Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Site has a bug?

Site has a bug?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comhelpquestion
11 Posts 9 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    Paul Brower
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    All my articles show errors on the site when I try to read them. Is anyone aware of this bug? Here's a link to an article ... which should work: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/miscctrl/SimpleLine.aspx[^]

    Y W C 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • P Paul Brower

      All my articles show errors on the site when I try to read them. Is anyone aware of this bug? Here's a link to an article ... which should work: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/miscctrl/SimpleLine.aspx[^]

      Y Offline
      Y Offline
      Yusuf
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      the link works fine for me. [Edit] May be by the I tested it was all fixed. See Chris's post below [/Edit]

      Yusuf

      modified on Sunday, March 1, 2009 9:17 PM

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Paul Brower

        All my articles show errors on the site when I try to read them. Is anyone aware of this bug? Here's a link to an article ... which should work: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/miscctrl/SimpleLine.aspx[^]

        W Offline
        W Offline
        Wes Jones
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        It was getting this bit of drama too... This link : http://www.codeproject.com/KB/WCF/WCFOverview.aspx[^] gives me this error: Error: An item with the same key has already been added.. Ticket: 399800 I'm on IE8. It worked after I switched to compatibility view.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Paul Brower

          All my articles show errors on the site when I try to read them. Is anyone aware of this bug? Here's a link to an article ... which should work: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/miscctrl/SimpleLine.aspx[^]

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chris Maunder
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Sorry about that - I uploaded a new stored procedure that was out of sync with the code and, well, the rest is history.

          cheers, Chris Maunder CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Maunder

            Sorry about that - I uploaded a new stored procedure that was out of sync with the code and, well, the rest is history.

            cheers, Chris Maunder CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Tut tut tut; don't use stored procedures. :-D

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P PIEBALDconsult

              Tut tut tut; don't use stored procedures. :-D

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Maunder
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              You're right. Inline SQL is so much faster, safer and maintainable!

              cheers, Chris Maunder CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

              S H T 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Maunder

                You're right. Inline SQL is so much faster, safer and maintainable!

                cheers, Chris Maunder CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Shog9 0
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Chris Maunder wrote:

                You're right. Inline SQL is so much faster, safer and maintainable!

                Also prettier. You left out prettier.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Chris Maunder

                  You're right. Inline SQL is so much faster, safer and maintainable!

                  cheers, Chris Maunder CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  Hans Dietrich
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  It's all about LOC. :-D

                  Best wishes, Hans


                  [CodeProject Forum Guidelines] [How To Ask A Question] [My Articles]

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Chris Maunder

                    You're right. Inline SQL is so much faster, safer and maintainable!

                    cheers, Chris Maunder CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    ah, now Parameterized Dynamic SQL --- there's a thing of beauty! Speedy, safe, *and* maintainable.

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

                      ah, now Parameterized Dynamic SQL --- there's a thing of beauty! Speedy, safe, *and* maintainable.

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      Brady Kelly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      It's still an order of magnitude harder to update, especially with out client base who very seldom have DBA's. A SQL script to 'alter proc' is still much easier than deploying even a little, well behaved .NET dll.

                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Brady Kelly

                        It's still an order of magnitude harder to update, especially with out client base who very seldom have DBA's. A SQL script to 'alter proc' is still much easier than deploying even a little, well behaved .NET dll.

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        you are correct, there is that.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups