stan Shannon]

Nope. There were indeed many units that saw combat in all the services. But joining the Air Force or Navy or coast guard was a pretty safe ticket. And even in the Army and Marines, if you joined rather than being drafted there were any number of non-combat arms MOS's you could choose. Getting out of combat duty was not all that difficult. In fact, considering all the available alternatives, letting yourself get drafted was almost a form of volunteering for combat.

Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

[Oakman]

Stan Shannon wrote:

Getting out of combat duty was not all that difficult

But a lot of men still had a pair of balls - in all the services.

Stan Shannon wrote:

In fact, considering all the available alternatives, letting yourself get drafted was almost a form of volunteering for combat.

Twasn't always that easy to tell the difference. When the punk kid on the scooter drove by he was as likely to throw the grenade at a company clerk as at a Green Beanie.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

[Ed Gadziemski]

Oakman wrote:

They're already talking about the mortgage-bailout bill.

And already passed SCHIP and Stimulus and Ledbetter, all without a single court hearing. Rarely has Stan been so wrong so frequently about so many things. He used to be a relatively intelligent bloke before the madness set in. It's a shame to see such mental deterioration in one so young.

[Ed Gadziemski]

Fuck you asshole.

[JimmyRopes]

Got your panties in a bunch Ed? :rolleyes:

Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

[Ed Gadziemski]

Depends on if you were applying "Sedition, betrayal, treason, and disloyalty come to mind" to me or were merely helping Stan learn a few new synonyms.

[JimmyRopes]

Ed Gadziemski wrote:

Depends on if you were applying "Sedition, betrayal, treason, and disloyalty come to mind" to me or were merely helping Stan learn a few new synonyms.

Depends on if what Stan said about you, "So,basically, you're saying that it is entirely appropriate that the freedom loving people of Iraq should be killing the evil American troops, and that you are taking their side against your own country.", is how you feel.

Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

[Ed Gadziemski]

What Stan says is immaterial. Stan is insane. If you have 3rd grade or above reading comprehension and a basic grasp of logic and bothered to read the thread, you know how I feel. If not, then welcome to Stan World.